Airlifter 60 Posted May 31, 2010 Share Posted May 31, 2010 To bring up the subject again about the avioducts crossing the A4 highway and the Hoofdvaart, why can't it be done like with Munich? Check these screenshots: http://www.forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?showtopic=20827&view=findpost&p=230458. It does add so much to the realism! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Er!k 572 Posted June 1, 2010 Author Share Posted June 1, 2010 To bring up the subject again about the avioducts crossing the A4 highway and the Hoofdvaart, why can't it be done like with Munich? Check these screenshots: http://www.forum.aer...ndpost&p=230458. It does add so much to the realism! Indeed! Absolutely stunning! I am only curious how AI traffic will behave when crossing the bridge... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delta777 272 Posted June 1, 2010 Share Posted June 1, 2010 Indeed! Absolutely stunning! I am only curious how AI traffic will behave when crossing the bridge... Oliver has already stated, that the AI traffic is only able to correctly cross the bridge as longs as the bridge is on airport level, in case it is above the airport level (like in Leipzig) the traffic will go through the bridge and not across. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robinn 4 Posted June 1, 2010 Share Posted June 1, 2010 But as you can see here: The bridge is at airport level, isn't it? And here: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delta777 272 Posted June 1, 2010 Share Posted June 1, 2010 But as you can see here: The bridge is at airport level, isn't it? I never said it isn't, I only explainded what happen if it is not! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robinn 4 Posted June 1, 2010 Share Posted June 1, 2010 I never said it isn't, I only explainded what happen if it is not! Yeah oke, lets hope the designers do there best to make this just like those screens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Er!k 572 Posted June 2, 2010 Author Share Posted June 2, 2010 Yes indeed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evertie 1 Posted June 2, 2010 Share Posted June 2, 2010 It's two weeks after the 19th of May, I hope we get some news about the update today! Evert Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Guenter Zehnel 77 Posted June 2, 2010 Administrator Share Posted June 2, 2010 Hello, we just received the final data for the FSX version as well as for the FS9 update of Amsterdam-Schiphol. We have to perform some final tests and to program the installer and we hope we can release both within the next week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Farrington 5 Posted June 2, 2010 Share Posted June 2, 2010 Thank 4 the update Guenter cant wait 4 the update 4 FS9 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc-homer 3 Posted June 5, 2010 Share Posted June 5, 2010 what wonderful news to hear, looking forward to be able to fly to EHAM without performance impacts or freezes... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaun Fletcher 570 Posted June 10, 2010 Share Posted June 10, 2010 This update requires an installed version of Mega Airport Amsterdam for FS2004 (V1.00) Update 1.10 includes: ATC Tower has been enhancedDistance to most objects has been corrected so now you will see buildings from a further distanceTaxi signs added *Backside of terminal B now has the gates that were missing.Adds on gates changed to the correct ones.The visitors balcony on the main terminal has been improved.New stand alone exclude file for those that wants to manipulate with the AFCAD file.Corrected Microsoft logo on the new Microsoft building.De-icing apron now enhanced with tower and drive trough parking also with more correct apron markings, ladders and other objects.Winter now looking better with a more stronger frosty look.Rwy lightning has been improved as good as possible for now.Some thought that roof textures were blurry, they have been sharpened a little.All in all some cosmetical issues have been dealt with here and there. Available form the Updates section at www.aerosoft.com 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jörg 1 Posted June 10, 2010 Share Posted June 10, 2010 Hi Shawn, thank you for your Info. Fast as always. I did not see any Info on the German support section so far. Some things have been inproved so far, as you stated. What I have found out, during a quick look at Amsterdam: The taxing aircraft are bouncing still on some parts of the taxiway (like you were taxing on gras surface). I hoped that this issue would have be solved first. Maybe it will be fixed in the future. Very best regards, Jörg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimon 3 Posted June 10, 2010 Share Posted June 10, 2010 