Navigation \ Autoflight

If you want to get some help on navigation and MCDU procedures, here is tyhe place: Please post only one issue per post so we can follow up, do not post a list of question!

207 topics in this forum

    • 2 replies
    • 256 views
    • 3 replies
    • 485 views
    • 5 replies
    • 187 views
    • 9 replies
    • 502 views
    • 3 replies
    • 285 views
    • 2 replies
    • 167 views
    • 9 replies
    • 321 views
    • 3 replies
    • 221 views
    • 2 replies
    • 181 views
    • 2 replies
    • 168 views
    • 4 replies
    • 170 views
    • 6 replies
    • 524 views
    • 5 replies
    • 223 views
    • 8 replies
    • 531 views
  1. Navigraph

    • 3 replies
    • 524 views
    • 3 replies
    • 134 views
  2. VOR Radial MCDU entry

    • 5 replies
    • 274 views
    • 3 replies
    • 152 views
    • 3 replies
    • 212 views
    • 13 replies
    • 836 views
  3. touch and go

    • 3 replies
    • 160 views
    • 0 replies
    • 103 views
    • 7 replies
    • 274 views
    • 6 replies
    • 345 views
    • 3 replies
    • 193 views
  • Posts

    • Would love to see the -60 variant with slightly more modern equipment.
    • To Mr. Herman; My bad Sir on the text box above "EGHH" that was a typo, I mean to type EGLL as you pointed out. Already revise and ensure that it was correct. Thanks.
    • Hi,  I'm currently flying VHHH-EGLL (attached). I have questions about two issues:   In the FP the initial altitude is FL302 (Metric RVSM in China). However, in my aircraft with all these weights and such, PMDG offers me an easy FL322. So how can I get PFPX to offer me FL322 as well? Is it my aircraft performance profile? I'm using the one provided on Airliner Performance.net. Also, Active Sky is my weather engine in the sim and for PFPX. As you can see in the FP the altitude changes dramatically. Why can't I get a normal step climb profile? I have RAD 1902 installed from the downloads section.   I know this is a recurring issue from more people but I didn't find an answer to my situation in those treads.  Thanks in advanced. BAW32 VHHH-EGLL (18-Feb-2019) #1.pdf
    • @Carsten74   Mit der 11.32b1 habe ich in einem bestimmten Gebiet in Japan regelmäßig Crashes. Diese Betaversion hast du, laut deinem Logfile, ebenfalls im Einsatz.   Da ich die Betaversion von 124thATC teste, dachte ich, dass diese Version für die Abstürtze verantwortlich sei, ohne dieses Plugin gibt es die Abstürtze aber auch. Ich vermute jetzt, dass die 11.32b1 etwas wackelig ist. Ich teste weiter und hoffe auf ein baldiges Update.   Das ist eben der Preis, den man für das Vergnügen bezahlt, das Werden einer neuer Version mitzuerleben.  🙂   https://developer.x-plane.com/2019/02/x-plane-11-32-real-weather-fix-gpu-memory-fix-maybe/