Jump to content

Emanuel Hagen

admins
  • Content Count

    9838
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    103

Everything posted by Emanuel Hagen

  1. We use P3D radios, so whenever Lockheed upgrades P3D to support 8.33kHz ours will also have it.
  2. There is a lot of work involved in creating other engine variants, based on past experience developing the A320 series you can take a couple of months per engine or aircraft variant. This said, keep in mind it was never said it will not be done! All that has been said is that initially the A330-300RR will be developed. If there is demand for it and if it is feasible to do so you can be sure other versions will follow!
  3. We have had the discussion about failures often enough by now, the summarized result is: The vast majority of simmers only use them once or twice and then do not touch them anymore. Seeing that the amount of work needed to simulate those failures would pretty much doubt the product price we do not see it justified and therefore do not model failures.
  4. Which of course does not mean you can not paint a Delta livery and fly it nontheless. How many simmers flew the 777-200LR instead of the ER, not even talking about the different engine versions which were available on the -200ER compared to the -200LR
  5. The resolution of the textures tells you nothing about how the addon will look in the end. It depends on how much fuselage is mapped to a certain space of textures. An easy example to make it easier to understand: Imagine you have one single 4096px texture and try to squeeze the complete aircraft in it: There will not be much space left per aircraft part. Now imagine having 48 1024px textures: That gives you twice as much space for the actual aircraft than the single 4096 file. Therefore the 1024px texture would look more detailled. Stefan is doing an excellent job to give you a detailled aircraft, just look at those close up previews already seen (for example those of the cargo hold or the wheel well) or wait until you have the final product in your simulator and I can assure you you will not be disappointed.
  6. No, why would you want to do so? Please please please, read before posting. It's not been long since I commented with exactly what you want to know.
  7. A clear sign of P3D's roots in Microsoft logic which was basically Boeing logic. In Boeings pressing the brake pedals is the way to release the parking brake. We'll see if something can be done here, but it has quite a low priority.
  8. In the past it worked somewhat with EZDOK, never tried it with Chaseplane though. Maybe the Avatar mode can help here, I never really started to fiddle with it and get the grips with the avatar.
  9. Der BIAS macht nichts anderes als die berechnete Treibstoffmenge mit dem BIAS zu multiplizieren. Hast Du einen Cruise Fuel Bias von 4% eingestellt, dann wird die berechnete Treibstoffmenge für den Reiseflug mit 1.04 multipliziert, es werden also 4% mehr Treibstoff für den Reiseflug berechnet, als aus den Daten des PFPX Aircraftprofiles hervorgeht.
  10. You do a walkaround after all before every single flight!
  11. Just replying to this one, despite not being one of the advisory pilots for the Airbus. I fly a direct competitor to the A320 though To be fair: I have no clue what the navlights, strobe lights, etc. look like on the ground. There are two main reasons for that: 1) On the ramp when doing the walkaround check it is always so bright that no kind of reflections of the lights whatsoever is visible, even when walking directly under the wing. When looking out on the ground with the strobes on they reflect so bright that for a short moment simply everything becomes bright white while they are lit. No idea where that starts or ends. It's just too bright for my eyes being used to darkness. Keep in mind our cockpit lights are almost completly dimmed down before taxi to adjust our eyes to the darkness outside. 2) I never get to see them. I know what the taxilights, turnoff lights and landing lights look like because I see those all the time. Did I mention already that they look different on every single aircraft? Even on two aircraft which were build within two weeks of each other they look different and that is already three weeks after they went into service. Why is this? Dirt on the glass, differnet sets of LEDs used, age of the lamps, etc. In my opinion there is no right or wrong here, whether they are a bit brighter, reflect a bit further, etc. The only thing I can really not stand is those really large areas lit up by the navlights in some other addons. It might look like that on a camera with the exposure turned up, but not in real life as seen by the human eye. As said, I never saw the nav light reflections on my aircraft yet when looking out from the flightdeck.
  12. Gerne Maggy. Nur um das nochmal ganz klar zu stellen: Im echten Nürnberg ist es genauso. It's not a bug, it's a feature!
  13. Bei vielen Flughäfen dieser Größe ist es normal, dass ein Tankwagen kommen muss. Die Tanke in Düsseldorf wird zB auch nicht genutzt und es kommt immer der Tankwagen. Zapfsäulen sind eher etwas für die kleinen Flughäfen.
  14. They have by far not the same performance. Maybe a similar range, speeds and cruise levels, but that is about it. Believe me, we do not say they are totally different aircrafts just because we don't want to make the A340. We believe the A340 is a very nice aircraft and personally I would love to have one on my sim. But economically it's just not worth it.
  15. Which producttitle is shown in your purchase confirmation e-mail or on the title of your box?
  16. Alright, so we got the aircraft. Now we need the addon as I asked earlier on already
  17. Which aircraft addon is this about?
  18. Please follow the steps given in the first post of this thread.
  19. In fact this is actually a feature and not a bug. We left this small easter egg in just in case somebody does an incorrect fuel planning and does not want to divert. Therefore nothing to be fixed here, it's there on purpose. Surely there must be something else happening on your system that causes such little fuel consumption. It is definitely not normal and it does not seem like there are many other customers encountering the same issue which makes it unlikely (though of course not impossible) to be a bug.
  20. And to be fair Dave, I am one of those who was unhappy with the MD80 soundset, so I bought the TSS soundset and included it in my maddog. Now I hear my engines and all is good. What most, if not all, simmers forget is: We sit in the cockpit wearing ANR headsets. Well, at least most of us do, I know at least one colleague flying with an 80€ GA headset, but that's a different topic. Under my ANR headset I hardly hear the engines at all. It even goes so far that sometimes in cruise I put my Bose ANR headphones over my aviation headset, just to get that additional ANR. Then it becomes totally quiet. Well, at least except for the aircraft sounds picked up by our microphones which are then returned into the system. When the intercom is turned off though you don't hear a thing anymore. Total silence! And honestly, that's how I like it the most at work Yet when sitting at my sim at home my flatmates usually complain my sim is too loud. That's life, isn't it?
  21. Do you have and use a joystick as outlined in the system requirements? If you don't have one please get one as you can not control the AIrbus with the keyboard, but need to use a joystick instead.
  22. There is no completed list as of now, Lufthansa, Virgin and Cathay Dragon have been confirmed though. Right now there are still many paints to be completed so we can not tell you exactly what will be in the final release yet. There is a dedicated thread with wishlists for repaints in our forums, if you search for it you can post there and request whatever you like. Please run a quick search through the thread before posting though as chances are that your particular paintwish has already been requested by someone else. In that case simply upvote it to show you'd also like that paint.
  23. The right ND is a copy of the left ND at the moment, same for the PFD btw. Thus you'll only see the VOR1 indication.
  24. I have never heared of this issue yet, nor do I recall seeing any customer with it. My best bet would be to reinstall the latest client of your P3D (client only, not the full sim!). Whatever causes this issue is likely to happen somewhere on a deeper level.
  25. I don't think you can completly exclude VORs from the route. Why would you want to do so? There is no reason for it.
×
×
  • Create New...