Diverse Systems
Engines (FADEC), Flight Controls, Fuel, Electrical, Hydraulics, Communication, Equipment, APU, Doors, Landing Gear, Web server
Subforums
-
- 663
- posts
-
- 238
- posts
412 topics in this forum
-
Pinned topics
-
- 33 replies
- 10649 views
-
- 2 replies
- 4976 views
-
- 4 replies
- 5934 views
-
- 0 replies
- 5214 views
-
- 0 replies
- 16664 views
-
Topics
-
- 8 replies
- 1141 views
-
- 2 replies
- 1531 views
-
- 2 replies
- 4247 views
-
- 3 replies
- 2924 views
-
- 4 replies
- 3203 views
-
- 6 replies
- 3037 views
-
- 1 reply
- 2737 views
-
- 1 reply
- 2804 views
-
- 0 replies
- 2705 views
-
- 0 replies
- 2697 views
-
- 0 replies
- 2695 views
-
- 2 replies
- 2825 views
-
- 0 replies
- 3106 views
-
- 1 reply
- 2820 views
-
- 0 replies
- 2618 views
-
- 0 replies
- 2616 views
-
- 6 replies
- 3921 views
-
- 2 replies
- 2843 views
-
- 2 replies
- 5788 views
-
- 0 replies
- 2767 views
-
Posts
-
While testing the Kosice airport is in progress, I decided to announce a new project that I started to work on. This is Poprad-Tatry LZTT Airport. Today, the runway is ready, airport facilities are being created. I plan to finish Scenery in January 2020. I will periodically talk about the progress of work. So far, a few screenshots. -
I have been working on a route from EGBB to FSIA using both PFPX and Navigraph Charts and have come across a discrepancy. The routing from the Mogadishu FIR/UIR takes me along airway UM651G to ESTOK and from there on UM651 to ANVIX as I have depicted here: MURAL UG651 KUSUB UM651G ESTOK UM651 ANVIX T137 ROUTY This routing appears to be fine in Navigraph Charts and in Skyvector but PFPX shows a discontinuity between the KATHY and ESTOK waypoints and will therefore not accept the route. PFPX will only accept the routing if I insert a DCT between KATHY and ESTOK. Is this an error (or an omission) in the PFPX database? Mike
-
With this in mind will this A330 be fully compatible with the new MS Simulator because if not P3D could conceivably become obsolete before its time and, as has been argued in this forum, manufacturers like Aerosoft will produce exclusively to the new Simulator? It will also put further doubts in ones mind about moving from FSX to P3D Mike
-
There’s no support in the section where you first posted, so I moved this for you. Are you asking about using a third party add-in 2D panel? Someone more know knowledgeable on the ‘Bus will be able to better answer, but if you’re asking about s panel made by someone else, I’d say say it’s not fully compatible. The Aerosoft Airbus is only fully functional unmodified by third party add-ins and support is only for an unmodified product. -
-