Jump to content

Emi

Administrator
  • Content Count

    10156
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    110

Everything posted by Emi

  1. It would have been good to use a random frequency as ATIS frequency though. Not having any ATIS available isn't quite right either, even though the sim itself doens't support D-VORs.
  2. HI, 100ft ist viel zu hoch um den Schub zu schließen. 50ft sollte die größte Höhe sein, sonst wirst Du zu langsam. Das Resultat siehst Du ja.
  3. Hi, your flightplans have the wrong format. They need to be .flp for the Airbus to read them. Default simulator flightplans don't contain enough data for the Airbus, so an own format is used.
  4. Berlin Brandenburg International Airport
  5. Don't spread fake news, Steam has not released any MSFS version. They have the same presale as others.
  6. The solution is quite easy: Fly faster. You're flying the backside of the powercurve.
  7. Die 737 (und meiner Kenntnis nach auch alle anderen Boeing Flugzeuge) haben standartmäßig 240/xxx drinstehen, da VNAV eine 10kt Overspeed Marge toleriert, bevor es anfängt zu korrigieren. In meiner Airline ist es SOP die 240/100 auf 250/100 zu korrigieren, da VNAV für gewöhnlich genau genug fliegt um die 250kt auch einzuhalten. ...und zur Not sitzt da ja immernoch der überbezahlte Knöpfchendrücker, um die Einhaltung zu garantieren.
  8. Wobei das auch nicht in jedem Luftraum gilt. Schau dir mal an welche Luftraumklassen es wo gibt und in welchen Klassen das Limit gilt. Dann weißt Du, ob es für deinen jeweiligen Flughafen gilt oder nicht.
  9. An der Stelle übrigens noch die Notiz, dass die echte 737NG solche Speed Restriktionen problemlos einhält, vorausgesetzt der Wind in der Descent Forecast Seite stimmt mit dem realen Wind überein.
  10. Zur Zibo kann ich nichts sagen, aber generell: Wenn der Flieger verlangsamt, lass ihn das tun. Wenn sie immer zum selben falschen Zeitpunkt zu langsam wird, dann gib ihr doch eine größere Höhe auf der VNAV DES Seite ein. Mach aus den 250/100 doch zB 250/110.
  11. Was Oliver damit vermutlich sagen will: Der Installer ist zwar für v4 upgedatet, aber die Entwickler haben die Dateien selbst nicht angepasst. Aka die Szenerie läuft zwar in v4, nutzt aber nicht die entsprechenden Techniken.
  12. Low bandwidth is something totally different than not being connected to the internet at all.
  13. Emi

    Radial Fix Info

    Hi, as far as I can see it works when entered on the left MCDU, but not on the right MCDU. Can you check that?
  14. Yes there is. Have a look into the manual for an explanation.
  15. Hi Yuval, as you correctly figured it might indeed very well be the weather engine. Those speed jumps on the PFD you mention are most certainly wind changes (there is nothing else that could cause this), so the weather engine is involved. P3Dv5 has some wind issues which have to be overcome by the weather engine. Active Sky does that, but if your weather engine is not P3Dv5 compatible then chances are it doens't. Now why does that maybe only effect the Airbus? There could be several factors involved. 1) Many aircraft developers don't simulate high altitude effects o
  16. ...solange man nicht zwanghaft versucht Fachbegriffe ins Deutsche zu übersetzen und damit seine halbe Firma blamiert...
  17. The thing is, what is "better"? I agree that EA looks pretty darn nice if you look at it on screenshots. But actually flying in the sim it has severe limits. For one it can't transition smoothly to new weathers. Then it still has very limited (3?) types of clouds. Then, I'm flying at 450kt ground speed and I'm overtaken by clouds in cruise? What?! EA is a nice demo of what's possible with a new engine. I kinda see it the same way as the Dx10 Preview back in FSX days. Looked nice, but was pretty buggy. In my opinion a good sim is made mainly by two points: Usabil
  18. Which of course you know just less than 24 hours from its relesae...
  19. You sent those E-Mails one hour and one minute before opening this thread...
  20. In my opinion threads should not be closed only because the moderator *believes* they have been answered. Only once the customer *confirms* the problem is solved or after a certain period of time (say two weeks) without an answer they should be closed.
  21. Things like these are best discussed by E-Mail as personal data and payment data will be needed which should never be posted in public. Chances are that maybe something went wrong with the payment, etc. Please drop an e-mail to support@aerosoft.com and you'll get help.
×
×
  • Create New...