Hi Shawn, thank you for your Info. Fast as always. I did not see any Info on the German support section so far. Some things have been inproved so far, as you stated. What I have found out, during a quick look at Amsterdam: The taxing aircraft are bouncing still on some parts of the taxiway (like you were taxing on gras surface). I hoped that this issue would have be solved first. Maybe it will be fixed in the future. Very best regards, Jörg This issue might be solve only by disabling default AMS terrain in scenery.cfg. The issue is very common for almost ALL of the sceneries where default terrain/photoscenery exists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arnaud 5 Posted June 10, 2010 Share Posted June 10, 2010 This issue might be solve only by disabling default AMS terrain in scenery.cfg And how would you do that, Dimon? I'd appreciate some help here because it might well solve and issue I have at Schipol with DBS walk-and-follow, while moving all around the scenery the camera wont stay on ground level and I suspect it has something to do with this. I just hope it's not due to the 'under the sea level' status of Schipol. Thanks for the update Aerosoft people, I am looking forward to installing it tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimon 3 Posted June 10, 2010 Share Posted June 10, 2010 Arnaud, I'am at work now and I'll get the update this evening. Meanwhile C9 EHAM has exactly the same problem with taxi bouncing. Thus, you need to disable (manually) photo layer of Amsterdam via scenery library menu in FS2004. In case if you have UTE_GEX, it won't hurt your aesthetic feelings about EHAM and Amsterdam presence in FS2004. I don't have DBS (I still use old fashioned Active Camera). However, since AMS has negative elevation ( minus 14 if I remember correctly), in ACamera you need to manually adjust camera height from 6 feet to 8-9 feet. This will usually solve the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robinn 4 Posted June 10, 2010 Share Posted June 10, 2010 The update is a really nice! Found a fould though, That should be VM Also WK = VK and WL = VL Not a big issue but something for the next update. This should be A parkings: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Jack Hill 5 Posted June 10, 2010 Share Posted June 10, 2010 There are still lots of faults in the scenery. Autogen where it doesn`t belong, missing ILS approaches for RWY 36/18, wrong radiuses at the gates and firm ground at many places of the airport is also missing. Performance has improved, nevertheless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimon 3 Posted June 10, 2010 Share Posted June 10, 2010 Use Jim Ville approaches for EHAM. Even thought they were created for C9 EHAM, they are still OK for this scenery as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Jansen 1 Posted June 10, 2010 Share Posted June 10, 2010 Unfortunately still some bugs in the scenery after the 1.10 update. Just to mention a few: - B-pier numbering odd side is not correct. Missing 1 gate/aviobridge on the odd (eastern) side and numbering on bridge, pier and apron is different from each other at all positions. - B-pier numbering even (western) side missing on apron. - B30/B40-stands have been renamed to A. - I am still missing a lot of taxi signs. What bothers me is that the numbering of the B-pier can simply be found in the AIP or other apron charts. How difficult can it be just to check how many parking positions the pier has and double-check the numbers before releasing a bugfix in which this is mentioned as fixed? Mark 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mc-homer 3 Posted June 10, 2010 Share Posted June 10, 2010 what's with the performance and the LODs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Er!k 572 Posted June 11, 2010 Author Share Posted June 11, 2010 My biggest issue is still the incompatibility with the default underground of FS2004. Very annoying! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Jack Hill 5 Posted June 11, 2010 Share Posted June 11, 2010 My biggest issue is still the incompatibility with the default underground of FS2004. Very annoying! I agree 100% here. This is an absolute nogo !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SQ024 2 Posted June 11, 2010 Share Posted June 11, 2010 Shaun, Can you please clarify? The download page for the update shows a download size of 90Mb for the update, but the actual download is 15.5 Mb. Is this a typo or a mistake in the packaging? Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psolk 80 Posted June 11, 2010 Share Posted June 11, 2010 I agree 100% here. This is an absolute nogo !!! Can you elaborate on this for me, I am not sure I am following... Thank you, -P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts