Hardware with Aerosoft CRJ for MSFS
All discussion on Controllers and thrust levers
272 topics in this forum
-
Pinned topics
-
Axis and Oh's Templates for Aerosoft CRJ 550/700 - with cockpit animations and improved throttle binding 1 2 3 4 7
- 172 replies
- 17.2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 451 views
-
- 106 replies
- 11.2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 2.6k views
-
- 0 replies
- 758 views
-
- 0 replies
- 1k views
-
Topics
-
- 2 replies
- 736 views
-
- 33 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 1 reply
- 133 views
-
- 4 replies
- 420 views
-
- 23 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 2 replies
- 298 views
-
- 8 replies
- 376 views
-
- 0 replies
- 169 views
-
- 4 replies
- 398 views
-
- 3 replies
- 238 views
-
- 7 replies
- 454 views
-
- 2 replies
- 278 views
-
- 1 reply
- 619 views
-
- 4 replies
- 414 views
-
- 4 replies
- 381 views
-
- 1 reply
- 204 views
-
- 3 replies
- 555 views
-
- 3 replies
- 342 views
-
Popular Topics
-
-
Latest Posts
-
Da dieser Thread beantwortet wurde haben wir ihn geschlossen. Wenn Sie weitere Fragen haben können Sie jederzeit einen Neuen öffnen. -
By Mathijs Kok · Posted
Sorry, not able to make comments on release date and further plans. -
Even if the A330 does not use AVX (which is highly possible), I recommend moving to a CPU that has all the instructions that are in use today. It's not a matter of devs saying "oh let's use CPU instructions so someone with an i5 750 can't use our bird". Instructions in processors are often like shortcuts (or wildcards) for many tasks that would otherwise demand more time and resources. an i3-8100 (yes, it's a bit old but if your budget is low it might be a good choice) has good performance and already has almost all the necessary instructions. I understand if you say "oh but my i5 750 runs MSFS at 25fps", yes, but just the fact that you have that problem with AVX today shows that those minimum requirements were put there for more than just CPU power. Sorry if I deviated the topic of conversation, I'm as anxious as everyone else to see that A330. Cheers and thanks to Mathijs for all the time he takes to answer the forum and give us those beautiful pictures. -
Moin, danke hat geklappt. Eintrag aus der Registry entfernt. Oslo ist wieder einsatzfähig
-
Mathijs said back in mid October when someone asked which aircraft they are going to develop after the A330. Someone gave the suggestion A321LR. And Mathijs answer was that the A321LR would be a logical chocie to develope after the A330. I may have misunderstod things so someone can maybe correct me if i'm wrong
-
