Root Admin Mathijs Kok Posted March 15 Author Root Admin Share Posted March 15 4 hours ago, Flying_Timm said: Did you ask when their EFB will actually come? (or UFT) Actually, indeed I did! As you may know, there is a very open flow of information between PMDG and 'my' teams. Very few secrets and a lot of trust. We know they have issues there and we have told them we would be happy to offer any assistance. I would be happy to send them the complete code of the A330 EFB if it would help them. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Root Admin Mathijs Kok Posted March 15 Author Root Admin Share Posted March 15 2 hours ago, BlackLiverieZ said: I think the majority of people here are interested in the function of the A330 and not whether the paint job was done with the right font. I agree, but until I got something to sell I will settle for something to talk about, lol. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Root Admin Mathijs Kok Posted March 15 Author Root Admin Share Posted March 15 4 hours ago, Patrick Helzer said: Thats what I was thinking. But I think no one would complain if these two thin grey stripes would be removed. Without these I would have thought this being a real photo. Okay, solid comment, will be looked at. You know, one reason I share screenshots is to get these comments! For example, somebody noticed in screenshots that a complete bitmap was missing from the gear doors. Now believe me when I say we have a very solid beta test team and a Quality Control team (not the same). But this is stuff that can be missed. Now solved. Please login to display this image. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ftanyous17 Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 Hello! I'm not sure if this question was already addressed but will the performance of the A330 be similar to the CRJ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Airlow Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 hello Mathijs I had a question the test phase is going well? you have solved all the problems or there are still a lot to solve you still need someone to help you? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Root Admin Mathijs Kok Posted March 15 Author Root Admin Share Posted March 15 45 minutes ago, Mathijs Kok said: Thanks, will be looked at. And it is solved. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramp_air Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 1 minute ago, Mathijs Kok said: Et c'est résolu. it was super fast 🤩 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Md Alavi Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 Would love see some screenshots with Singapore Airlines livery! 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cabr6n Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 34 minutes ago, Ftanyous17 said: Hello! I'm not sure if this question was already addressed but will the performance of the A330 be similar to the CRJ? i hope thats the case too 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Root Admin Mathijs Kok Posted March 15 Author Root Admin Share Posted March 15 29 minutes ago, Ftanyous17 said: Hello! I'm not sure if this question was already addressed but will the performance of the A330 be similar to the CRJ? It has been discussed so do a search. It is a bit difficult to reply in detail right now because we are testing major parts outside the sim (we have an MSFS simulator simulator), but we are hopeful. A major part of what drags down FPS is modeling/texturing and I know we are state-of-the-art on that. Apart from Carenado, I think we are the only dev team who considers Xbox and Cloud at every point in the development. And no, that does not 'drag down' the PC version, just look at the screenshots. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Root Admin Popular Post Mathijs Kok Posted March 15 Author Root Admin Popular Post Share Posted March 15 23 hours ago, Ярослав Подъяпольский said: Great screenshots, but what are those thin gray stripes on the wing? Well, your posts did cause some discussions on our internal channels. The simple fact is that most people do not really understand how an aircraft is bolted together. The line you see is not a line of rivets, it is the gap between the fuselage sections. That gap is there to remove areas of stress (check the story of the Comet, which did not have these gaps). Now on almost all MSFS aircraft, you can buy this is a 'line'. We modeled it in 3D, so it has shading. That was based on our own research of the aircraft (we never do an aircraft without having access). Please login to display this image. Here you have one of the thousands of photographs our team made. You will see it is not a line but a gap. 18 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramp_air Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 31 minutes ago, Mathijs Kok said: It has been discussed so do a search. It is a bit difficult to reply in detail right now because we are testing major parts outside the sim (we have an MSFS simulator simulator), but we are hopeful. A major part of what drags down FPS is modeling/texturing and I know we are state-of-the-art on that. Apart from Carenado, I think we are the only dev team who considers Xbox and Cloud at every point in the development. And no, that does not 'drag down' the PC version, just look at the screenshots. I have a question do you have a lot of testers who manage the pc and the xbox or is it really mixed up? Thanks 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black2306 Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 On 3/11/2023 at 9:28 PM, Mathijs Kok said: a bit delayed as we got some thrust fluctuations (or rather slow stabilization) Mathijs, do you have the progress in this problem? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimJB Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 How satisfied are you with the sharpness, color and fonts of the cockpit displays? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anndrew Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 Will the aircraft have custom VNAV/LNAV and can it support all kinds of approaches? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ярослав Подъяпольский Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 16 hours ago, Mathijs Kok said: Well, your posts did cause some discussions on our internal channels. The simple fact is that most people do not really understand how an aircraft is bolted together. The line you see is not a line of rivets, it is the gap between the fuselage sections. That gap is there to remove areas of stress (check the story of the Comet, which did not have these gaps). Now on almost all MSFS aircraft, you can buy this is a 'line'. We modeled it in 3D, so it has shading. That was based on our own research of the aircraft (we never do an aircraft without having access). Please login to display this image. Here you have one of the thousands of photographs our team made. You will see it is not a line but a gap. I was not talking about this line on the fuselage, but about these lines on the wing. Is it spars or what? Please login to display this image. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Root Admin Mathijs Kok Posted March 16 Author Root Admin Share Posted March 16 11 hours ago, anndrew said: Will the aircraft have custom VNAV/LNAV and can it support all kinds of approaches? Of course. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P Astarto Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Hi, It's a very good news when i hear this A330 from Aerosoft is coming close to release Will the Abnormal Procedures present on this A330? And how will the aircraft (systemwise) be in the MSFS version? sorry if this has been asked before Thanks 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Root Admin Mathijs Kok Posted March 16 Author Root Admin Share Posted March 16 We only cover Standard Operations is all our aircraft. Systems wise it has all you need to do standard operations. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryBRZz Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 1 minute ago, Mathijs Kok said: We only cover Standard Operations is all our aircraft. Systems wise it has all you need to do standard operations. So there will be no fuel dumping? only standard stuff? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryBRZz Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 On 3/15/2023 at 2:01 PM, Patrick Helzer said: Thats what I was thinking. But I think no one would complain if these two thin grey stripes would be removed. Without these I would have thought this being a real photo. not a huge deal anyway. I'm sure they will make a reasonable decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P Astarto Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 6 minutes ago, Mathijs Kok said: We only cover Standard Operations is all our aircraft. Systems wise it has all you need to do standard operations. Thats Cool, there's only maybe 1-5% Users who practically use The Abnormal procedures anyway, even the Fenix one i only use the failures maybe bellow 10 flights cant wait to see or hear more updates for this Beauty Thx 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackLiverieZ Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 vor 4 Stunden schrieb Ярослав Подъяпольский: I was not talking about this line on the fuselage, but about these lines on the wing. Is it spars or what? Please login to display this image. I think these are simply lines from the paint job and not from the model itself. I wouldn't worry about that either Nothing that you can not do with a livery from a user. I think the focus is simply on the function and the model of the plane. What I personally also find much more important. Better an "okay" livery and a great plane instead of a "great" livery and a bad plane. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Secondator Posted March 16 Aerosoft Share Posted March 16 34 minutes ago, HarryBRZz said: So there will be no fuel dumping? only standard stuff? Fuel dumping is anyways an extra option of the airline to choose from. Some A330s have it, some don't. Ours don't. And I also believe that the version where this option is not available is more common in general as well. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pavel1971 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 22 minutes ago, Secondator said: Fuel dumping is anyways an extra option of the airline to choose from. Some A330s have it, some don't. Ours don't. And I also believe that the version where this option is not available is more common in general as well. My question is more about the actual use of the A330 than the model. Isn't fuel dumping a mandatory option in aircraft design? After all, fuel collection is used in case of failures, when a forced landing is provided and there is a need to dump fuel. In this case, the desire of the airline goes by the wayside The second part of the question. If there is an A330 in which fuel dumping is not provided, what were the designers guided by when lining up the aircraft without fuel dumping, namely reliability, etc.? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now