Aerosoft official retail partner for Microsoft Flight Simulator !! 
Click here for more information

Jump to content

Dave Gray

Members
  • Content Count

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2 Neutral

About Dave Gray

  • Rank
    Flight Student - Groundwork

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Exciting news. Thanks for sharing it with us. It's certainly looking more and more like MSFS has won the sim wars here. While I love the CRJ I think we all know there were certain performance issues with it. Even in V5. Do you think this will be something you guys can get past in MSFS for the CRJ? PS: I understand your decision on upgrade pricing. you guys gotta eat too!
  2. thanks guys. for whatever reasons it goes into that data folder but then creates a whole new file structure repeating the previous structure. So it goes deep into redundant file structure if that makes sense. I ended up just copying that folder it created back to where it belongs. Not ideal, but it works.
  3. I've seen a few threads here that look like they were dealing with V4 instead of V5. Two simple questions: 1. What directory should I point simbrief downloader to for CRJ pro V5 flightplans? 2. What directory should i point navigraph FMS Data manager to for airac data? The auto scan isn't picking this plane up. thanks.
  4. i have high end hardware so I prefer V5. The CTD's I originally had were fixed by reinstalling GSX. The weather needs some work I agree.
  5. To be honest Mathijs, V5 is a lot better than V4.5. For one it looks better. EA or no EA it looks better. Most importantly it is without question better on performance. An easy example is to start a vatsim flight in Montreal or Boston or JFK. In the past some of these sceneries could test my locked 30 frames. But not now. They run very smooth almost like I'm at a default airport. There is no question it is not without its problems. But it seems most who have had the proper hardware and proper settings have got it working nice and have discontinued any V4 flying. I know I have and many others. I'm disappointed that LM didn't work closely enough with the big developers to get a product that was more seamless out of the gate. That's on them, not you. I see some optimism for the future of V5. Have you ever noticed that most of the videos that have been posted in MSFS are choppy and/or fuzzy? I'll leave it alone due to the NDA. But I am honestly not sold one bit on MSFS. But the screenshots look fantastic. All frustration aside that you may have with the way V5 was introduced, I struggle to see how you can't see the things that make it better than V4.5.
  6. Do you guys plan to fix the dynamic lighting in Madeira to make it work in V5?
  7. Hey Guys. Just bought the Skalarki FCU and MCDU to use with a different a320. However I was wondering if anybody has had any luck getting them to work with the Aerosoft A330?
×
×
  • Create New...