!! Windows 7 no longer supported !!

As Microsoft will stop supporting Windows 7 on Jan 20th we will be unable to test any of our
products on that platform. It may work, or it may not, but no guarantees from our side. 

Jump to content

Paul Golding

Testers CRJ
  • Content Count

    903
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Paul Golding last won the day on January 13 2011

Paul Golding had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

144 Excellent

About Paul Golding

  • Rank
    Privat Pilot - SEP

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Lovely looking product and all that Hans, but, shouldn't there be another engine at the back? The flight deck looks all wrong too; missing fire handles on the glareshield; only 2 throttles, lots of glass screens instead of nice round dials with needles in them😉
  2. OK, I could read it that way as well and come up with 3 weeks too. Even so, for users to be upset about the lack of a release 3 weeks after a product is announced to be in beta, still seems unreasonable to me. However, Tizi's comment in the announcement post about "release should be next week" was probably not the best thing to post
  3. Not sure about how you count, but to me at least (on Feb 16th), we're only 8 days after the final pic's before release post was made..........i.e. 1 week not 3 weeks. And, since then, Aerosoft have more than once stated that there's a slight delay whilst testing the installer. I really can't see how anyone could be disappointed
  4. Makes sense to me ddeuce, I was just pointing out that the first two photos I found were in fact not painted on both sides and here's another googled using the N400DF http://www.aerialvisuals.ca/Photo.php?5318 The only thing I found painted as you'd expect was a Tracker http://www.aerialvisuals.ca/Photo.php?5312 Either way, great looking re-paint!
  5. Maybe not all of them are painted black on the intside too? http://farm2.staticf...197c5ce65_s.jpg http://www.google.co...Otsq2NDw&zoom=1
  6. The beta forum is only visible to members of the beta team.
  7. This has been raised in the beta forum now. It's nothing to do with your OS.
  8. I don't think it would take more than a few minutes of reading to find out that this Aerosoft Airbus is not in the same league as the PMDG NGX, in either complexity, accuracy or price.........though there's probably a good argument to say it's as good in the visuals department. Also, a couple of minutes in the forum would have made you aware of the fact that a more complex version is on the way.
  9. To be fair, I didn't read Bjørn's post as a complaint, merely a first impression, so your reply could be read as a being a bit over the top. In fact given the few issues mentioned compared to what some have said, I read the post like a glowing review.
  10. I'm also using the X-52 with default sensitivities and no problems.
  11. No there isn't. It would detract from the model's performance which is optimized to give outstanding frame rates.
  12. British Blenheims with Hawker Hurricanes (and maybe something else?) Bugger! I think I meant FW190 too :-)
  13. Sorry, I don't understand your question or how it relates to the point you made about the MSFS beta testing.
  14. Like Mathijs already said, MS used to fix some bugs and leave others. I've had the same experience with all beta versions from FS2000. At the end of the day, they're aming for a release schedule and accept that some bugs will remain, which of course is true of even Aerosoft products. You simply can't sit on a product until every single issue is resolved. As for the people they've used, you can be fairly sure that almost all commercial developers for FS have been active on the beta's.
×
×
  • Create New...