This is absolutely true, and I still can’t wrap my head around how no one noticed this during testing, including ToLiss, because this is not exactly subtle. You only need one flight to realize it and a second one to confirm it. The flight model behaves as it should, but it doesn’t seem to be affected by any conditions other than wind direction and wind speed. Leaving aside the fact that the weather in MSFS is quite a meme, there’s a huge difference between that and absolute nothingness. Where are the thermals? Where is the cloud turbulence? Where is the CAT?
This is a €70 product (a price which as far as I understand, will increase soon), and it lacks the most basic features that any default aircraft has. This is not acceptable under any circumstances. An exquisite flight model and rich system depth are of no use to me if I’m flying inside a vacuum chamber. If I wanted to fly on rails, I would reinstall P3D. I hope these issues are addressed in the next patch, because this makes absolutely no sense. This is a huge oversight.
By
Asturr ·
![Laura [Aerosoft]](https://forum.aerosoft.com/uploads/monthly_2026_02/LK2klein.thumb.png.2355135640446de22b75f0b6628f1c15.png)
.jpg.c8e9be23633397c6c430771f8831ce05.jpg)
![Rafi [Aerosoft]](https://forum.aerosoft.com/uploads/monthly_2026_02/Rafi.thumb.jpeg.4a2295ac3b06910d02314bef45e636ec.jpeg)
![Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account]](https://forum.aerosoft.com/uploads/monthly_2023_09/Aerosoft_Social_Media_Profilbild_Neu23.thumb.jpg.03721825e6a434ed4af0c8b2b73a5898.jpg)
