We got a new video from World of Aircraft: Glider Simulator and are asking for some alpha/beta testers! Check this post.

 

Jump to content

Emanuel Hagen

admins
  • Content Count

    10037
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    110

Everything posted by Emanuel Hagen

  1. This is an issue with the AFCAD or parts of the apron texture not showing correctly. If you look closely, what you see there is the apron and taxiways. Or at least parts of them. I keep seeing it from time to time at high definition sceneries when flying the FSL Airbus (never saw it with any other addon). Others where this happened to me include, in no specific orders, ORBX Edinburgh, FSDT Chicago and Aerosofts EGLL. Not quite sure how to solve it to be honest, when trying to recreate it I have never been able to. On my system these were all one time occurences.
  2. Guys really, some people seem to be pendantic about finding issues and claiming xyz is wrong because of some streams of a betacopy you saw. Gents, with all due respect, you haven't had the aircraft on your copy, the streamers all make mistakes with the SOP's and they, as well as you, are hobbyists. There are a lot of pilots with thousands of hours on our team helping us to get things right. We trust those people to tell us if they don't like something. If I read reports like "there are problems flying a straight line" I can only shake my head. All you have seem is a stream. You haven't even seen the aircraft for yourself on your own sim. Instead of wasting developers time with stuff like this, which could very well be caused by miscalibrated controls or by issues with the stream, etc. I suggest you all to just sit back, relax and wait for release. I'm not saying there are no issues, but the quality of "bugreports" here is so low, you're basically wasting the developers time which could very well be used to improve actual issues which we know about and which we have to fix. Hopefully before release and not in service packs. Followup comments like "I saw issue xyz in stream abc" will from now on be deleted. Repetition might lead to moderator action, in the worst case if somebody does not want to understand it might lead to posting restrictions or removal from the forums.
  3. Well better don't tell certain other developers.... it might very well happen at that price.
  4. Most certainly the operator thinks it's a Challenger 850: https://www.airx.aero/jet-type/challenger-850/ Keep in mind they are basically the same aircraft with just minor differences.
  5. These are not CRJ's, but Challenger 850's. Similar airframe but not the same aircraft.
  6. As always, focus is on the pilots perspective, not the passengers'.
  7. Please send an e-mail to support@aerosoft.com, they will be able to help. The forum is not the right place to discuss account problems as some personal information might be needed to verify your identity, etc. which should never be posted in public.
  8. That's totally incorrect. It depends on the software version installed in the Airbus. Just like on the 320. Please get the facts correct before posting "have you seen on YouTube the real cockpit landing". You can safely assume when developing an addon a developer does know what the real aircraft does and what not.
  9. Not that I'd know of. Heck in some they just spawn on the runway... GSX should seriously think about implementing a function to tell it where to spawn the busses. Shouldn't be too hard I'd guess, they can tell other vehicles where to spawn so why not the busses as well.
  10. First people demand releasedates, then they say they won't buy it anymore because it's all a great conspiracy if you can't hold that releasedate. Aerosoft should really do it like PMDG and just don't anything about the progress of the addon and simply release it one day.
  11. To be honest, I would not know of any way to do it. On the other hands side though I am almost 100% sure somebody somewhere on the internet will have written a program which allows exactly what you want to do. Might be worth a search.
  12. There will be no need to keep the current version, this is not an update but a completly new version. It will include all features the previous version had.
  13. You are right in that our radar doesn't look as fancy as the foto you have shown. This however is for a simple reason: Weather in your sim simply isn't as fancy. We read directly from the sim and show you 100% exactly what is in the sim. The problem with that is, the weather in the simulator, even when using Active Sky or other weather addons, is plain unrealistic. Therefore you won't see a realistic weather front on the radar. There is none in your sim. During development of the radar we thought quite a bit about faking the indication and what you see how already is tweaked to look more realistic, however we still want to show you what is actually in your sim. When you enter a precipitation zone on our radar you'll see it'll start to rain. Tools like Active Sky still go back to the time when no radars were available. They are build for impressive optics, not for realistic frontal systems. And this became ever so obvious when we developed our radar. But until they improve the weather injection into the sim to mimic real systems you will not see real systems on our radar either. Looking at Microsofts latest previews I am hoping the new MS sim will change this. They seem to have gone to great depths to mimic the current real weather and precipitation. This will hopefully open up some whole new levels!
  14. .per are performance files for PFPX. Have a look at the installation instructions on airlinerperformance and you'll learn how to install these files.
  15. As far as I know EGLL is not in the US (yet). The USA, as much as they'd like to be, are not the whole world
  16. Indeed, be aware that while you hear the bags rattling in the overhead bins, etc. in the cabin you don't usually hear that in the flightdeck. At least on my aircraft, other types might be different.
  17. There is a manual included in the box and it contains the instructions to download the driver. I don't see the problem.
  18. Boeing can't do it either, it's really only MD and Bombardier who do it. I woulnd't know what to use it for anyway.
  19. If I'm not totally mistaken a manual entry for a between constraint is not possible.
  20. If you did not turn on the anti ice and colleacted a couple of tons ice on your aircraft this might be a normal level. You will have iced up and thus lost performance. Normal cruise levels and performance of the CRJ are comparable to other jet airliners like the 737.
×
×
  • Create New...