alehead

Could this be moved to the 2024 forum? This relates only to MSFS2024... Thanks Andrew

I believe I have found my own solution. The VDGS folders are all in community. If the airports are in there too, then everything works. If an airport is in Community2024, then it cannot be verified... The Aerosoft driver etc. needs to view both community and community2024, at least that is my conclusion. Installing two copies of the airports makes no sense in terms of IT at all... By moving EDDS into community (it was installed in community2024, as it is a native 2024 airport), the aerosoft vdgs driver can now see the airport and the system works (beautifully I must add... like the new system) Andrew

The solution surely cannot be to install the airport twice, which is what I understand from the linked solution... I also cannot get the Aerosoft VDGS system to work. I have a number of activated airports. I do not use the default install location, as I do not want short of 2 Terabytes of data on the C: drive. I would like the packages for MSFS2024 to be on their own dedicated drive. I have EDDS, EDDL, EBBR, EDDB, EDDM... bought through the Contrail store. I installed the dependency files for the VDGS system through Aerosoft One I have attached my VDGS log file... (run with verbose=1) I would be interested for anyone's thoughts. Andrewaerosoft-vdgs-driver-log.log

You know, I was thinking about Angelique's reply... As an ex professional photographer I can fully understand wanting to protect content, whatever it may be. However, placing material online, regardless of techniques to thwart it, content will be copied, re-posted, uploaded under a different author and so on and so forth. And then I see that ASN has a Facebook page... a lot of content is set to public, so it can be viewed at least without having to register with them. Either way, the content use clauses on Facebook have led to me no longer posting any material whatsoever there... I find the restrictive policy of ASN right clicking not in balance with the use of Facebook... of course this is my opinion only, and I do not expect anyone to agree with my opinion, just to accept that I may have a different opinion than others... Could it at least be changed that the initial click on a link opens up in a new tab, instead of going to a new page in the same tab, whcih then links to the actual content in a new tab? I know I could use CTRL and left click, but it is not second nature to the large majority of Net users to use the keyboard while navigating sites... A

No worries Mathijs, particularly as the thread you were looking for was directly below at the time you posted... Cheers to Hero93 for the information. I had forgotten that little switch. Nomen est omen... A

All interesting stuff about the Dublin project, but it has absolutely nothing to do with my thread. Mathijs, I think you went and answered the wrong thread here... Thanks to Angelique for the information and reasoning. Of course, ASN's decision is final, but it has little effect on stopping content grabbers. At the end of the day, all it succeeds in doing is annoying me as the reader, as mentioned already. Penalising the average reader in an attempt to stop the exceptionally small minority with a method that does not stop them anyway is an odd decision in my mind... Perhaps you could programme the links to open in a new tab of the browser, like HTML target="_blank" or something, so I at least keep the home page and do not have to reload it again and again. Keep up the good work either way, thanks. A

I couldn't find a specific forum for this, so I'll put it in General. I would be interested to know why right clicking was disabled on the ASN site. I really miss the ability to open stories in a new tab, as the function to open in a new tab has not always been implemented by the web designer... Andrew

It is certainly a lesson. Taking off with four adults in a light plane at altitude is always going to be a dicey affair, particularly on warmer days. This is ideal material for a "how not to do it" story. Luckily for all involved nobody died. He should have aborted much earlier on when he failed to get off the ground properly. That was an extremely long run to take off, the alarms should have screaming in his ears at that point... A

Putting the stuff together for you right now... Just to let you know, the reg key is not Toulouse X but Aerosoft-Airport Toulouse... And I am seeing some error in the ASE log... OK, zipped and sent... A

Thanks Mathijs. Please do not hesitate to ask if you require any further details on setup or otherwise. A

Where should those .blob files exactly be? A

Thanks for dropping in. Glad I am not the only one, for what it is worth... A

OK, I have now uninstalled and reinstalled (as Administrator) no fewer than 3 times, the last time with a new download. There is something wrong with your new version of Toulouse. The activation routine works normally, whichever method I use, be it launcher or ASEData.dll via the FSX menu... The scenery shows up partially, with the red wording hovering over the runway and a large number of key buildings missing! This is frustrating. A

Could it be that the new uploaded version has another problem? I refer you to my other thread: http://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/topic/55284-airport-toulouse-listed-as-active-in-launcher-and-plug-in-dll/ Andrew