Herman

Several posts above quoting Mathijs' post with images had the pictures (only) removed to make reading easier and save screen space. When commenting on future posts that include images, simply include the text only as a courtesy to other readers. Thanks in advance.

Probably not. According to this post in the official MFS forum, it was a nav data update: Small update - Navdata - Community / News and Announcements - Microsoft Flight Simulator Forums

The search is over. It's already been found and acknowledged: Aerosoft Aircraft: CRJ (for MSFS) - Page 11 - Previews of Unreleased Products - AEROSOFT COMMUNITY SERVICES

A number of posts were hidden since they were focused on how great/bad MFS and P3D are relative to each other, and a couple of resulting personal affronts. This thread is about a preview of the Brussels International product and not a particular sim. As Mathijs notes above, "....let's not open that can of worms here." Thanks all for staying on topic.

I can't answer for the time but the date is easy, as it's right there in the header. "Valid through 30.11.2020" is the European way to write "Valid through November 30, 2020." "Through" would be the common dictionary definition.

Always worthwhile to start at the beginning before asking questions 😉 Here's the answer from the first page: Aerosoft Microsoft Flight Simulator developments - General discussion - AEROSOFT COMMUNITY SERVICES

Where you first posted is support for the new (2020) Microsoft Flight Simulator, not any earlier versions. This is redirected to the 32 bit Airbus support area, since you seem to indicate you think it's more that than Pro ATC.

Because we believe this topic has been answered we have closed it. If you have any more questions feel free to open a new topic.

Let's see what Mathijs wants to add. I see you're aware of the impact of an NDA, and we appreciate your understanding if there's nothing more that can be said.

I would say the answer is "No." There's no difference really between that and an open beta, which Aerosoft just doesn't do. Other developers/software houses do so for good, as well as not so good reasons. It made sense for Asobo/MS Game Studios with MFS, but for different reasons than exist here. This question has been asked about other projects in the past, and this sums up the answers in the past. It's certainly not the case that Aerosoft needs the early income, which has been used as a reason by other developers to "pre-release" add-ons.

We have dedicated sections of the forum for A3XX issues instead of "Aircraft General." Please reply with which version of the Airbus you have and I'll move this for you. I would have guessed the A320 Pro, but the latest version is 1.4.0.1, not 1.4.1.1. There are others much better at troubleshooting the A320 than I am, but as a general observation, what you're seeing is far from typical given a few thousand users, so it's most likely that it's something in your system. If the A320 is the only one you see this with, it could simply be that it's more demanding than other add-ons. Ple

Which sim?

Actually, it was and in the very first post too 😉 Aerosoft Aircraft: CRJ (for MSFS) - Previews of Unreleased Products - AEROSOFT COMMUNITY SERVICES

See also this related thread over on the Orbx site. Using a translator in your browser should make it readable for German speaking readers.

Welcome to the Aerosoft forums. Your question is a good one. The top picture is most likely a contrail caught by the aerial photo, and it's a safe bet that the ground shadow and oblique view of the wind turbine is present everywhere there's a wind turbine. That's one unavoidable aspect of photoreal scenery backgrounds. However, it would require manually "digitally painting" out any artifacts to achieve what you're asking about. For the wind turbine and shadow, there are dozens, and for each one, since sun and photo angle makes almost every one different, an automated solution isn't likely. Wh