Forums
-
Aerosoft | House Of Simulation
-
- 10.6k
- posts
-
- 1
- post
-
- 626
- posts
-
- 138.7k
- posts
-
- 1.4k
- posts
-
- 285
- posts
-
-
Hardware
-
- 299
- posts
-
- Jdobbin0232
- By SimWare,
-
- 11.4k
- posts
-
-
Aerosoft Flight | Flight Simulation Support
-
- 89.7k
- posts
-
- 34.6k
- posts
-
- 393.9k
- posts
-
- 102k
- posts
-
- 109
- posts
-
- 291
- posts
-
- 867
- posts
-
- 1.5k
- posts
-
- 241
- posts
-
-
Aerosoft Move | Game Support
-
- 6.1k
- posts
-
- 159
- posts
-
- 1.1k
- posts
-
- 1.6k
- posts
-
- 129
- posts
-
- 49
- posts
-
-
Aerosoft Friends
-
- 9.8k
- posts
-
- 3.9k
- posts
-
![Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account]](https://forum.aerosoft.com/uploads/monthly_2023_09/Aerosoft_Social_Media_Profilbild_Neu23.thumb.jpg.03721825e6a434ed4af0c8b2b73a5898.jpg)
-
Who's Online 174 all people including: 4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 169 Guests (See full list)
-
Recent Achievements
-
Announcements
-
Recently Browsing
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Posts
-
Hi, I was able to follow your directions and the problem was not replicated. FSUIPC is off my system however I do use it for other modules. I reinstalled FSUIPC but removed the CRJ profile and it still seems to work. Thankful that this issue is resolved but seems like I will not be able to use FSUIPC? Drew Ritz
-
Hi, How did you assign the speedbrakes in Xplane? (Screenshot of the assignments display is perfect)
-
Thank you for the information, Eric. 🙂 In the meantime I got more details about the Ground Services and how this works in general and my config will most likely do nothing to the Ground Service but only fix the jetway connection issues. If someone is interested in a new configuration for the ground services I need some testers who actually own the affected aircraft as I don't own this one myself. -
I don't think so. After making all Ramps available to TG it seems it prioritizes the gate ramps over the apron ones and I don't know if or how this can be adjusted at all (aside from blocking many of the gate ramps by using improper ramp start types as it was before I fixed this). The situation seems to me that the airport is that large so even on highest traffic density settings, there are too many ramps to populate all of them and TG prioritizes those at the terminals so there are only few aircraft at the non-gate parkings. Before I fixed the gate ramps TG did not use them at all but placed aircraft at the apron ramps instead so those were configured properly and I did not change these configurations - but your observation is right, after fixing the gate ramps TG did no longer populate the aprons as before although those ramps are configured the same way, I think it's about the airport's size in the end requiring more aircraft than TG allows to populate everything. But, to avoid misunderstandings: Using the updated files you should get all terminals surrounded by aircrafts and fewer aircrafts at the non-terminal parkings - if this the case, it is correct from my point of view.
-
By Daniel Trives Villapalos · Posted
Hi, i've recently purchase the honeycomb bravo throttle quadrant for xplane 11 and its all okey except form the speedbrakes. They cant stay in the armed or the flight detent positions. Also i cant change the crs with the honeycomb. I fly the 737 default, no zibo or any mod. Can anyone help me? -
By Eric Bouvier · Posted
Hi Agi, LEMD is great as it stands now. I have only one last issue if this is workable: The aprons look abandoned with almost no A/C at all. Can this be changed with some TWY internal design for TG? Cheers. -
-
By Eric Bouvier · Posted
Hi Agi, It’s been a long time ago but I promised to keep you posted on your SAM implementation for the ToLiss A320. I have in the meantime tested a few flights and airports with this astounding ToLiss A/C and I must say SAM jetways work at all times (I haven’t tested all worldwide airports of course but I consider having around 10 European airports working should make it go). So here are my acknowledgements for the work you have done for this. Eric -
By tiggerchen2001 · Posted
Wäre schön. Aber hege so langsam Zweifel daran. Im Flusi.info Forum schrieb einer der Entwickler, dass das Team sich getrennt habe. Er meinte dazu, jetzt nur einige neue Gebäudetexture erstellen zu müssen. Diese Aussage war aber schon vor Monaten und auf seinen Wunsch wurde auch der Forumsbeitrag gesperrt. Daher kann man es leider nicht gegenlesen. Vielleicht könnte sich Aerosoft als Publisher dazu äußern, ob das Projekt noch angedacht ist. It would be nice. But I'm starting to have doubts about it. In the Flusi.info forum one of the developers wrote that the team had split up. He said that now he just needs to create some new building textures. But this statement was made months ago and at his request the forum post was blocked. Therefore, unfortunately you cannot proofread it. Perhaps Aerosoft, as a publisher, could comment on whether the project is still being considered. -
Hallo Freunde Habe auch diese Ruckler, allerdings ohne Frames Verlust (35 begrenzt), nur am Boden, bei Richtungswechsel. Zink deaktiviert und die Ruckler wurden weicher. In der Luft ist alles in Ordnung, da läuft es gut. Werde dennoch ein wenig warten, bis die Ruckler kein Thema sind. LG Raimund LOWW
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics120k
-
Total Posts838.7k
-
-
Files
-
