Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted February 22, 2007 Aerosoft Share Posted February 22, 2007 Is it an photograph or is if FSX? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skydvdan 2 Posted February 22, 2007 Share Posted February 22, 2007 Is it an photograph or is if FSX? FSX. How is the performance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wedge 5 Posted February 22, 2007 Share Posted February 22, 2007 yeah FSX for sure the ground is not good enough yet for a photograph and the building still miss a bit of details but anyway looks good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted February 22, 2007 Author Aerosoft Share Posted February 22, 2007 FSX. How is the performance? Amazing, most testers have solid 20 fps certainly those with Intel Duo core cpu's, we seen some lower numbers an AMD chips, something in the scenery really favors the Intel. All the issues that make FSX slow (layered ground, vehicles, most AI stuff etc) are absent and all objects are manually placed. It is like being in FS2004, just a heck of a lot better looking. No joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobdeVries 2 Posted February 22, 2007 Share Posted February 22, 2007 When is the FS9 version scheduled for release? Rob Well? It would be nice if someone would answer this question. Not everyone is flying FSX you know... Thanks, Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kofi 0 Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 Well? It would be nice if someone would answer this question. Not everyone is flying FSX you know... Thanks, Rob I *think* that this is a pure FSX release.....(I could be wrong though) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EDOT-TH 0 Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 Well? It would be nice if someone would answer this question. Not everyone is flying FSX you know... Thanks, Rob All I found was a german statement: "Da neueste Techniken verwendet wurden, ist diese Szenerie vorerst NUR mit dem FSX kompatibel. Eine FS2004-Version wird etwa 8 Wochen nach Veröffentlichung der FSX-Version folgen." Says that approx 8 weeks after release of Helgoland for FSX the FS 9 Version will follow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayKae 0 Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 IF it really is coming for FS9 .. I will buy without hesitation the second it comes out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted February 23, 2007 Author Aerosoft Share Posted February 23, 2007 IF it really is coming for FS9 .. I will buy without hesitation the second it comes out There will be an FS2004 version eventually, but to be 100% honest, without all the FSX goodies it will not nearly be as exiting (and it will have about the same framerate on FSX and FS2004 on the same hardware) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobdeVries 2 Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 That's good news thanks guys. And as I don't have FSX, I don't know what I'm missing...so I'll just go for a good scenery....I guess I can land on a static frigate as well... Thanks again, Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Wopp 172 Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 It's Friday It's H-day It's the day Helgoland is released That's the topic above this forum. But i cannot find the files. Did it sunk? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EDOT-TH 0 Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 I'm hitting "F5" on the aerosoft page every 10 seconds... i can't stand anymore delay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasa 921 Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 That's the topic above this forum. But i cannot find the files. Did it sunk? Stay tuned. The day is not over yet. Sascha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayKae 0 Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 Thanks for the reply Matthijs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinny 0 Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 Amazing, most testers have solid 20 fps certainly those with Intel Duo core cpu's, we seen some lower numbers an AMD chips, something in the scenery really favors the Intel. All the issues that make FSX slow (layered ground, vehicles, most AI stuff etc) are absent and all objects are manually placed. It is like being in FS2004, just a heck of a lot better looking. No joke. That's what I'm getting and better. I have an Intel Core 2 duo and I've got it capped at 26 FPS and I'm getting anywhere from 19 to 26. I turned on my FPS counter just to see what I was getting, but turned it off again after a very short time. The entire area is 100% smooth and stutter-free. By the way, the little campfire is awesome to watch! :wink: I crashed trying to get a closer look at it. Puppy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayKae 0 Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 Thank you for the reply Matthijs .. I now have it for FSX but I will be using FS9 for quite a while still so I will get it for FS9 as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
![Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account]](https://forum.aerosoft.com/uploads/monthly_2023_09/Aerosoft_Social_Media_Profilbild_Neu23.thumb.jpg.03721825e6a434ed4af0c8b2b73a5898.jpg)
Recommended Posts