Jump to content

srcooke

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3501

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    8

srcooke last won the day on October 18 2024

srcooke had the most liked content!

6 Followers

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

srcooke's Achievements

Rising Star

Rising Star (9/14)

  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • Dedicated Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare

Recent Badges

439

Reputation

  1. srcooke
    It is, dev has been contacted.
  2. srcooke
    I can confirm server connection is lost, I'll contact FlightsimSoft after landing should the issue not have resolved.
  3. srcooke started following PFPX v2.03 - hanging when Validating Plan , No Pacific or Australian Tracks in PFPX and Can't activate PFPX and TOPCAT
  4. srcooke
    Hello Torben, I'm not sure if the PACOTS format changed or the available source link moved, I did let the dev know but this hasn't been resolved. AUSOTS ceased back the begining of the pandemic as I recall and removed from the Off Air Route Planning manual in June 2023 ,now replaced by User Preferred Routes. See Off air route flight planning options
  5. srcooke
    There has been a relatively recent server change Vladimir which appears a little temperamental at times.
  6. srcooke
    Right but at the time remote Eurocontrol access for CFMU validation was permitted. The function was removed WHEN requested. Whilst v2.03 of PFPX will automatically attempt to connect it will fail as the link is no longer valid, this function was removed in v2.04.
  7. srcooke
    The vaidation should not be used Ray, remote validation by other than approved sources was disabled at the request of Eurocontrol a number of years back. v2.04 disables the automatic validation but my preference is to remain on v2.03. There was a server issue yesterday that may have affected PFPX use, resolved yesterday evening.
  8. srcooke
    The exclamation exists due to the TAFS not updating.
  9. srcooke
    I had noticed and an email now sent to the dev.
  10. srcooke started following B789 ETOPS question in PFPX and PFPX Server subscription | Winds aloft *not updating*
  11. srcooke
    Thanks for the Update Jo.
  12. srcooke
    @scalan , @E Talley , @raptor84 I suggest contacting FlightsimSoft if you have not already done so.
  13. srcooke
    Nothing to change our end. Interim solutions are to use Activesky if that is an option to you or WX2PFPX which is free and I would recommend. NAT tracks can be copy/pasted in when PFPX is switched to manual mode. Hopefully the server issues will resolve shortly.
  14. srcooke
    PFPX was switched to a new server last weekend and will take a few days to resolve issues. The developer is aware.
  15. srcooke
    Can you post the ofp if possible, failing that a snapshot of the planning screen showing route and weights.
  16. srcooke
    Oh I have to diagree with that, in use nearly every day, still yet to find as powerful a planning tool within the sim community, if only it were developed onward. Whilst really requiring specialist response my only query would be the M0.85 speed used at FL100 for the 1EO 180 and 207 entries, maybe correct. Would the APU be run with an engine out on 787, I know CAC's are used for cabin pressure which are electrically driven, just a thought.
  17. srcooke
    I usually use Min Cost that makes use of David's route charges, also Upper/Low airspace at auto. Likely the "warning messages about a feature no longer supported" relates to the IFPS automatic submission which was removed in 2.04.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy & Terms of Use