!! Windows 7 no longer supported !!

As Microsoft will stop supporting Windows 7 on Jan 20th we will be unable to test any of our
products on that platform. It may work, or it may not, but no guarantees from our side. 

Jump to content

macroth72

members
  • Content Count

    649
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by macroth72

  1. Hi, I already posted them in post 118, I think I will update my signature ;-)
  2. Hi Clutch! Yes, it's big fun flying in and out of the city an so much to explore. I flew some extra rounds for you with the NGX. I don't say there are no stutters with all turned on, but in my opinion it runs pretty smooth with all those details. I took some extra shoots around the city. The screens are together with FSDT's KLAX & the NGX PS: Didn't found the Bison's yet, but I will have an eye for them
  3. Hi, nutzt Du zufällig Summer 2012 schedule in UTX 2? Das Problem hatte ich nämlich auch (bereits in der Beta). Das lag aber nicht an der Szenerie, sondern an UTX. Ich habe dann den summer 2011 schedule erneut installiert, dann hatte ich auch wieder traffic in Heraklion. Da gibt es zahlreiche Bug reports im UTX Forum. Leider nimmt das dort scheinbar keiner so richtig ernst und ich bin etwas angesäuert, da die ja schließlich Geld für die Updates verlangen. Hier ist nicht nur LGIR betroffen, ich habe auch auf zahlreichen anderen Aiports keinen Traffic mit der 2012er Version.
  4. Of course, in short I use a I5 @ 3.8 Ghz, 8GB DDR3 RAM, 1GB 5770 Ati card, Win 7 64 bit. So nothing spectacular. Also using Ultimate traffic 2, REX Essential (with 1024 textures). I think this is a matter to find the correct FSX values to get fluid fps and to lower some details if approaching with a high end aircraft. I think Sascha did some great work in perfomance optimization.
  5. OK, me again. I tested FSDT's KLAX together with the NGX enabled and the frames are still good flyable (also with traffic). On my system I have between 17 and 25 fps with lighter aircrafts around the city, With the NGX I get around 15 to 20 fps over the city and KLAX, ONly by approaching the skyscrapers, the frames go down a bit by passing at low altitude, So, this seems really nice.
  6. I have FSDT KLAX running also and it fits very good into the scenery. I can check together with the NGX later.
  7. Here are some more beta shots, which give you a nice overview how huge this city is... Some more after departure from Catalina airport...
  8. 4 girls with 4 beer in one shot, that will be hard to beat ...
  9. I also don't think, MS will lock Windows and just use their own store. The post sounds very dramatic, but I couldn't imagine those drastic changes. I also don't see any reason, why I should swithc over to Windows 8 at the moment, my WIndows 7 platform is running rock solid and quick, why throwing that away? There are not such problems as with Vista, so no need to hurry. And games running on Linux sounds far more unrealistic to me, as there are so many different version flowing around. This would cause a tremendous ammount of support for any serious commercial "game" product. And which company will take that risk? Those "handygames" may work, but a flightsim? I don't think so... I think Windows 8 will not get that big thing and not so many user will switch over. I see no reason to do that...
  10. I wasn't aware about the PMDG thing, is it so? Can't remember I used it before..?! It was just the biggest I had in my hangar. Everything else looked to small from that distance to get the girls on the pic.. ...and of course it is a MD11F
  11. Ich würde mal sagen, dass das diverse Ursachen haben könnte. Wende Dich doch an den Hersteller. Ich bezweifle das Dir von Aerosoft geholfen werden kann, da Du ja im Simmarket eingekauft hast und Aerosoft auch nicht der Hersteller ist.
  12. Ah ok, didn't know that Konrad. Thanks for the info. I'm still struggling with myself, if I should waste some money and give Prepar3D a try .
  13. I wouldn't be so sure about that. I think if Prepar3d now gets in a price range that is really affordable for every simmer and they improve the engine in a serious way (which actually seems so to me), I think this can't be ignored by any developer. The fact I could use many of my FSX addons is the most valuable part for me. Other sims are no option the next years, because I have spent so much on addons I won't buy twice or again for another sim. I think a smoother and advenced FSX platform is the thing, most simmers could hop on. No Flight or X-plane will do this in my opinion. X-plane is absolutely no option for me. I really see no advantage over FSX and as mentioned before, I will never throw all my addons away. So I will have an eye on Prepar3d how it progresses.
  14. Oh yes, not thinking one second about this other scenery, the screenshots say all about it. Very sad, this happened again. I hope this won't hurt your fantastic product too much! You can count on my buy
  15. My words, duckbilled, just a few moments quicker...
  16. I REALLY hope this won't lead two fantastic companies into struggle. I'm using AES for a long time now and when I'm in the mood to run some big Metal, AES is always in the boat as it is a must for me together with big airports and big aircrafts. The new version also looks fantastic. I like the "localisation" with moving jetways and different spoken accents on some regions. I don't regret any AES credit I bought and I understand I have to pay for new airports as it is much work to do on those.So I also will support AES in the future. On the other side, I tried GSX at the Hawaiian airports (I also own most FSDT destinations, as they are one of the best) and it looked really good. I like the look and the animation stuff but I will test arround with it. I think if I (or you, the companies) find a way to get both running side by side (AES for the big ones and GSX for the "not so supported" or the less important), it would be good for everyone. Since GSX stays a pay once product, I still can use some credits on AES if i like. But I don't want to spend money on and on in two addons. So peace to all and try to share the cake.
  17. Lad Dir doch erst mal die Freeware liveries von McPhat runter und teste. Dann siehst Du ob's auf die Performance drückt! Edit: Ich sehe grad im Betreff, dass Du ja die Freeware meinst. Probiers doch einfach aus, wenn's nicht gefällt, schmeiss sie wieder runter ?!
  18. Sooo schnell würde ich nicht auf die iFly springen, ist Geschmackssache. Ich hatte beide (hab für die iFly wieder zurückgegeben) und nachdem ich die PMDG mal in Benutzung hatte, habe ich die iFly nicht mehr angerührt. Irgendwie läuft da alles viel runder, ist ruck zuck programmiert und man kann wunderbar alles vom FMC steuern ( Panel state, Beladung und Treibstoff und muss nicht mit externen Loadmanagern rumhantieren). Gerade für den "Feierabendflug" geht dass alles sehr fix....
×
×
  • Create New...