Fernbus - Support
9 topics in this forum
-
Pinned topics
-
- 0 replies
- 11.2k views
-
Topics
-
- 0 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 2 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 3 replies
- 4k views
-
- 3 replies
- 9.2k views
-
- 2 replies
- 6.9k views
-
- 3 replies
- 7.1k views
-
- 2 replies
- 6.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 8.6k views
.thumb.jpg.1f3dcc7bc6adf06b68ed3faa53b2c127.jpg)
-
Popular Topics
-
-
Latest Posts
-
-
By Pete Dawkins · Posted
we we have done but Microsoft refused our requests. Perhaps Aerosoft would be prepared to refund their share of the sale? -
By 9012 Pilot · Posted
It would not matter. RNP just represents required performance. A typical RNAV approach would be 1.0 until the FAF to which it switches to 0.3. Most SIDs and STARs are RNP 1. I would expect that CRJ RNP system would maintain ANP of well below 1.0 in either case. I think this is just a case of a too tight of a turn resulting in a big intercept angle. The first waypoint of this SID is a flyover waypoint making it all that much larger. I am quite happy actually that the FMS recognized from the AIRAC that it was a flyover waypoint. Most waypoints are flybys meaning the FMS leads the turn to the next outbound track depending on speed and angles involved, however not all waypoints are flybys. Flyover waypoints are marked a a circled star on the charts. For those you need to fly over the waypoint before making the turn for the next track. -
You are always free to get in touch with Microsoft customer support and request a refund. As it seems you are not willing to wait anymore this is the next logical step. But you have to deal with Microsoft as you have bought in their shop, not with Aerosoft. -
Hello, I have a small issue with the product, the external lights are always on. They are in the off position in the cockpit, but when I look outside I see everytrhing on (With the landing and taxi lights as an exception) Any fix for this? Nils
-
