Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 11/26/21 in all areas

  1. Here's some screenshots from last week, with the way it's shaping up and unless a lot of things goes sideways testing should start for full next month.
    19 points
  2. We had our weekly dev meeting and I am happy to share some images that show what our modelers are currently working on. Of course it is hard to relate this to a MSFS product, but at least you know they are creating a lot of lines on a screen. And please accept my assurance it is very very high-end. No prices but if you know what the second and third image show....
    16 points
  3. I do not own any of the Aerosoft P3D aircraft, but I do own many of your sceneries. Regardless, for those that just purchased P3D aircraft (i.e., during the Black Friday sale), might I suggest demanding a refund from Aerosoft or the continuation of support for a reasonable period. First, Aerosoft undoubtedly was aware that P3D v.5.3 was in development and close to release. Second, Aerosoft knowingly advertised their product as compatible with P3D v5 generally -- indeed the website specifically says, even now: Lockheed Martin Prepar3D V4.5.x Hotfix 2 or V5 (the latest version of Prepar3D is always needed) The language clearly indicates that V5, including the latest versions, are supported without exception thereby creating a clear expectation that Aerosoft would continue to support the software for the foreseeable future or until v6 is released. Third, Aerosoft provided no notice of its abandonment of support of products purchased through the website. In other words, Aerosoft has engaged in unfair and deceptive business practices, including false advertising, that are contrary to its own terms and conditions which further incorporate the Ecommerce Europe Trustmark Code of Conduct and the Handlerbund Code of Conduct. Whatever their economic reasons, Aerosoft is not out of business, and it should not, and indeed cannot, avoid accountability for the representations it has made to customers.
    10 points
  4. Hopefully the Aerosoft Twin Otter works better than this one
    9 points
  5. He said sorry ... Took responsibility ... has stated that fix is submitted to MS to be updated as soon as MS will update it.... Like they can not win ... You don't give us updates fast enough ... Now you did the update and something broke ... And you have already sent off the fix but I will never buy anything... I can't imagine you have never made a mistake in your professional life and have delivered perfect every time...
    8 points
  6. Sorry guys. Mea culpa! This one is on me, not on the marketplace. Apparently, I got confused and put one single wrong file into the package which messed everything up. I will provide a new version to the Marketplace people right away. Sorry again. As for VR: The knobs in question have been changed from my own templates to Asobo templates a while ago, so they should work in VR.
    8 points
  7. That’s fine. All my purchases from you have stopped as well. I’m done doing business with you.
    6 points
  8. Your approach is unacceptable. First: I'm not an Aerosoft employee, I'm just a user (with some add. rights in the forum) trying to help others. Second: If you would have read the whole topic, you would have see, that Hans, the dev of the CRJ, accknowledged that he made an error (which can always happen, nobody is perfect) and a fix is on the way to the marketplace. And this kind of acknowlwedgement and reaction I call customer oriented. Additionally: from the moment the fix is at Microsoft, it is out of control of Aerosoft, when it will be available at the marketplace.
    5 points
  9. Why do you think that sales have dropped? Have you had a look at your products? It is with decisions such as these that you chase customers away (who have been loyal for years). Your loss, not ours
    5 points
  10. The flight info seen on the VDGS display is indeed dynamic! The module has an interface where Destination and TOBT can be added, while the flight number is what's assigned in the Aircraft -> Customization menu.
    5 points
  11. I wish that is the real Aerosoft Twin Otter, then this fleet would be complete (Livery Required wink wink)
    5 points
  12. Dispite this sad news, I will still continue to provide the RAD Restrictions and Directs for each AIRAC in the Download area. Best regards David
    5 points
  13. Version 1.0.0

    41 downloads

    Recommend use with AIRAC 2112 for best results. Updates for RAD Restrictions and Directs are cumulative. Changelog Update: Route and Altitude/FL Restrictions Update: RouteCharges (Dec 2021) Update: added Free Route Airspace France for Brest, Bordeaux and Central sectors (LFFF UIR - FL195+) Update: added Free Route Airspace UK (EGPX UIR - FL255+) Update: extended Free Route Airspace Ukraine - Odessa (UKOV UIR - FL275+) Update: AirportInfo xml files for Edinburgh EGPH and Newcastle EGNT Update: adjustments in RAD and Directs to ensure correct routing - e.g.: Lisbon LPPT northbound departures via SID INBOM Warsaw Modlin EPMO west arrivals via STAR DOSIX Oslo Gardemoen ENGM south arrivals via STAR LUNIP Dublin EIDW eastbound departures towards Copenhagen EKDK UIR Paris group arrivals via London EGTT UIR Newcastle EGNT departures/arrivals via NATEB Best regards David
    4 points
  14. Three people on the modeling, three on the systems.
    4 points
  15. Hello neas1982: I understand that you are upset. You bought something, and it doesn't work. I am not sure, how many products I have bought for simulators, that did not work when I downloaded them the first time. I am using another product on another simulator, that has had 9 updates in its first two weeks. I don't want to mention another product, but I have no choice. PMDG's DC-6 release for X-Box and Marketplace is apparently not working, it is a big issue, and it is currently being fixed. I have not had the issues you have, because I generally buy my products directly from the manufacturer/developer. But, in this particular case: 1) Aerosoft, has already acknowledged that they made a mistake. 2) Aerosoft, has already told you that the solution is in the hands of Asobo/Microsoft and they, Aerosoft, don't know when it will be made available to Marketplace users. 3) Aerosoft, has already told you that they will happily (I am sure very happily) return your money. 4) You, have said that you will never, again, buy an Aerosoft product. So, as you will never need it again, why don't you delete this forum from your computer and let the rest of us continue to get the support we need from Aerosoft, without having to continuously read your mean and negative posts that are not helping anybody? Thank you! Roberto
    4 points
  16. The entire point of a HUD is to have the information displayed be fixed relative to the outside world. Most importantly in this case the flight path marker (on military aircraft targeting reticles and markers as well etc). For instance when you are coming in for a landing, you place the flight path marker on the runway itself (also using the attitude ladder to ensure its at the right glide path) and now you know the plane is headed straight for the runway accounting for the winds and everything. If this marker is fixed relative to the hud glass instead of the outside world, this is useless!! Anytime you move your head/viewpoint the marker also moves relative to the outside so you have no clue if the marker is exactly where the plane is going. With an uncollimated HUD there is exactly one head position where the markers are correct and being even a little off means a big error. Without collimation HUDs are almost useless for Track IR and VR users and even people who dont use those have no guarantee the markers are correct. I guess they work as a big PFD but the main benefit of the HUD is gone. After a year Asobo have finally (FINALLY!) given us functional HUDs. And Aerosoft has fixed it accordingly. It works exactly as it needs to. If you need to see all the information move your head/view to the right position. The important thing is that the flight path marker is always giving you correct information no matter which angle you look at it from so long as you can see it. Though not strictly relevant to the sim since we are using 2d displays, a HUD is also focused at "infinity". Meaning a pilot does not need to refocus their eyes to see between the outside world and the HUD information. Its as if the HUD information is displayed at the same distance as the runway or whatever you're looking at so you never lose even a second looking between information and seeing the outside world. This aspect might be relevant for VR users though. Finally as per the attached screenshot (excuse the dreadful approach, was a quick circuit for demonstration purposes), the default head position shows the entire HUD anyway. And if you prefer another position its up to you to ensure you can at least see the flight path marker and the center of the speed and altitude tapes. This is how its supposed to work, its how it works in the real world as well.
    4 points
  17. Stop hijacking threads..... HUD stuff --- Put it in the other 50 threads about the HUD... LVAR animations -- Put it in the other 10 3 threads about that .... (Edit: My Bad... I exaggerated the number.. However getting a PM that if I state the number of threads inaccurately then It validates the user to post about it in this thread...) You don't drive down a one way street the wrong way ... why do people continue to not follow the simple rules of the forum...
    4 points
  18. And we can see that 4 people are sad and have no sense of humor. LOL.
    4 points
  19. Congratulations on the purchase. Now you need to figure out how to hang it upside down from the ceiling.
    4 points
  20. lol been there done that, bought the CRJ on release, got so freaked out about how complex it was based on those videos that I literally only flew it once until a couple of months ago. Now my startup is simbrief, batteries, APU, INS to nav, tablet, FMC, hydraulic pumps , push and start, quick scan of the panels for packs probes etc, go. Cold and dark to taxi in under 10 minutes and it's becoming one of my favourite planes. Some people are right into spending 40 minutes running through checklists setting the plane up (I used to be one of them), I just like to get in the air and fly (in fairness old sims were more about accurate flight and systems models than scenery). I presume the twotter will be similarly complex if you want it to be, or be fine if you just want to grip it and rip it, and it flies slow and low enough that it really encourages you to get in the air as fast as you can to enjoy the view. Can't wait to find out !
    4 points
  21. I don’t really care what you say about PMDG. I just care that you are high jacking this thread. Surely there is a PMDG forum somewhere that you can vent you feelings about them. But not here Please!
    4 points
  22. I will work on the update soon.
    3 points
  23. Quite frequently users complain that Simple Traffic (ST) causes unrealistic low flying aircraft. Aerosoft's answer always was that this is not caused by ST but within MSFS. But also many users didn't believe that and accused Aerosoft of not telling the truth But you can check very easily that Aerosoft is correct, with the following steps: - uninstall ST by simply moving it out of the Community folder - Run MSFS - set AI Traffic to offline - set aircraft density to something above 50 (I set it for testing to 100) - load a flight at an airport, eg. EDDF, EGLL, EHAM or else where with usually lot of traffic - if you have LittlleNavMap installed, run it and let it display AI traffic. - now you will see a lot of traffic and when clicking on any AI aircraft you will see airliners crossing an airport at 500ft, sometimes around 2000ft at 250kts. Quite unrealistic And ST is NOT involved. As not everybody has or wants to install LittleNavMap I made the steps above and made several screenshot in EDDF
    3 points
  24. Well in most case customers like to know what causes an issue. Sure it does not solve it, but I believe it is important that customers understand how an issue that affects them is caused. And as we all know, the patches from Microsoft sometimes cause issues that 3rd party developers have to solve. We are very reactive in these issues compared to others and very open about what is the cause and how we plan to solve it. Clearly that is a style that does not suit you personally and I can understand why that is a reason for you now to buy from us again. Personally I make the same choices about companies who are not open about these things. We all have our own ideas about how a company we buy from behaves. That said, have you actually tried the settings GEK advised? You skipped over that part and it could very well solve your issue!
    3 points
  25. I have been informed that the update should be available soon, please give us a little bit of your patience.
    3 points
  26. Calm down. The AC broke yesturday and the company sais, a fix is already delivered to Microsoft and waits to be available in the sim. What else do you expect? I bought the 900/1000 upgrade yesturday and yes - I am sad it is completely useless right now. But the company is already fixing it, so I apreciate that and fly one of my other 23121 planes for a day or two...
    3 points
  27. This news is an honest statement from Aerosoft, so the direct approach is appreciated. As a bottom line question, perhaps you could charge for updates to defray costs? If you look at the features for 5.3, it is clear that LM is NOT giving up. I can think of at least one scenery developer that charges for any updates when a new point release for Prepar3d includes new features where time must be spent supporting them. With the approach you are taking, it would be a clearer signal to all of us if you would just exit the Prepar3d market entirely as we can't trust that you would remain committed to any platform; your approach is too ephemeral for platforms that remain actively developed. In the case of FSX, I understood as it was truly defunct - but a source of income for many years thereafter. However, not ALL of us will be migrating to MSFS, no matter how it progresses.
    3 points
  28. I second this, I bought the A320 pro in the Black Friday sale - never would have done if I knew it wasn't supported within a fortnight. Is there a refund option in this situation?
    3 points
  29. 3 points
  30. Sorry guys. Mea culpa! This one is on me, not on the marketplace. Apparently, I got confused and put one single wrong file into the package which messed everything up. I will provide a new version to the Marketplace people right away. Sorry again.
    3 points
  31. As a member of this forum, I deserve to know when the next ETA question will be posted!
    3 points
  32. Okay, the ETA for next update is in fact an ATA for last update which happened an hour ago
    3 points
  33. Most of us will but hush, we must not speak of other devs or their addons in this place. 😉
    3 points
  34. I'm picking 17 December for release. Mathijs teased it being not long before Christmas, and 17 December (1903 if you need to google it) is kind of an important date for aviation. More than happy to be proven wrong though, credit card locked and loaded and holding short ... :-)
    3 points
  35. Damn the TwOtter is So beautiful !!!!!!
    3 points
  36. When you are done with the EFB for the time being put it onto the checklist page so you can't accidentally click on the State buttons
    3 points
  37. Hello! I wish someone is working on the Canadian Air Force rescue livery, I would pay for it
    3 points
  38. This update solves a few small issues and adds 77 more airlines: This is the complete new list. Additional airline liveries and Offline AI traffic routes will be added via regular updates Offline AI mode regional coverage is subject to availability of source data * = Currently Online AI mode only Aegean Airlines "Aegean" [AEE] Aer Lingus "Shamrock" [EIN] Aeroflot "Aeroflot" [AFL] AeroLogic "German Cargo" [BOX] AeroMexico "Aeromexico" [AMX] Aeromexico Connect "Costera" [SLI] Air Canada "Air Canada" [ACA] Air Canada (Rouge) "Rouge" [ROU] * Air Canada Express (Jazz) "Jazz" [JZA] Air Canada Express (Maple) "Maple" [SKV] * Air China "Air China" [CCA] Air China Cargo "Airchina Freight" [CAO] Air China Dalian "Xiangjian" [CCD] * Air China Inner Mongolia "Mengyuan" [CMN] * Air France "Airfrans" [AFR] Air France Hop "Air Hop" [HOP] Air Hong Kong (DHL) "Air Hong Kong" [AHK] Air India "Airindia" [AIC] Air India Express "Express India" [AXB] * Air Japan (ANA) "Air Japan" [AJX] * Air Manas (Pegasus) "Air Manas" [MBB] * Air New Zealand "New Zealand" [ANZ] Air Sinai (Egypt Air) "Air Sinai" [ASD] * Air Wisconsin (UAL) "Wisconsin" [AWI] AirAsia Berhad "Red Cap" [AXM] AirAsia India "Red Knight" [IAD] AirAsia X Berhad "Xanadu" [XAX] Alaska Airlines "Alaska" [ASA] Alitalia "Alitalia" [AZA] Alitalia CityLiner "Cityliner" [CYL] * All Nippon Airways "All Nippon" [ANA] Allegiant Air "Allegiant" [AAY] Alliance Air (Air India) "Allied" [LLR] * American Airlines "American" [AAL] ANA Wings "Alpha Wing" [AKX] * Asiana Airlines "Asiana" [AAR] Austrian Airlines "Austrian" [AUA] Azul Brazilian Airlines "Azul Bluebird" [AZU] BA CityFlyer "Flyer" [CFE] * Blue Air "Blue Messenger" [BLA] British Airways "Speedbird" [BAW] British Airways (Shuttle) "Shuttle" [SHT] * Brussels Airlines "Beeline" [BEL] Buzz (Ryanair) "Magic Sun" [RYS] * Cathay Pacific "Cathay" [CPA] China Airlines "Dynasty" [CAL] China Eastern Airlines "China Eastern" [CES] * China Southern Airlines "China Southern" [CSN] CommutAir (UAL) "Commutair" [UCA] Delta Air Lines "Delta" [DAL] DHL Aero Expreso "Yellow" [DAE] DHL Air UK "World Express" [DHK] DHL International Aviation ME "Dilmun" [DHX] easyJet Europe "Alpine" [EJU] * easyJet Switzerland "Topswiss" [EZS] easyJet UK "Easy" [EZY] Egypt Air "Egyptair" [MSR] Emirates "Emirates" [UAE] Endeavor Air (DAL) "Endeavor" [EDV] Envoy Air (AAL) "Envoy" [ENY] Ethiopian Airlines "Ethiopian" [ETH] Etihad Airways "Etihad" [ETD] European Air Transport (DHL) "Eurotrans" [BCS] Eurowings "Eurowings" [EWG] Eurowings Europe "Europwings" [EWE] * FedEx "Fedex" [FDX] Finnair "Finnair" [FIN] Frontier "Frontier Flight" [FFT] GoJet Airlines (UAL) "Lindbergh" [GJS] Gol Transportes Aereos "Gol" [GLO] Grand China Air "Grand China" [GDC] * Hainan Airlines "Hainan" [CHH] Hawaiian Airlines "Hawaiian" [HAL] Helvetic Airways "Helvetic" [OAW] * Horizon Air (ASA) "Horizon Air" [QXE] Iberia "Iberia" [IBE] Iberia Express "Iberexpres" [IBS] * Iberia Regional "Air Nostrum" [ANE] IndiGo "I Fly" [IGO] Indonesia AirAsia "Wagon Air" [AWQ] Iran Air "Iranair" [IRA] * ITA Airways "Itarrow" [ITY] * İzmir Airlines (Pegasus) "Izmir" [IZM] * J-Air "Japan Air" [JLJ] Japan Airlines "Japanair" [JAL] Japan Transocean Air "Jai Ocean" [JTA] JetBlue "Jetblue" [JBU] Jetstar "Jetstar" [JST] Jetstar Asia "Jetstar Asia" [JSA] * Jetstar Japan "Orange Liner" [JJP] * Juneyao Airlines "Air Juneyao" [DKH] KLM "Klm" [KLM] KLM