Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. amahran
    64 bit simulators. Hands down. It's such a simple change, but opened up possibility for lots of innovative features that would have otherwise been memory-prohibitive.
  3. Campino
    Das gleiche Problem habe ich auch....
  4. adream11 adream11 joined the community
  5. DaveCT2003 started following Vol1-In P3D and Best all around feature
  6. DaveCT2003
    I was thinking back to how things were for us before P3D was released. Now, this isn't about P3D, but that's a great line of demarcation for my question for you guys. QUESTION: What is the single best thing we flight simmers have now that we didn't have 6 years or so ago?
  7. DaveCT2003
    They aren't missing, we removed them. But good catch my friend! I'll make a note that the page numbers need to be removed. Many thanks!
  8. X_LORD9 X_LORD9 joined the community
  9. Jaron Cohen Jaron Cohen joined the community
  10. amahran
    Then how do you eliminate that trailing discontinuity? That's what I'm talking about, an attempt to delete the discontinuity in the legs page breaks the legs page. If you try to fix the damage by deleting the elements, it breaks the simulator and causes a CTD. And I know it's the wrong way to do things, I'm bringing up two topics here: 1) There's a trailing discontinuity that can't be erased 2) It's possible to CTD the sim very easily. EDIT: To clarify, I thought this was an experimental update. It's not, I also have 1.2.3.0 installed.
  11. Redgreen21 Redgreen21 joined the community
  12. Marten started following EGCC SAM jetway issue
  13. Marten
    It's supposed to be a fitness training for passengers before they sit in an airplane for hours
  14. Eagle_For
    Hello In the documentation Vol1-In P3D v1.2.4.0 pages 37 to 44 are missing. Raymond
  15. orbmis
    What is the minimum version of P3D required for the newest latest version 1.2.4 of the Airbus? No mention of this in the announcement. thanks, mike
  16. DrShadow
    And now i noticed that the mcdu is constantly doing calculations altough i havn't inserted or changed anything
  17. Today
  18. Heinz Flichtbeil
    Hallo Micha82 und Othello, klärt das Problem zwischen euch beiden bitte per PM, nicht öffentlich hier im Forum. Das ist nicht mehr Zielführend... Wenn Ihr zu einem Konsens gekommen seid, dann könnt ihr das ja hier wieder posten.... Gruß heinz
  19. Heinz Flichtbeil
    Hello, I will forward this to the developers.... Greets Heinz
  20. DrShadow
    yes, did new start. And set fisr the buss to turn around. And now i checked the A320, and it is the same. This morning, with the experimental version, it was no problem. I deinstalled the old version with the aerosoft deinstaller, installed the new one, did reboot and now it isnt working anymore.
  21. DaveCT2003 started following MCDU routing problem after update to 1.2.4.0
  22. DaveCT2003
    Did you reboot after the update?
  23. DrShadow
    Hi all I have updated just rightnow my busses to 1.2.4.0. Now i cant connect routes in the mcdu propperly anymore. As soon is i want to connect a short flight from LSZH to LSGG or LSZH to LOWW my whole routing dissapear. I try to explain, as an example LSZH to LSGG in A319 Take off via RW28, WIL3V departure and in LSGG ILS22, as soon as i want to connect WIL with PETAL WP my routing in LSZH dissapears. Example in the picture. The same with LOWW. Here is my routing.. and now i'd like to connect WIL with PETAL, as a simple routing.. And now this happens. Does anyone have an idea? (btw, new NDP is updated) Thank you for your help Cheers Pascal
  24. Theodoros Kasimis Theodoros Kasimis joined the community
  25. Secondator
    Correct. The logging parameters only activate when the issue is deteceted.
  26. Hoffie3000
    Is there an update only for FSX? I have no idea what "experimental update" you mean. Last Version for the CRJ´s is 1.2.3.0 so far I know. Do not use the leg page for building a flightplan You can fill in a Rwy in "ORIG RWY" then you see automatic related SIDs or STARs to that Rwy. Airways on the left side, Waypoints, VOR, Nav Aids on the right side Regards, Wolfgang
  27. Hassan Norusi Hassan Norusi joined the community
  28. Jhon Alexander Osorio Jhon Alexander Osorio joined the community
  29. DaveCT2003 started following General Discussion, Radio Chatter Room, Reviews and and 2 others
  30. mopperle
    Because we believe this topic has been answered we have closed it. If you have any more questions feel free to open a new topic.
  31. mopperle
    Because we believe this topic has been answered we have closed it. If you have any more questions feel free to open a new topic.
  32. nclarkmci nclarkmci joined the community
  33. MartinF started following EGCC SAM jetway issue
  34. MartinF
    Just bought EGCC Manchester for XP11 the other day and I don't know about you, but when I buy a payware scenery that boast about SAM integration and movable jetways, I don't expect to see this: No idea if it's like this for every stand, but stand 25 is definitely like that for me. 🙃
  35. Miles Blount Miles Blount joined the community
  36. Micha82
    Dachte ich ehrlichgesagt auch immer. Ich hab meine Region (4 Kacheln) mit google zl 18 gemacht und das sieht top aus, wenige Wolken und ich konnte keine dunklen Farben feststellen bisher. Zuvor hatte ich Bing benutzt da hatte ich viel zu viele Wolken und jede Menge Farbunterschiede. Das gilt aber jetzt nur für die Region 50/10-11 und 49/10-11, wies in den Alpen aussieht weiß ich leider net. Achja und ZL18 braucht natürlich viel Platz, glaub die 4 Kacheln haben um die 130GB.
  37. kyurem900
    On my end the exclude fule is showing as being 1KB, is it supposed to be this size? I looked at the afcaed thru ADEX (did not change anything just looked) and from this it looks like the exclude file is not working as it should be
  38. Markus Lohmann
    Vielen Dank für die Antwort
  39. zévatech
    Hello OPabst, Oups... sorry, I saved this addon on my computeur with my p3dv4 addons folder!!! Thank you for the info for Professional version. best regards
  40. Rolf Bauer
    Vielen Dank Hermann und Micha, das ist eine ebenso ausführliche wie anschauliche Erklärung. Werde ich morgen gleich in die Tat umsetzen. Gruß Rolf
  41. aerowulf
    Ich hatte eigentlich gedacht das sind Satellitenbilder und keine Luftbilder. Welche Provider ist dann am besten geeignet für die Alpen.
  1. Load more activity

  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?

    Sign Up
×
×
  • Create New...