Stimmt, eigentlich hätte ich nicht mal die Runway gebraucht, sondern hätte gleich vom Hangar aus starten können. Dann hätte ich mir auch das mühsame Taxeln zur Runwaymitte sparen können. Das war bei dem Wind nämlich fast schwieriger.
And while you are at it, please also fix the following bug: When I open the map in FSX and click on EDDF Airport on the map, only the ILS frequencies for runways 07L, 07C and 07R get displayed. The frequencies for all 25 runways currently can only get displayed when you click directly on the respective ILS path in the FSX map. Thank you!
Yes, with PDMG, UTX, REX and ASN + AI Traffic, this brilliantly designed and FPS friendly airport is unflyable due to VAS limitations. Unfortunately, it's worst VAS-performing airport after UK2000 EGLL that I eventually managed to fly into with Lite texture pack. Perhasp, Aerosoft/GAP should in follow this example.
With all due respect....no simmer flies these days in the DEFAULT environment. Almost all of us uses either ORBX products or UTX, ASN, REX, complex planes...too may to mention. Therefore, proper VAS management should have been done WITH these widely-used add-ones in mind. This is a "new normal" approach in 2016.
Other than VAS usage, the product is just a piece of art. I wish I were able to use it.
I now switched off all other airport add-ons in my FSX scenery library and made a test flight starting at the run-up position to RWY 25C with default weather in the Aerosoft A320. I still am stuck at around 10 FPS (or even lower at most of the times) in all phases: taxiing to the take-off runway, take-off, traffic pattern around the airport, approach, taxiing from the landing runway towards the gate. So it can't be because of a specific object, but the whole airport and its vicinity seem to create all those problems. I also get VAS usage of up to 85 % (or even 87 %, when doing a lot of view tilting) in external view while taxiing past Terminal 1. Please note that I didn't even fly from another airport to EDDF, I just took off EDDF, flew the traffic pattern and then landed again at EDDF.
See for yourself the following screenshot - and please note that my frames sometimes even drop below the 9.2 displayed here while taxiing at EDDF. I must say, that so far, EDDF v2 remains the airport add-on with which I get the worst FPS and VAS results in my FSX so far.
That's a video from over a year ago and they did not deliver on it. Simple fact is that in all our test (yes we would love to have good rain effects) it kills framerates. We have tested all add-ons that have rain effect and even for very small windows and very large drops the effect is severe.