Cityhopper "City" [KLC] Korean Air "Korean Air" [KAL] Kunming Airlines "Kunming Air" [KNA] Kuwait Airways "Kuwaiti" [KAC] LATAM "LAN Chile" [LAN] * LATAM Brasil "Tam" [TAM] LATAM Cargo Brasil "Tamcargo" [LTG] * LATAM Cargo Chile "Lan Cargo" [LCO] LATAM Cargo Colombia "Lanco" [LAE] * LATAM Colombia "Lan Colombia" [ARE] * LATAM Equador "Lan Equador" [LNE] * LATAM Express "Lanex" [LXP] * LATAM Paraguay "Paraguaya" [LAP] * LATAM Perú "Lan Peru" [LPE] * Lion Air "Lion Inter" [LNI] * LOT Charters "Central Wings" [CLW] * LOT Polish Airlines "Pollot" [LOT] Lufthansa "Lufthansa" [DLH] Lufthansa Cargo "Lufthansa Cargo" [GEC] Lufthansa CityLine "Hansaline" [CLH] Malindo Air "Malindo" [MXD] * Malta Air (Ryanair) "Blue Med" [MAY] * Mesa Airlines (AAL) "Air Shuttle" [ASH] Mesa Airlines (UAL) "Air Shuttle" [ASH] Nordic Regional Airlines "Fincomm" [WBA] * Nordic Regional Airlines (Finnair) "Finnair" [FCM] * Norwegian Air International "Nortrans" [IBK] * Norwegian Air Norway "Norship" [NAN] * Norwegian Air Shuttle "Nor Shuttle" [NAX] Norwegian Air Sweden "Nordic" [NSW] * Pegasus Airlines "Sunturk" [PGT] Philippines AirAsia "Cool Red" [APG] Piedmont Airlines (AAL) "Piedmont" [PDT] PSA Airlines (AAL) "Blue Streak" [JIA] Qantas "Qantas" [QFA] QantasLink "Q Link" [QLK] QantasLink (Net-Link) "Net Link" [NWK] * QantasLink (Q-Jet) "Q Jet" [QJE] * Qatar Airways "Qatari" [QTR] Qatar Amiri Flight "Amiri" [QAF] * Republic Airlines (AAL) "Brickyard" [RPA] Republic Airlines (DAL) "Brickyard" [RPA] Republic Airlines (UAL) "Brickyard" [RPA] Ryanair "Ryanair" [RYR] Ryanair UK "Bluemax" [RUK] * S7 Airlines "Siberia Airlines" [SBI] SAS "Scandinavian" [SAS] Saudia "Saudia" [SVA] Scandinavian Airlines Ireland "Spinnaker" [SZS] * Shandong Airlines "Shandong" [CDG] Shenzhen Airlines "Shenzhen Air" [CSZ] Sichuan Airlines "Chuanhang" [CSC] Singapore Airlines "Singapore" [SIA] SkyWest Airlines (AAL) "Skywest" [SKW] SkyWest Airlines (ASA) "Skywest" [SKW] SkyWest Airlines (DAL) "Skywest" [SKW] SkyWest Airlines (UAL) "Skywest" [SKW] Southwest Airlines "Southwest" [SWA] SpiceJet "Spicejet" [SEJ] Spirit "Spirit Wings" [NKS] Spring Airlines "Air Spring" [CQH] Suparna Airlines "Yangtze River" [YZR] * Swiss International Air Lines "Swiss" [SWR] TAP Air Portugal "Air Portugal" [TAP] TAP Express "Air Portugal" [PGA] Tarom "Tarom" [ROT] Thai AirAsia X "Express Wing" [TAX] Thai Airways International "Thai" [THA] Thai Lion "Mentari" [TLM] * Transavia "Transavia" [TRA] Transavia France "France Soleil" [TVF] TUI Airways "Tomjet" [TOM] TUI fly Belgium "Beauty" [JAF] TUI fly Deutschland "Tui Jet" [TUI] TUI fly Netherlands "Orange" [TFL] TUI fly Nordic "Bluescan" [BLX] * Turkish Airlines "Turkish" [THY] Ukraine International "Ukraine International" [AUI] United Airlines "United" [UAL] UPS Airlines "U P S" [UPS] Ural "Sverdlovsk Air" [SVR] Valuair (Jetstar) "Valuair" [VLU] * Virgin Atlantic "Virgin" [VIR] Virgin Australia "Velocity" [VOZ] VivaAerobus "Aeroenlaces" [VIV] Volaris "Volaris" [VOI] Volaris Costa Rica "Costa Rican" [VOC] * Volaris El Salvador "Jetsal" [VOS] * Vueling "Vueling" [VLG] WestJet "Westjet" [WJA] Wizz Air "Wizz" [WZZ] Wizz Air Abu Dhabi "Wizz Sky" [WAZ] * Wizz Air UK "Wizz Go" [WUK] *
    3 points
  39. No worries, I spend a lot of time round the PMDG forum and I know from a recent interview they are trying to pull out all the stops for MSFS, I think the xbox issue is just an unfortunate teething issue and as you say they'll have it fixed ASAP
    3 points
  40. I'd suggest you go to the PMDG forums and look before making any comments like this against a top developer with 25 years because it's a well known issue affect 10% of users that PMDG nor MS know what's causing it or had the issues whilst testing
    3 points
