Jump to content

raptor84

Members
  • Posts

    66
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About raptor84

Recent Profile Visitors

1485 profile views

raptor84's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

2

Reputation

  1. Thanks for the tips masterhawk. I did try all PD entries (PD, PBD, PBX) and it wasn't working for me when I wanted to insert the second waypoint (AMB/200/17). Just kept getting "NOT ALLOWED" Now that I updated to the current version (v1.4.2) I'm going to try again.
  2. Hello, I wanted to know how many PBD (Place/Bearing/Distance) can be inserted into the MCDU on Sec F-PLN page??? As per the attached EOSID chart, I was attempting to insert the routing from SCEL rwy 17L for an engine out procedure. I was able to insert 1 PBD (AMB/172/4) however, when I wanted to insert a couple more (i.e. AMB/220/17 or PBD01/220/17) the MCDU told me "NOT ALLOWED" Also, when it comes to intersecting a radial as described in this procedure, how would one insert that?? I know in the A320 FCOM, it says: The pilot can identify a waypoint by: 1). A Place-Bearing/Place-Bearing (PBX). The waypoint is defined by the interception of 2 radials from 2 places. Thanks Using P3Dv4.5 A320 Prof. (1.3.1 I think but haven't updated to newest version yet)
  3. Yes, example 1 and 2 can I do in the advance Speed/Alt/Holding section. Didn't know that. thanks for pointing it out. As for example 3, not sure if its only used for military. I've tried it a few times at work and the function works. I think its just an easier way to select the altitudes you want to cruise at, to only focus on those altitudes rather than having to specify it with a long line.
  4. Was that all what they did??? Doesn't seem much although, yes, I agree with you that it's at least something is happening.
  5. Hello, I don't know if there will be an updated version of PFPX but if there is, I would like to see the user have the option of specify the flight level restrictions and associated altitude constraints. At work, we use Jeppesen Jetplan to create out flight plans and while the system provide us with the flight level changes (which is nice), we can also change the flight level changes in the Profile command line. Example 1: 330,DQB,350,PMM,370 Fly at flight level 330 to DQB, 350 to PMM and 370 the rest of the way (until Top of Descent). Example 2: 330,DQB,350,PMM Fly at flight level 330 to DQB, 350 to PMM, and optimize the flight level the rest of the way (no input after PMM). Example 3: 310,350,DQB Fly anywhere between the flight levels 310 and 350 (inclusive) until waypoint, DQB. Select optimal altitudes the rest of the flight. In the current version of PFPX, I don't see how I can do that. In the Route section of PFPX, its to general. Thank you.
  6. Yes, I see now and now things are good. It appears I was having a brain fart, LOL.
  7. Not true. I select RNAV28L, then DYMND5 then INYOE (as per the chart and the way I coming from based on my route) and I get what you see in the attached screen in first post. Trust me when I say I tried multiple times different ways with different approaches, just in case if I missed something. Nothing works. All the approaches appear to be missing waypoints in MCDU. I have to manually insert the waypoints between ARCHI to HEMAN. I thought of this and tried it on a real A320 earlier and don't have that problem. I further checked the txt file of airport within the C:\Users\Rich Dogg\Documents\Aerosoft\General\A3XX Navigraph\proc folder to see if the waypoint where there or not and of course, they are. But for some reason, they don't appear in the MCDU for the selected approach.
  8. Nothing happens. It just goes from ARCHI to HEMAN.
  9. Hello, I wanted to know why the MCDU is not display all of the waypoints for the approach. Screenshots are attached. Today I decided to do the RNAV (GPS) Rwy 28L into KSFO, beginning from the ARCHI/waypoint. However, in the MCDU, it displays going from ARCHI then to HEMAN. What happened to the rest of the waypoints in between?? In the A320/321 configurator, the Navigation Data source was selected to NavDataPro and when I changed it to Navigraph, it still resulted in same issue. I running Version 1.4.1.0 in P3Dv4.5
  10. How about in the A320??? Is there a way that can be implemented??
  11. Hello, Quick question. I wanted to know if it was possible to have the terrain be depicted on the FO ND when the Terr button is turned on while on the CP ND, show only the weather??
  12. I agree. We all would like to hear an update status of some kind. There are features that should be implemented. IMO, it appears Aerosoft is more concern, or putting higher priority, on scenery rather than giving us an update regarding PFPX.
  13. Got it, its a P3D problem. Do you happen to know what that name was for the Timezone bug in P3d, that way I can look it up.
  14. I have the A320 prof with latest version installed in P3dV4.5 and I notice that the clock is displaying the incorrect UTC time. Example, I'm doing a flight from KORD-KPHX in which the current UTC time is 1823z/13Oct20 however the clock in the A320 shows it as 1923z. Why??
  15. Hello folks, REVISION LIST Version 1.1 > Added 2 ASC_CC_CAB_Movie sound files, ASC_CC_CAB_Movie(Blank) & (live). Ensure to read the Read Me First file for instructions and the note indication in the feature section regarding the 2 ASC_CC_CAB_Movie files. Feedback is always welcomed. A320 UAL cabin announcements - v1.1.zip
×
×
  • Create New...