@data63 Hast du das zweite auch gelesen? Das, dass man an einer ähnlichen Version arbeitet (was ja eigentlich die Hauptsache ist, oder)?!
Nun zu deiner Frage: Durchforste mal das Internet, die Steam-Foren und auch hier die Aerosoft-Foren...
Man muss da etwas rumtricksen und es in Fakeordner installieren usw... Auch Veränderungen in der FSX.cfg wurden genannt, aber die SE besitzt diese ja gar nicht! Hat bei mir jedenfalls nie geklappt!
Emanuel, the reason you have great sales and data to prove it, is because you are the leaders in producing affordable products that wow us!! we look forward
to that with every new release!! texturing windows is old school , cartoonish more like AI and default planes!! look at Mcphat studios, they are the masters
in realistic texturing , when they decided to develop the ATR, they didn't choose window texturing!! they modeled it correctly with cabin windows!! if you look at
the most preferred sim planes flown in most of the forums, the ones that are textured are cargo and the rest is not! its because we prefer flying the more realistic looking ones and more!!
The A330 is a beautiful bird and needs to be modeled with the same quality as your 320 series if not more! frame rate friendly and boring will fade really fast!!
I hope you guys would consider that with an update or a feature when released!!
Hehehehe. That's cool. And best wishes for your PhD Dr.
One cannot be blamed for asking modifications and extra stuff. Aerosoft has spoiled us by complying with most requests with the A320 project and offering an amazing aircraft for an amazing price. And the support, I mean, nothing is unanswered or not solved. So I trust they have started this project with sooooo much more knowledge and experience to know almost exactly what we love, again at an amazing price. Thank you Aerosoft dearly.
Has anyone tried turning AI traffic "Off" and seeing if a landing and taxi is possible for FSX? I'm just curious if someone wouldn't mind trying, preferably with the PMDG 777. I can live with landing and no AI, then using AI for departure. Anyways if anyone has the time thanks.
Please find us something better than the Aerosoft A320 series. Aerosoft were crazy enough to deliver 4 aircraft of that quality (much back in the day) in exchange for peanuts, at a time when heavenly PMDG and CaptainSim sold an expensive base first, then a separate price for the variation.
The others are good. And Aerosoft is great, time tested, and they WILL deliver the best A330 till date without breaking the bank (if we don't continuously demotivate the team, and make them second guess their proven methods).
When I was in high school, someone started developing a 747 for a third time, someone who already made a 747-400, promised us a -8 variant, someone promised a super realistic A320, someone promised an A380, and someone had posted amazing shot of a 787 virtual cockpit.
These days, I am busy with my PhD... those planes are still under development.
Talk to them for me, will you?
Da kannst Du nur den Entwickler der Tastatur fragen. Wir helfen dir gerne bei allen Aerosoft Produkten, bei dieser Textur handelt es sich aber nicht um eines unserer Produkte, sondern um die Files eines Users.
I went to open my fuel manager app to generate a load sheet for my flight today and I get this message
Now I have had my airbus for 10 months now and never had a problem with anything till today when I got that. Am I going to have to re-download the plane again to get the issue fix with the fuel manager app?
Ok Emanuel I agree, from your point of view as 'seller". Statistics are very hard for dreams
But you don't need ten years to make a realistic plane.See the Dash Q 400.
I fly with the Airbus of Aerosoft very often. They are actually very pleasant planes.and I'll buy the A330.
A joke: if five and more years development are promising top detailed planes the future CRJ should be the cream of the crop