Jump to content

BernhardS

Members
  • Content Count

    238
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

19 Good

About BernhardS

  • Rank
    Flight Student - Crosscountry

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Ok.......das mit dem Drohnenmodus klappt auch als Ersatz für die Schnellverstellung. Die Bewegungs- und Rotationsgeschwindigkeit kann man sich ja auch anpassen, so dass man sich schneller als voreingestellt bewegt. Wenn man die entsprechenden Translationsbefehle auf die Zehnertastatur legt, hat man dann die analogen Bewegungsmöglichkeiten zum klassischen Slew des P3D.
  2. Danke für die Antwort. Ist natürlich nicht nur in Paderborn so, aber hat eben gut zu dieser Szenerie gepasst, da man sich leider nicht alles an diesem schönen Flughafen anschauen kann. Hoffen wir mal, dass Asobo hier etwas ändert. Ich denke, dass auch Aerosoft als gewichtiger Partner von Microsoft/Asobo daran interessiert ist, dass die Schnellverstellung korrigiert wird. Schon allein, um die eigenen Szenerien besser überprüfen zu können.
  3. Hallo Aerosoft-Team, zunächst einmal vielen Dank für die kostenlose Bereitstellung des Paderborner Flughafens. Die Szenerie ist wirklich beeindruckend gelungen und fügt sich nahtlos in den neuen MFS ein. Sowohl Untergrund als auch die Modelle machen einen professionellen Eindruck und machen Lust auf weitere Flughäfen in der MFS-Welt. Leider trübt eine Kleinigkeit das ganze: ich schaue mir die Flughäfen bisher immer auch mit der Schnellverstellung/Slew an, die in P3D einwandfrei funktioniert. Im neuen MFS gibt es diese zwar auch, aber eine Verstellung mit den Pfeiltasten ergib
  4. Pelle, this is great!!! Thank you very much! By the way: your program is really phantastic. I use it very often during installation of new flightplans and for comparing AI flights in the sim with the plans from AIG. Bernhard
  5. Pelle, best thing would be if one could change the width of the 3 list views individually. So you could resize especially the width of the Airlines/Aircraft list by yourself coz it's not so important (for me) to see the whole width. There are only a few aircraft with long names and those are more or less unimportant (Aero Commander and Cessnas). Bernhard
  6. Thank you Pelle.........that's it! I use a font size of 125% and coz of that the window is wider than 1920 px. My eyes are a bit older so it's impossible for me to use a font size of 100%. But I have a 2 Monitor setup so at the moment I can see the right part of the search window on the second monitor. Although the solution of ver1.15 was more practicle for me. But I think that's the effect of the additional search criteria in ver1.16. But if you reduce the window size of the left 3 list views that would be a perfect solution for me !!! Thanks very much. Bernhard
  7. Hallo, thanks for the new version 1.16 of FV. It works perfect but one thing is annoying: I have a resolution of 1920x1200 but the search legs window seems too wide. So I cannot see the whole window. When I reduce it, the right part of the window disappears so I cannot see the buttons on the right side, like "reset" "search" and so on. In version 1.15 it was ok but now........??!!!! Where is the solution? Bernhard
  8. I don't think that Christoph Rieger still develops sceneries for flightsim. Buy the one that is availible for P3D - it's very good. Bernhard
  9. I have the same opinion as "kannwar". The human eye in reallife has great abilities to compensate "faults" in windows, as tint or dust. After some time human eyes doesn't see those things, they blend them out. But the monitor doesn't have such ablities, so excessive tint is always a problem and it doesn't makes simflying more real, but it makes it more unpleasent. A bad example is the Do27 of Marcel Felde. The windows are so much tinted (maybe coz of the aging of the plastic material of the windows), that it is (for me) very unpleasent to fly the plane. So I changed the texture to delete thos
  10. Thorsten, the photoscenery of VFRFrance design group for the western part of the côte d'azur is now availible. It's called PACA Vol. 2 and includes the scenery around the city of Marseille and its airport. It looks very good and is made with 1m resolution. But they defined the airport altitude to 9.85 feet with their mesh and their AFCAD. And this is against the altitude of MS-standard altitude of LFML which is 74 feet. But 9.85 feet seems to be the real-world altitude of LFML! So I hope, that SimWings will now finish their MarseilleFSX . Bernhard
  11. Also ich will mal kurz ein paar Hinweise geben: VFR Germany hat natürlich keine Nachttexturen und nur Sommertexturen. Für mich jedoch kein Nachteil, denn 1. finde ich im Winter fliegen (mit fast weissen Texturen) öde und langweilig, brauche ich zudem Frühling und Sommertexturen nicht (warum denn??) und 2. fliege ich nur tags. Sollte ich unbedingt nachts fliegen, dann schalte ich eben VFR Germany aus und hab die Standard MS-Nachtexturen, nachts sind eh alle Katzen grau und von der Foto-Szenerie sieht man nachts nix. VFR Germany hat ehrlich gesagt schlechtere fps als MS-Standard. Normalerw
  12. Ich hab den AccPack und hab das gleiche Probem mit den ILS-Frequenzen. Somit scheints wohl an dem Unterschied SP2-AccPack zu liegen? Bernhard
  13. Thorsten, release dates are not announced yet. They showed lots of preview-shots of PACA 1 which covers the eastern parts of the Côte d'Azur. The western part (PACA 2), which will include Marseille is also shown in first pictures. Maybe it takes about 3 months, til it is finished. But that's my pure guess. The problem with the first version was, that your Marseille airport was made for the standard FS-altitude of Marseille, which MS defines in a wrong way too high. The photo scenery of VFRFrance layed Marseille in the real altitude, so your AFCAD and FVRFrance-mesh were not real compatibl
  14. Thorsten, please remember, that there is a french Designergroup called VFRFrance, which makes photosceneries of France. At the moment they are realising PACA (Provence, Cote d'azur) in 1m resolution. The first previews look phantastic, so please make your new Marseille FSX airport compatible to that product. Unfortunatly the last versions in FS9 were not compatible to each other. Bernhard
  15. I thought in the same way and hesitated to buy EHAM for FSX for a long time. But in the end I buyed it and was very surprised, that the frames are not lower than other european mega-airports (like Heathrow or Paris CDG or Munich). But I have to admit that i use EHAM with the NL2000 freeware of Netherlald. And that is photo-texture with very few autogen. But that doesn't matter, coz texture resolution is so good that you don't need autogen really. Bernhard
×
×
  • Create New...