Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/22/20 in Posts

  1. Please read Mathijs' statement more carefully: He didn't said that P3Dv5 support is canceled completely. He just said, while LM is changing one part of the simulator with every update it doesn't makes any sense to update all add-ons for each and every version. Once you have done so, LM releases the next change which invalidates all update you have done before... That's what Mathijs said. Nothing more and nothing less. Most importantly he didn't say not to support P3Dv5 at all anymore. So please do not read something into a post which is simply not there.
    7 points
  2. It’s a difference if you have new settings with every update or if you work close with the simdev and have some influence to define a standard.
    3 points
  3. Sorry, we are not going into this discussion again. As I said when we do wing flex realistically (and not like some other companies do it) it would be a few pixels up and down. We feel that is not worth it.
    2 points
  4. This statement is very confusing because you are willing to spend money on a much more moving target with an incomplete SDK at MSFS? But a much more complete SDK with LM is a no-go? Very odd. It might have just been easier for you to just come out and say Aerosoft is done with P3D and no further support will be provided. What you wrote is just dancing around that anyways.
    2 points
  5. Ich kann auch gelegentlich ein Auge auf diese Foren halten. Wir bieten aber hauptsächlich Support auf den X-Plane.org Foren an, und ich will mich auch nicht zu dünn ausbreiten... aber da ich sowieso Deutsch kann, ich würde mich gerne auch mehr unter Deutsch-sprechenden Flusi Enthusiasten aufhalten.
    2 points
  6. Today did a shirt flight from Alesund to Trondheim to see the new update. After landing ATC instructed me to gate 37, but the label on the jetway says '36'. I guess it is a typo, since the adjacent gate also is labeled as gate 36. By the way, the docking system works great
    1 point
  7. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a password protected forum. Enter Password
  8. I like MSFS, it's a good game and fun and I'm working on supporting it with freeware. However, for a more complete simulator experience I'm still very much using P3D V5.x (and XP) and will continue to do so but unlikely to purchase ANY Aerosoft products based on some of the comments I've read on the Aerosoft management side. MSFS is a moving target. P3D is a moving target. XP is a moving target ... that's how we get better products, they evolve and grow this is a "normal" development cycle. I understand that Aerosoft are concerned about "moving targets" but you've already co
    1 point
  9. That problem was related to using an add-on manager having disabled EDDK (i.e. having it not in the Community folder) and then having started the update. The update then was created into a none existing EDDK folder, so just the update files were found afterwards in the EDDK community folder. When using add-on managers it is mandatory to enable an add-on before installing any updates.
    1 point
  10. The new update is out already. If you bought it from Aerosoft you can access the update in the shop. Other shop will surely have the new installer during this week. Happy landings.
    1 point
  11. I'm unable to recreate the issue with the localizer being offset, do you use any 3rd party navdata? If so I would do a test with it disabled. Regarding the 141 MB size, that's the size of the last update (1.03) so for some reason the original install of the scenery went missing We did see a similar problem when someone used a add-on manager and moved the scenery to a different location, not sure if this is what happened here though.
    1 point
  12. Hi, thanks! This will be corrected in the next version.
    1 point
  13. So you are in other words stating that you will cancel Prepar3D support, even when there is no aircraft with acceptable system depth in sight within at least the next year for your prefered simulation game? (Which is also constantly changing due to an ongoing development process and focus on "easy usablitliy" instead of deep system simulation)... I'm sure all your customers who stayed loyal to this and other projects even with the major development delays and long update intervals would appreciate some compatibility updates and even pay a small amount for it. With the steps P3D developmen
    1 point
  14. ... ich bin beeindruckt.... und wenn diese Auflösung irgendwann auch in VR verfügbar ist, schlafe ich sogar mit VR-Brille...:-)
    1 point
  15. Hallo, habe heute die neue EC135 von Rotosim herunter geladen. Erster Eindruck: Der Heli ist von außen nochmals detaillierter geworden und schaut einfach nur toll aus. Das Cockpit ist eine Wucht. Die Schalter machen einen sehr realistischen Eindruck. Die Funktionen sind wie von Rotosim sehr gut umgesetzt. Beim ersten Rundflug sind mir auf Anhieb alle Landungen wesentlich besser gelungen als mit der Version 4. Ich habe bewußt das Joystick-Profil, das ich bisher genutzt habe, verwendet. Der Heli reagiert ohne Verzögerung, sehr direkt und trotzdem sanft. Jetzt ist
    1 point
  16. An dieser Stelle möchte ich mal ein großes Dankeschön an Armin und Team aussprechen, die XE 5.3 ist super geworden. Kann es da überhaupt noch eine Steigerung geben? 😮 Das kann ich fast nicht vorstellen. Selbst Mehrfamilienhäuser mit Balkonen sind sehr detailliert dargestellt, es fehlt nur noch, dass man dort unterscheiden kann, welche Blumen in den Balkonkästen gepflanzt sind. 😃 Fazit, eine Spitzenleistung, die ihres gleichen sucht. Viele Grüße Horst
    1 point
  17. When Lockheed settles on a settings that is documented in the SDK we'll check what we can change. For now we are not willing to spend money on a moving target. Not with sales for that platform being next to zero.
    1 point
  18. Okay. It is clear we differ in opinion. You feel when a airport scenery is released the developer and publisher somehow have the task to keep it up to date. We do not agree. We never promised that. No developer EVER promised that. Now we could go on and on about this , but fact is that we sold the product without the promise to keep it updated eternally. As you are at this moment the only customer with this complaint I dare say it is not a massive issue and I take the liberty of closing this topic. If you feel you are 'pulled over a barrel' and do not agree to my explanation, I am
    1 point
  19. In a CRJ? An aircraft well known for having very stiff wings? We do have the accurate data and know in detail how much the wings flex. But in moderate conditions, on a 1080 screen, looking from the cockpit to the wingtip you, the deflection would be around 4 pixels max (oh and do not send us a zillion yt vids where the camera viewpoint moves down as the wing tip moves up). How much fps are you willing to lose to that animation? It could be up to 10%. For an effect that is simply not visible in the real aircraft?
    1 point
  20. @PilotBalu + Mitstreiter, danke für die phantastische Version 5.3. Komme gerade von einem Rundflug über Moskau zurück, den Kreml im Abendlicht bewundert und über die Vielfalt der Objekte gestaunt. XE5.3 und Ortho's können wirklich jedem Vergleich mit dem Mitbewerber standhalten. Nochmals danke und weiterhin eine gute Zeit, Wolfgang
    1 point
  21. El avión no es capaz de trazar ese arco en esa versión. Eso a veces pasa hasta en los de verdad...
    1 point
  22. Gents, we released a new version before the weekend. Aerosoft customers have the installer directly in the store or in the support database. Other stores are also very fast and will surely provide the new installer quickly (usually they don't work here on weekends). I am sorry for the inconvenience this causes. The update process is described in the manual chapter 1.7. I hope this helps.
    -1 points
  23. Believe me or not but yes I considered that. But even if I don't know when this missing exit was under construction I think 29Palms had probably many years to adjust their EDDB scenery. And your argument is not stringent at all because Aerosoft/19Palms has been able to release two updates for p3d4 in the last few days/weeks! So bloody complicated? So expensive for devs? Sorry, but if you didn't want to cheat EDDB FSX customers you should have clearly announced that this scenery doesn't fully simulate the new EDDB! But I think, that your main interest had been to empty your FSX addo
    -2 points
  24. Still haven't answered as to why the app says to go to the Support area. And when I get there, I can't get in because I haven't replied to some email I never got. Also, my first question about reinstalling could have been answer by a simple "yes," rather than the holier-than -thou responses about the manual.
    -2 points


  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?
    Sign Up
×
×
  • Create New...