Forums
-
Aerosoft | House Of Simulation
-
- 1.8k
- posts
-
- 1
- post
-
- 469
- posts
-
- 20.3k
- posts
-
- 272
- posts
-
- 27
- posts
-
-
Hardware
-
- 146
- posts
-
- 1.7k
- posts
-
-
Aerosoft Flight | Flight Simulation Support
-
- 15.4k
- posts
-
- 5.8k
- posts
-
- 52.8k
- posts
-
- 13.4k
- posts
-
- 38
- posts
-
- 85
- posts
-
- 232
- posts
-
- 264
- posts
-
- 59
- posts
-
-
Aerosoft Move | Game Support
-
- 1.5k
- posts
-
- 53
- posts
-
- 264
- posts
-
- 343
- posts
-
- Updates
- By Mathijs Kok,
-
- 59
- posts
-
- 15
- posts
-
-
Aerosoft Friends
-
- 960
- posts
-
- 541
- posts
-
![Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account]](https://forum.aerosoft.com/uploads/monthly_2023_09/Aerosoft_Social_Media_Profilbild_Neu23.thumb.jpg.03721825e6a434ed4af0c8b2b73a5898.jpg)
-
Who's Online 272 all people including: 5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 266 Guests (See full list)
-
Recent Achievements
-
.thumb.jpg.fb854b646882a73ee6ee3ae8f4ca87b5.jpg)
-
Recently Browsing
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Posts
-
-
By JakobFerdinand · Posted
Exactly! Simbrief is certainly more "pilot" oriented and tailored towards quick planning to "get off the ground" as fast as possible. It's great for many uses, but the philosophy is completely different than PFPX and in my opinion, the two are barely even comparable. Regarding dumbing-down areas of the hobby, I have to completely agree. I've seen instances of a what seemed like a developer misleading customers to justify simplified and unrealistic results in a tool. Real life aviation, especially when it comes to flight planning and performance is extremely complex and complicated, and for many areas expensive programs (and deep knowledge) is required, but the simplification that we are seeing now will intentionally stop people from diving deeper and learning more about these subjects (and I believe, even for commercial purposes). In no way do I intend on "gate keep" flight simming - It's a hobby for everyone, but that shouldn't stop developers from aiming to bring realistic and deep simulations/tools. Unfortunately, I suspect the finacial incentive to keep things simple, and maybe not be very vocal about the fact that they are, is just much larger than catering for those who are interested in deeper/more realistic tools. I hope we will see another in depth flight planning tool some time in the future, but incredibly still, as long as the server and subscription system is kept running, PFPX actually does an incredible job. I really hope this isn't the end for it - flight simming will be much less fun without it. I will try reaching out to Christian through some alternate channels, but currently the chances aren't looking great. I really liked the idea by @EnQof sending flightsimsoft a letter. Perhaps we could gather some signatures from the community to see if we can get them to keep the server and subscription system alive? PS: I wanna give quick shout out to Virtual Performance Tool, which is a developer that is going in the direction of more depth and complexity for flight sim. Those who enjoy PFPX will certainly enjoy their performance tool! -
Could someone please tell me, the (unboxed) dimensions for the Honeycomb Foxtrot Stick (L x W x H)? I can only find 40cm x 13cm x 27cm, what I think are the box size.. Thank You
-
I have done some reading and I can't seem to find an answer to this. Pardon my ignorance if this is pilot error. I am using the CRJ v2 in MSFS 2024 SU4, and when I am dialing in an altitude, either higher or lower, with no other logic modes enabled (either SPEED or VS) the plane will automatically climb or descend. This is especially noticeable on descents from cruise. As soon as I begin dialing in a different altitude from ALTS (in green), the plane will just pitch nose-down. I do not have coupled VNAV enabled in the EFB. As I understand it, the plane should not begin a climb or descent when a new altitude is selected until a mode is enabled (SPEED or VS). Yes, as soon as I touch the ALT knob, the plane just automatically climbs or descends. Are there bindings that might inadvertently cause this? A setting in MSFS 24 that I am missing? Any help or insight is appreciated.
-
As I wrote as a reply to a previous post, I am currently working on support for MSFS2024 scenery-scan via navdatareader (made by Alexander Barthel - the developer of Little NavMap). The reason for this is because MakeRunways (by Peter Dowson) was only able to scan scenery via BGL-files, which are no longer in use for MSFS2024), hence Flightplan Viewer was not able to show the gates matching your active scenery for MSFS2024. I am currently working on having Flightplan Visualizer import the database generated by navdatareader, and I still have a few changes to do, and things to check. But hope I will be able to release a new version within a month or so. To use this new feature you will have to run navdatareader (while MSFS2024 is running, as it extract scenery-date via SimConnect). Basically you "should" run navdatareader whenever you have updated your scenery (e.g. installed a new airport) - just like you in the past "should" run MakeRunways each time you had made changes to your scenery. FlightPlan Visualizer will still default to be using the MakeRunways files you have made yourself, or those bundled with the installer. However in settings you can in the following version specify a path to where you have a database generated by navdatareader. If this database is specified the navdatareader-db will take priority over the MakeRunways-files. There will be a few benefits using the navdatareader-DB over the MakeRunways-files. First of all it can scan your installed MSFS2025 scenery, but it can also scan scenery purchased via the Markedplace within MSFS (MakeRunways couldn't do this, as this scenery was encrypted). MakeRunways didn't fully support unicode, so I had to put in extra code trying to catch when it did something "bad" to the airport-names, which is not an issue with navdatareader. Also as visible in the screen-shot below, hoovering the mouse over a gate, the tooltip will show if a jetway is associated with the gate. -
By EDDFFraport · Posted
I work for the winter operation team and next to S11 there is currently a new cargo positions in the built and Taxiway Romeo will be redone . I am in the hope that they do a update to it after terminal 3 is ready -
By WebMaximus · Posted
Noticed when flying into LDZA how the jetways start moving even before I have come to a complete stop when taxiing into the gate. How can I stop this from happening? Normally and for most other airports, the jetway will not start extending until I have come to a full stop and the jetway is triggered to extend as part of the GSX deboarding. Thanks in advance for your assistance. -
By walter 1967 · Posted
hi i bought fom simarket the addons a318/319 for v5 and v4 i was reqd is possible to install also for v6 but i tried a lot time i tried to change a lot folkder but nothing i get all time error path, like in picture. someone cqn help me??? thanks Desktop Screenshot 2026.01.05 - 15.03.23.76.jxr -
Then, once you have downloaded the XML files, connect the Foxtrot joystick, start MSFS2024, go to Settings > Controls, select the Foxtrot General controls Profile, click the gear icon, and use Import/Export to manage the General controls Profile XML file. Repeat the operation with the Airplane controls profile and XML file.
-
Let me check with the developpers. It may be that it will only install in the standard default folder and disk. I come back later about this.
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics121.8k
-
Total Posts841.6k
-
-
Files
-
