We have at this moment problems with e-mails coming to us via Microsoft servers (Outlook, Hotmail, Live, etc). We are in contact with Microsoft to solve this issue.

Jump to content

OPabst

Developer
  • Content Count

    13531
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    80

Everything posted by OPabst

  1. Is only the airport area not snow covered or the complete area of the photoground in the area around? For the airport there seams an Issue with the scripts, will be fixed next update.
  2. Because we believe this topic has been answered we have closed it. If you have any more questions feel free to open a new topic.
  3. Ok, must correct me, have just a look into the afcad source (thanks internet access from holidays to my home) and there is a water runway far north included, to deactivate a old Ils. But I could not say, why ATC will assign it, its blocked for all and only 1x1 meter. You need to wait 2 weeks until I am back at my PC to check that.
  4. All afcads you talk about are part of the scenery and should not be removed, they are needed. But non of this have a water runway included, so I have no idea, where your ATC will get it from. The navigraph navdata should no be the source here, they should not update any Afcads as I know.
  5. Yes, in the sim-wings folder you will have only one, but we could not know what other addons you have, which may provide afcads for GCTS. Orbx maybe? Other addons for Tenerife Sur, maybe not removed complete.
  6. Because you have another AFCAD active. The original Afcad of Sim-wings has no water runway included.
  7. Hö, HF3 ist deutlich stabiler, lohnt sich.
  8. Ja, ohne HF3 gab es immer Probleme mit zerschossenen PBR Polys. Bitte erstmal den P3D auf HF3 updaten. Kleine Tip: 1)Erst über Startmenü-Einstellungen -Apps nur den P3D Client deinstallieren und am Ende sagen, dass man die Lizenz/Regierung nicht freigeben will. 2)Dann den den kompletten P3D deinstallieren. 3) Dann den komplette Installer mit Stand HF3 in das gleiche Verzeichnis wieder installieren ohne vorher irgendwas manuell zu löschen. So bleibt alles erhalten, auch die Regierung der Lizenz und Addons, zumindest solche, die nicht orginale Datein des P3D verändern.
  9. No, that‘s not as designed. One of the following issues can generate this: - other afcad for munich active - Insertion Point of Orbx set wrong ( not below the airport sceneries like Munich) - Original Munich Afcad replaced or modified with non V5 SDK compatible tool. The Taxibridges are not filled with mesh, when the scenery is correct installed and the system correct configured.
  10. Ok, but the remove of the Dummy could only be a workaround, as this will generate Missing Objects allerts in the background, which maybe delay the load in a way, that the real reason for the CTD is delayed so that it not happen. The Dummy is the same as in he SODE version 1000, so only the model MDLs was changed for the T1 jetways. The rest is the same. We have removed SODE Version 1010 from the website until second haft of August, when I am back in the office to check the creation of the MDL. The workaround to remove the Dummy.bgl is maybe not critical and the missing object warnings are not reported, as long as the related Parameter is not set in the Prepar3d.cfg But, when there are still CTD even without the Dummy.bgl, the only support way is to reactivate the default jetways part of the product. The SODE jetways are a free option, not part of the product and not supported by Aerosoft stuff here in the forum.
  11. Yes, I will not change anything next two week because of holidays , so take all time you need.
  12. Ok, is it only at this gate, or does the other gates docking correct by the same aircraft? And maybe you can have a look into the afcad with ADE v4, if this gate is only a Dummy with radius 5m to place the jetway? Some Gates are only included to attache the jetway, but should not be used, as there will be a conflict with the gates beside used for larger aircrafts. The gate 203 could be such one. (I am out of the office, so no access the the data and Sim)
  13. Otto, please go back to the Sode 1000 and try again. The verion 1010 for Sode is removed from the site for the moment.
  14. Yes, we like to know, if the Sode Version 1000 has the same issue. If not, we remove the 1010 directly and will check it later, when back in office. Keep in mind, the product is not contain any Sode parts, the use off the free offered Jetways is on your own risk, even when we will check, what going wrong with 1010, if 1000 works.
  15. http://www.sim-wings.de/SUPPORT_SODE.htm the top most entries are related to EDDM, so maybe refresh your brower cache or clean you glasses
  16. Sorry, von HDR aus war nie die Rede, HDR Brightness Regler von 1.0 runterdrehen auf was weiß ich 0.7 Irgendwie hab ich das Gefühl, man will nicht zuhören und sich mit dem Thema HDR, Bildschirmeinstellungen nicht beschäftigen, Das hat jetzt nichts mehr mit der Scenery zu tun, sondern wie konfiguriere ich mein P3D sinnvoll. Ich bin raus hier und genieße meine Urlaub.
  17. Wenn alles zu hell ist, kann man natürlich mit der HDR brightness etwas runtergehen, bis es passt. Und vielleicht ist ja auch der Monitor vom PC einfach etwas zu hell, da kann auch ggf. noch tunen. Spielt halt alles irgendwie zusammen.
  18. Verstehe ich auch nicht, wir verwenden das seit Jahren in allen V4 und v5 Scenerien für die Sode jetways und hatten noch nie ein Problem damit. Ist auch nicht logisch.
  19. Die muss auf Bgl kopiert sein, also mindestens als BGL vorhanden sein. Dafür darf die EDDM_LIB-Jetways nur als .off existieren. Die Dummy kopiere ich bei SODE-ON von der off auf die Bgl und lasse die off stehen als backup. Bei OFF wird nur die Dummy.bgl gelöscht, wenn die off da ist. Die Dummy hat leere unsichtbare Objekte mit den gleichen GUID‘s, damit die im Afcad enthaltenen Jetwayplatzierungen ein Objekt finden. Es kann also durchaus sein, dass der P3D Probleme bekommt, wenn beide files nur als .off da sind.
  20. Was für ein Flugzeug denn? Habe auch gelesen, dass es mit dem Default f15 passierte, mit anderen nicht.
  21. Da dieser Thread beantwortet wurde haben wir ihn geschlossen. Wenn Sie weitere Fragen haben können Sie jederzeit einen Neuen öffnen.
  22. Könnte es sein, dass du mal ein anderes München installiert hattest und noch eine Sode xml davon existiert. Die doppelten sind definitiv nicht von der Sim-wings scenery oder dessen Sode file, die stehen schon falsch und das M logo haben wie nie auf dem jetway gehabt
  23. Without HDR on, the situation as you and your friend have is possible. Try it by switching HDR on, set brightness to 1.0. The you maybe can reduce the brightness later a littlebit.
  24. Simple question:Did you have HDR on, if yes on which values? The sim has alot of parameters, which effects the visual.
  25. I vote you both up, because that is the correct intention: when you are a flightsim interested person, that use the Sim to simulate a flight, you have not time to read numbers at the door somewhere in the near of the gate you park. When you in the approach, you see the runway and at night the runway and approach lights, when this are „default“ and far away from real, then it is a BUG, you always have intensively in your mind, as it is not what you need or expect. (The most people never see the original lights as pax, but know all about how it should be, lol) When I start flightsim in 1984, the sim has only lines, the rest must happen in the brain. Now we must look twice to check, what is a photo, what is a screenshot of the sim. Above you have not often this problem How nice is the technique today, but you can only realize it, when you know the beginning ( and the real sims with 5 million $ visuals)
×
×
  • Create New...