  41. PMDG is a very reliable company and I'm sure they did proper testing. So before you start complaining abou them, you should maybe read this: https://forum.pmdg.com/forum/main-forum/pmdg-dc-6-cloudmaster-forum/153473-24nov21-xbox-users-important-update-and-trouble-shooting-process And this ends the discussion about products from our friends at PMDG.
    3 points
  42. In a few weeks we can really start to show stuff. At this moment it is all rather bare.
    3 points
  43. That is like saying MS should not publish an SDK/API documentation as it is possible to cause issues if you don't know the internal programing.... PMDG publishes the events, the Vars and provides the documentation.... MSFS publishes the docs as well. With a little bit of work on the MSFS SDK one can also put in an ADD ON that will allow you to scrape and pull all of the LVARs that the CRJ loads in with.... Considering you can not turn on switches properly without the L:VARs saying that users should only have access on a case by case basis is a bad policy.... Proper documentation should be supplied listing all of the L:Vars and Sim events
    3 points
  44. Yes you can, but you'll need to edit the add-on aircraft's config file manually. Each aircraft add-on has an aircraft.cfg file, normally to be found in a sub-folder within the add-on package: [...]\SimObjects\AirPlanes\[...]. If you locate and edit that file, you will find it contains a config parameter: IsAirTraffic=0. If you change that parameter to IsAirTraffic=1, then that model will be eligible for selection as Ground Traffic even if Generic mode is on. It will also be eligible for selection as airborne AI traffic, but only for real-time AI flights with a matching ICAO aircraft type code. Make sure to take a backup first though!
    2 points
  45. Nope. In fact we might be looking at some delay. Hope to know more soon but things are a bit fuzzy right now.
    2 points
  46. 2 points
  47. Well the first issue is that what you say above is absolutely NOT the way to correct for the issue you see. 1. You cannot leave the CRJ alone at cruise. EVER. The wind will shift or a pressure differential occur. You are in danger of losing altitude in either of these. When that happens the autopilot will, as you know, try to fix the problem. It can't. You can't. The aircraft does NOT have enough power at cruise to overcome this problem. If you cannot climb and maintain yourself on the correct side of the power curve, you will lose that battle and the CRJ will try to kill you and your pretend passengers. The ONLY corrective action is to trade altitude for speed immediately. Trading altitude for speed is ALWAYS an option, until it is not. Typically, it stops being an option because the pilot did the wrong thing. You should: 1. Disconnect the a/p 2. Nose over to begin gaining speed 3. Reset ALT for a lower altitude. You may need a few thousand feet depending on how quickly you were able to react to the problem. 4. Once you are in a controlled descent with speed on the right side of the curve, THEN you can re-engage the a/p. You may need to cycle off with the bar. Fortunately, I fly very few "long" flights in the CRJ and I don't have to spend a lot of time at cruise babysitting her. However, I cruise at about 15 knots below the barber pole, typically around M0.80ish. That gives me some wiggle room to hit the head if needed.
    2 points
  48. I was watching someone's flight of an XP11 Twotter to get some idea of what it takes to start one in a sim, and... well, it's not very much, so I don't think that'll be a problem. It's not like the 20s of an Islander, but well, it's a *bit* more complicated 😛 Is it coming with the paintkit?
    2 points
×
×
  • Create New...