Hallo Hermann, auf die Qualität deiner Videos in Bezug auf Information und der professionellen Abarbeitung deines Fluges möchte ich nichts mehr sagen, da ich mich nur wiederholen würde.   Dankbar bin ich für alle Infos um deine Flüge, wie zB. die Erklärung der Karte.   In deinem Flug besonders erklärt die Zone der Fallschirmspringer oder die RMZ.   Das du Pilot bist, zeigst du in deinen Videos und gibst dein Wissen frei weiter.   Dies ist für mich Grund, deine Videos zu schauen, denn ich nehme immer etwas mit   Ich lerne vieles was du vermittelst eh nicht mehr, da mir die Grundausbildung fehlt.   Was ich aber mitnehme, sind die Informationen, egal welcher Art.   Ob es das Anlassen eines Fliegers ist, den ich nicht kenne ( die Beaver habe ich durch dich gelernt) oder einen Flug, den ich nachfliegen möchte, es inspiriert!   Die Wahl deiner jetzigen Scenery hat mich bewogen, einige von Huey Pilot in meinen Scenery Ordner aufzunehmen.   Die Qualität um Koblenz kommt der von ORBX sehr nahe. Und das als Freeware.   Danke und Gruß   Micha

Will Aerosoft be bringing out a compatible version of AFC_Bridge for Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024 ?

Hello everyone, after seeing the trailer i saw some errors in the scenery. Before diving down into them i would like to give some background about me. I live near Malpensa and i photograph at that airport since 2009 so i saw the evolution of the airport in all those years plus, i have the opportunity to be able to organize airside spotting sessions thanks to SEA (Malpensa airport authority) so i have a first hand point of view. After seeing the trailer i felt that there might were some errors and after a closer look here's what i found. Firstly i want to start with the parking positions present in the scenery. Malpensa is divided in three macro areas: Terminal 2 only used by EasyJet Terminal 1 Sub divided in SAT A (only Schengen) Sat B and Sat C (Only Extra Schengen) Cargo city 1 and cargo city 2 Attached you can find the three macro areas directly provided by the free online consulting tool provided by ENAV Italy By looking at the video i saw that there were so many wrong airplanes parked in the following area From stand 300 to stand 320 (which are used primarily by private jets and, rarely by private A320 or 738)  Stand 351 to 357 are used only by single aisle aircrafts stand 391 to 394 are used only by wide body aircrafts stand 330-331-332-333 are used only by private single aisle (they are the closest to SEA Prime facility) stand 335-336 are a long term parking for the Lufthansa maintenance facility stand 334 is a mixed use stand for both medium and wide body aircraft same as the two above this one Regarding Sat C Stand 495 is reserved only for A380 (there was a Cathay 77W parked there) Speaking of Sat C it's missing a whole bridge section that goes from the upper floor to the finger attachment point for stand 499 and 495. On top of that Satellite there's the Emirates business lounge which have the peculiarity to have two boarding point reserved only for business and first passenger and it's connected directly to the upper level of the A380 via a separate bridge and finger. In this scenery those bridges are missing completely.   Moving on All the parking from 451 to 764 (Remote areas in front of Terminal 1 and Cargo city 1) are exclusive use of aircraft up to Cat C (A32x or 737) 621 to 625 can be used up to CAT D but primarily are used by 737 or 320 (CAT C) Other that those issues pointed above regarding the parking spots, i saw that the Calvert lights are placed at the end of the displaced threshold of Runway 35L which is incorrect in real life, they stop at 135m before the displaced threshold. Regarding the scenery, apart from the low resolution texture (but it might be a limitation from the trailer) i saw that there were some bus (Malpensa Shuttle Bus) airside at Terminal 2 and one at Terminal 1 under the tower Those bus are used only to connect Malpensa with other airports like Linate, Bergamo or Turin. The railings on the access road to the terminal is missing and there were some cargo ULD stationed on taxiway Kilo in front of Cargo city 1 (they should be in between the painted road which is the limit for the stand area) Lastly the control tower doesn't have anymore the "flat" radar dome but it was changed in november 2021 with a new rounded one (i can provide some photos of it) About all the landside details i'm not that preoccupied because we will use the airport, obviously, in the airside area but... as i pointed out, it seems like that it was used as a template the parking layout in operation until 2014 more or less. I hope this message will not be seen as an open attack but as an open critique to try and take this scenery in line with what Malpensa is right now. Thanks for your patience. Kind Regards Lorenzo  

Please login to display this image.

Please login to display this image.

Please login to display this image.

Please login to display this image.

AERODROME PARKING DOCKING CHART _T2 - ICAO.pdf AIRCRAFT PARKING DOCKING CHART _T1 SOUTH - ICAO.pdf AIRCRAFT PARKING DOCKING CHART _T1 NORTH - ICAO.pdf

thanks Simware and Ben .... I'll wait patiently 

I did.  Which is how I know $9 was paid for shipping but I was charged $45 for shipping.  Just spoke to the post office here.  Won’t have my LCE until at least Monday, so yay!  I get it in December like a European, but without any codes.  Thanks a lot for screwing up the shipping to take more of my money.  

Thanks Ben !

Just to chime in regarding the situation with MSFS2024 and the current Honeycomb software for the Bravo lights not working in some planes like the Cessna Skyhawk: we check some electrical variables to determine if the LEDs should light up at all, and while in MSFS2020 this works fine, in 2024 those variables are simply 0 the whole time, regardless of the state of the electrical busses. So we had to alter the included default Bravo profile accordingly, to identify and bypass those variables.   Like Cedric indicated above, it should not be too long before this becomes available to y'all.

The current Honeycomb software isn't compatible with MSFS2024 yet. A new version is currently being developped and will be available within 7-10 days.

Hello, im also having issues with "Missing UserCfg.opt" when installing AS_HONEYCOMB_MSFS_V2100  onto my a newly installed windows-11-home with flight-simulator-2024. This pc had nothing else and has no customization. As recommended, I also tried AS_HONEYCOMB_MSFS_V2200 without success.   Im new to windows and flight-sim (but good at linux). i'm unsure  what steps I missed, how to debug this issue,  or how to contact support.   Any suggestions will be appreciated.   The error message: Missing UserCfg.opt C:\Users\X\AppData\Packages\Microsoft.FlightSimulator_8wekyb3d8bbwe\localCache C:\Users\X\AppData\Roaming\\Microsoft Flight Simulator

Soooo... anyone from Aerosoft feel like replying to us?    Would be great to be able to use the sceneries if they are indeed available and ok to use... Realise it is early days of FS2024 but for reference Simmarket.com app, Contrail app, Ini builds manager and Orbx manager all have options for installing scenery into MSFS2024... Far from all sceneries marked as compatible but still...    Best, Daniel