Modeling \ Texturing \ Animation
Question of comment on the way the aircraft looks? Here is the place. Please post only one issue per post so we can follow up, do not post a list of question!
425 topics in this forum
-
- 15 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 5 replies
- 154 views
-
- 10 replies
- 330 views
-
- 1 reply
- 80 views
-
- 10 replies
- 366 views
-
- 9 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 5 replies
- 131 views
-
- 1 reply
- 92 views
-
- 2 replies
- 132 views
-
- 3 replies
- 145 views
-
- 3 replies
- 414 views
-
- 5 replies
- 452 views
-
- 4 replies
- 261 views
-
- 20 replies
- 550 views
-
- 8 replies
- 427 views
-
- 5 replies
- 288 views
-
- 13 replies
- 620 views
-
- 4 replies
- 378 views
-
- 7 replies
- 447 views
-
- 91 replies
- 7k views
-
- 2 replies
- 537 views
-
- 0 replies
- 321 views
-
- 12 replies
- 530 views
-
- 11 replies
- 483 views
-
- 3 replies
- 451 views
-
Popular Topics
-
-
Latest Posts
-
By Mathijs Kok · Posted
Well yes, that is exactly what I mean. If you can't make money, a logic reply is to attack the platform when your money has gone. But basically that is telling your (potential) customers they are crazy. Not a solid business model. If you have a business you sell what your customers want to buy. -
By Mathijs Kok · Posted
I might have been a tad vindictive, but you are pessimistic, lol. 99% of people on this forum are just normal people. If they are unhappy they will let us know, if they are happy they might left us know. And that is fine. My issue was that in our forums, that we clearly position as company forums, not 'public', we have seen a lot of attempts to influence people with less than honest arguments. People complaining about things we do not support in P3D V5 while their own products barely support basic P3D V4 standards. People who talk down MFS wile we know the have been refused access to MFS beta programs (Microsoft is pretty strict, if you have a history of piracy, malware etc you won't get in). I understand these people are not happy about MFS, but just say why. Saying it is just a 'game' is something people will remind you about in 18 months. The basic fact is that every company who is not fully on board with MFS has a reason for that. Some because they feel P3D still has a bright future, others because they simply do not have the resources. Some other companies might be locked on developments that are not future proof, some other because they have made update promises that are hard to keep. Most of these things are not hard to guess or hard to find. If you see a commercial negative comment about MFS, just check. If the company has problems updating to new version (or even a hotfix) of P3D it is clear they are hardcore outside the SDK and will have a seriously hard time in MFS. That might lead to very cool P3D products but it means the development is very locked to P3D. -
By Flightrookie · Posted
Nein, ich setze mittig auf der Piste auf und die Maschine wandert nach rechts ab. Wie ich schon geschrieben habe, kann ich das abdriften auch nicht mit dem Seitenruder abfangen. -
Awesome post Mathijs as usual. Gotta love how candid you are about things, and I really appreciate your insight. Quite simply, fans of certain sims are panicking hard because they see developers jumping ship, while I'm guessing a few devs have gotten way too comfortable with simulators that never brought or required innovation, and feel like they have to attack MSFS because it requires new work instead of recycling the same assets over and over. The level of trolling, vitriol, and pettiness has become pretty literally crazy and on the official MSFS forums it's even worse. Just today the CEO of another company (who I won't name, but conveniently, they work a lot on P3D) spammed a bunch of unprofessional vitriol against MSFS and the SDK on a thread dedicated to... Christmas.🤔 and got himself (rightfully) flagged. Suffice to say, I won't be doing business with them from now on. There's plenty of professional, constructive, and balanced devs out there, and my money is better spent supporting them, instead of wasting it on products made by the toxic ones. -
By ArcticMarkus · Posted
I doubt a few missing features will be much of a deal breaker, the MSFS community is practically starving for a study-level airliner, and the Aerosoft CRJ is definitely looking like it's going to satisfy that craving. Looking forward to learning more about this release next week
-
