Shop Questions & Answers
25 topics in this forum
-
Pinned topics
-
- 0 replies
- 1.6k views
-
Topics
-
- 4 replies
- 115 views
-
- 0 replies
- 105 views
-
- 5 replies
- 259 views
-
- 3 replies
- 155 views
-
- 9 replies
- 742 views
-
Wann wird der neue PMDG 777 installer für P3D und das neue 777-200 ER Expansion Pack verfügbar sein?
- 2 replies
- 250 views
-
- 0 replies
- 339 views
-
- 4 replies
- 392 views
-
- 1 reply
- 304 views
-
- 2 replies
- 538 views
-
- 4 replies
- 1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 2 replies
- 887 views
-
- 4 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 2 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 2 replies
- 6k views
-
- 4 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 3 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 0 replies
- 3.6k views
-
- 0 replies
- 3.4k views
-
- 0 replies
- 3.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 3k views
-
Popular Topics
-
-
Latest Posts
-
By Firestorm108 · Posted
Indeed the older 7's and 9's would have slats 25 deploy when selected flaps 20, this is actually something carriers can go in and change for fleet commonality (my old regional went in a tweaked this so all the aircraft deployed slats on the "new" schedule). Created a great rumble having slats 25 out at flaps 20 on the older ones though Hopefully this is something the simulator frees up for the team in the future! -
By Firestorm108 · Posted
Solid, I'll look into using SpadNext for that for now, hopefully it's something they look into making a toggle option on the EFB. -
By Firestorm108 · Posted
And all I'm saying is that functions the opposite of the real aircraft. From a dev standpoint super easy small mistake to make, literally just assigning the =1/=0 variable to the wrong position in the code. With all the things they had to do to make this aircraft function it would be easy to miss, but functionally it is incorrect. It took me a hot second when I first got it to get the audio to work because it's the opposite of real life. -
Update: For those who use the Navigraph AIRAC database in the CRJ, the problem with multiple approach transitions having the same name has been solved, and the fix will be included in the next AIRAC update (cycle 2105) which should be available from Navigraph on May 21st -
Bei mir schweben sie ja auch, selbst in einer Vanilla-Testinstallation ohne irgendwelche AddOns schweben sie. Rein theoretisch müssen sie aber immer auf derselben Höhe sein, wenn das Mesh sich nicht ändert - da dürfte also irgendein Bug zugrunde liegen, derartiges gab es ja gelegentlich schon anderswo aber eine Ursache ist bis heute unbekannt.
-
