Rafal Haczek

Erich, There is a dedicated request thread. Please post your suggestions there: http://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/topic/84640-what-if-you-like-to-propose-a-project/&page=92

Yes, it has. That's why I will hide your request, following this thread's rules. By the way, Martin, what is the problem to check? Regardless of the number of pages, it takes a few seconds! Use the forum search engine which is located in the upper right corner of the page: I will also hide my post some time later as I want you to read it first. Enjoy the weekend!

If this is a WIP, my brain cannot even imagine the final result!

First Holgi, now DetCord. It is so great to have higly talented artists just around the corner. DetCord, this Maersk looks so great, that once you release it, it will probably make me fly my hangared 777 again. Thank you!

I don't know, Chris. See the Merriam-Webster definition of a painter: Definition of PAINTER : one that paints: as a : an artist who paints b : one who applies paint especially as an occupation Of course in these categories Holgi is the 'a' case. A reason why I prefer the term 'repainter', though it's the 'texture artist' that seems to sound most rewarding.

I concur with what Holgi wrote. An excellent repaint in an excellent image!

Requested already even on this page over your posts! Please spend 10 seconds to check existing requests. If this thread becomes long and chaotic, nobody will even read it, which I am sure is not what you want. By the way (sorry for a little off topic but I always like sticking to facts): The first A330-200F operator was Etihad Crystal Cargo (2010). Then there was Hong Kong Airlines (2010), then Turkish Airlines Cargo (2010) and finally MASkargo (2011).

The fact someone doesn't reply to your email does not necessarily mean he did not get it. Sometimes people get a lot af similar emails and you really have to wait and/or sometimes they are not interested.

Asking for release dates, more details, more images is almost always useless, when we got something to share you will see it here! Posted by Mathijs Kok

ICAO: EPWA NAME: Warsaw Chopin Airport TYPE: Payware FS: FS9/FSX DESIGNER: Drzewiecki Design LINK FS9: http://secure.simmarket.com/drzewiecki-design-epwa-warsaw-chopin-airport-2015-fs2004.phtml LINK FSX: http://secure.simmarket.com/drzewiecki-design-epwa-warsaw-chopin-airport-x-fsx-p3d.phtml AES 2.40

They have already been requested. Please check before posting or else this thread will soon become very long.

I'd say Cera Sim Bell 212.

That's correct. I see now this is the case with Skytraders.

I've typed 'Skytraders' into the search window... ...and found this: http://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/files/file/1631-airbus-a319-cfm-a320-sky-traders-vh-vhd/

There is no release date for Brussels just as there are no release dates for any Aerosoft products. Once they are getting close to release their preview threads' status is changing and you will just see/read it is being released.

jenstt, believe me, such posts don't make it any faster for a product to be released. An old popular (disliked by some simmers) saying 'it's ready when it's ready' is very true. It is clear that developers, just like potential customers, want the product out as soon as possible. Before it is released and sold, they don't make money, just invest their time and potential in it. But they don't want to sell a product which they don't feel is fully ready. So who wants a rushed release? There are some from time to time if you look around. Are they really good then? No, everyone complains.

As explained many times in these forums, such dates are given only for business reasons. If there is a decided release date, it will be announced here.

If you use the search bar (top right), you will get this request (#225) together with Oliver's comment: http://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/topic/50084-aes-airportrequest-post-only-here/?view=findpost&p=323876

Al, looks like it is in both locations. However I still can't see the v3.

Plus if you flew from DD EPMO, it means you have the Warsaw City product active. It is a very huge and detailed addon basen on photoscenery, so it will raise VAS, which may lead to OOM's. So flying to heavily detailed sceneries like Thessaloniki, I' rather have it deactivated and choose another departure location.

Emilios, What about making it possible (for those who want) to use the airport only, without the city? I initially thought it is enough to deactivate the Thessaloniki X_2_Scenery folder. But I can see some airport bgl's there (ThessalonikiX_airport1, ThessalonikiX_airport2 and ThessalonikiX_airport3), so I am not sure on that. Can you confirm? I am also not sure on how deactivating the landclass folder (Thessaloniki X_3_LC) could affect the airport itself. Of course that is no solution for any problem. And cuts off what seems to be a very attractive part of the product. But it is a temporary suggestion for those simmers who experience some OOM problems and would like to fly to/from the airport in the meantime.

Fantastic from you, Emilios, to come up witch such a huge patch so quickly after releasing the product! σας ευχαριστώ!

Like everyone else posting in this thread you need to read the rules and apply to them (e.g. requesting one airport only or checking if it wasn't requested earlier): http://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/topic/50084-aes-airportrequest-post-only-here/?p=103025