Forums
-
Aerosoft | House Of Simulation
-
- 1.8k
- posts
-
- 1
- post
-
- 469
- posts
-
- 20.3k
- posts
-
- 271
- posts
-
- 26
- posts
-
-
Hardware
-
- 138
- posts
-
- 1.7k
- posts
-
-
Aerosoft Flight | Flight Simulation Support
-
- 15.4k
- posts
-
- 5.7k
- posts
-
- 52.7k
- posts
-
- 13.3k
- posts
-
- 38
- posts
-
- 85
- posts
-
- 226
- posts
-
- 263
- posts
-
- 57
- posts
-
-
Aerosoft Move | Game Support
-
- 1.5k
- posts
-
- 53
- posts
-
- 264
- posts
-
- 342
- posts
-
- 59
- posts
-
- 15
- posts
-
-
Aerosoft Friends
-
- 960
- posts
-
- 541
- posts
-
![Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account]](https://forum.aerosoft.com/uploads/monthly_2023_09/Aerosoft_Social_Media_Profilbild_Neu23.thumb.jpg.03721825e6a434ed4af0c8b2b73a5898.jpg)
-
Who's Online 552 all people including: 19 Members, 2 Anonymous, 531 Guests (See full list)
-
Recent Achievements
-
Announcements
-
Recently Browsing
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Posts
-
By Flightrookie · Posted
Hallo Manfred, iniBuilds hat wohl als alleiniger Hersteller den Beluga ST angeboten, ich habe leider keine weiteren Quellen gefunden. Mittlerweile hat sich iniBuilds aber vollständig dem MSFS zugewandt, siehe hier auch die Nachricht aus dem Forum: https://forum.inibuilds.com/topic/23800-inibuilds-statement-on-x-plane-current-status/ Der Flieger wird auch im Shop von iniBuilds nicht mehr angeboten, über eine weitere Entwicklung der Flieger halten sie sich bedeckt. Gruß Horst -
Moin, die Ramp Start Positionen in der Scenery sind zu einem großen Teil (wenn nicht sogar alle - kann mich an keine Ausnahmen erinnern beim Testen) zu weit hinten. Das führt dazu, das Dickschiffe mit dem Heck unnötigerweise in die Fahrstraßen reinragen: und/oder in vielen Fällen, das die Doppel-Brücken über Kreuz oder gar nicht an den Flieger fahren: XP 12.2.1, Scenery v1.0.2. Gruß, Daniel -
Servus zusammen, ich habe gelesen, dass das Add-On EDDM V2 mit dem MSFS 2024 kompatibel ist. Leider erscheint es bei mir nicht in Aerosoft One. Hat da jemand eine Lösung? Gruß Flo
-
By Manfred Baeslack · Posted
Hallo, ich suche einen Download für den Airbus Beluga ST für XP11. Bei simMarket gibt es eine Möglichkeit für eine Version von iniBuilds. Allerdings wird das als inaktives Produkt angezeigt. Kennt jemand einen anderen Anbieter? Gruß Manfred -
By Ray Proudfoot · Posted
@srcooke, thanks for that Steve. So it’s subsidised by Navigraph. I saw it in use yesterday on a friend’s computer running MSFS20. It looks very slick and suitable for real world routes. But my flight from Tokyo to Heathrow last week via Alaska was hand created in PFPX as the GCR took me over Russian airspace now out of bounds. How would SimBrief planned it? And as for my fictitious Concorde routes such as Boston to Orlando I believe only PFPX will allow the user to create those manually. Once the plan is created I stop using PFPX as the fuel planning etc. is performed by the FSL coding in the sim. -
Simbrief was aquired by Navigraph in April 2021 where Derek the developer still plays a pivotal role. Simbrief remains free to use with a fixed AIRAC that is periodically updated, a Navigraph subscription is required should you require active AIRAC. Without doubt it is an excellent product especially for retrieving routes whether those published by users or now the enhanced realworld coverage. If however you are looking to plan your own routes then PFPX is still far easier to use whereby you can create your own direct links for automatic routing, create and avoid restricted areas and automatically use your defined sub-routes. Whilst me may have lost the online data hopefully the activation server remains active (or an alternative means made available), which was the case when I tested following flightsimsoft.com going offline.
-
By Ray Proudfoot · Posted
@Mathijs Kok, who owns SimBrief? A single person or company? Given it’s free that raises questions about how the servers are financed. -
By Mathijs Kok · Posted
Well, I would say that when you buy a product that has a server aspect and needs online activation, you'd better be sure you believe the company selling it will continue to support the product as long as you want to use it. PFPX was closed a loooong time ago, and any server aspect is at the mercy of the people who made the product. Depending on a legacy product has serious risks. While I loved PFPX, SimBrief, and Navigraph are just the industry standard and are as good as PFPX ever was. I am sure there is some feature SimBrief does not have, but there are a ton of features in SimBrief that PFPX never had. The fact that it is web-based and it's impossible to 'lose' is just one of those things. After all, what advantage has a locally installed application when it needs server data? Might as well live in the clouds. Mathijs Kok PMDG -
By Domonkos Ujhelyi · Posted
Do some of you guys still use the VA system in PFPX? Where you can connect to a VA, upload a schedule, manage the fleet etc. It doesn't work for me, no idea why. I can connect to it, view everything that was uploaded, but when I try to modify anything, it says that connection to the server has been lost. I've tried contacting PFPX support via the zendesk ticket system, but they didn't (couldn't?) help, they said the servers are up and running. -
By Karl-Heinz Kaiser · Posted
Seit einiger Zeit arbeite ich an der Scenery Reichelsheim für den X Plane. Ich muß bißchen inpofesieren da ich keine Bilder vom Flugplatz habe, nur das was im internet zu finden ist. Alle Objekte und texturen sind selbst von mir erstellt worden. Hier ein paar Bilder was schon fertig ist. Wann ich die komplette Scenery fertig habe weiß ich nicht genau. Lg Karl-Heinz
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Forum Statistics
-
Total Topics121.7k
-
Total Posts840.9k
-
-
Files
