cconesa 0 Posted December 28, 2019 I've just downloaded v2.02 and the ZFW numbers between the EFB and the FMC are off by some 1.2T. No matter how many times I transfer the numbers from the EFB to the FMC, the number still differs (I was using ZFW 33.2T on the EFB but the FMC was showing a ZFW of just over 32T). This is happening on the 1000 version. Haven't tested the 900. Please advise. Regards, Christian Conesa. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cconesa 0 Posted December 28, 2019 Check the screen capture Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
metzgergva 40 Posted December 29, 2019 Confirmed! Sorry will be updated. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cconesa 0 Posted January 14 Hello, This seems to be still outstanding. Any proposed dates for the update and correction?. Regards, Christian Conesa. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hans Hartmann 2159 Posted January 15 No, sorry. The fix will be part of a bigger package. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cconesa 0 Posted January 21 Meantime, which are the correct readings?: EFB or FMC? Christian Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
metzgergva 40 Posted January 21 EFB should be very similar (just rounding errors) to the data in P3D. So best to plan with those figures and EFB gives the correct speeds. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
