Professional Flight Planner X
Support und Diskussionen fur PFPX - Professional Flight Planner X
455 topics in this forum
-
Pinned topics
-
- 0 replies
- 3577 views
-
- 0 replies
- 4195 views
-
- 1 reply
- 4420 views
-
- 22 replies
- 8305 views
-
Topics
-
- 6 replies
- 291 views
-
- 1 reply
- 384 views
-
- 14 replies
- 614 views
-
- 6 replies
- 1061 views
-
- 1 reply
- 612 views
-
- 0 replies
- 591 views
-
- 1 reply
- 702 views
-
- 1 reply
- 657 views
-
- 1 reply
- 934 views
-
- 2 replies
- 1026 views
-
- 2 replies
- 1112 views
-
- 2 replies
- 1004 views
-
- 0 replies
- 987 views
-
- 2 replies
- 1082 views
-
- 1 reply
- 1141 views
-
- 1 reply
- 1132 views
-
- 4 replies
- 1702 views
-
- 3 replies
- 1421 views
-
- 3 replies
- 1517 views
-
- 2 replies
- 1384 views
-
- 13 replies
- 1671 views
.jpg.c98dd25d188383239a2d17ff737ee895.thumb.jpg.37644e43868fdd92a144e0c64d0ce344.jpg)
-
Posts
-
-
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id#map=20/49.37642/8.12099 danke und bin gespannt, was bei "building = " eingetragen werden sollte. Gruß Wolfgang
-
Interesting! I haven't tried VR myself but it would be very interesting for me as a developer to find out what causes the performance hit here. First if all: Do those 75% happen everywhere when flying around in the coverage area or mainly when you're on the ground at Lukla? Does it improve once you get airborne? Bests, Sascha -
HI all, the Fuelplanner is curently being checked to have correct values for all Variants. -
Hi Joop, let me refer you to this thread. There you can find some information about variables and their prefixing. If you have further questions, don't hesitate to ask.
-