DLRK

members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    68

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About DLRK

  • Rank
    Flight Student - Airwork

Recent Profile Visitors

1231 profile views
  1. DLRK
    Even if EDTO is not required/disabled, adequate airports are still added and go points are in the flight plan. Could the next version allow this to be disabled?
  2. DLRK
    I'd also like this.
  3. DLRK
    It seems that a work-around is to set step climb to no for short flights, and only turn it on for longer flights.
  4. DLRK
    Not sure if this helps, but this bug appears to only occur when the flight doesn't require a step climb. It looks like when a step climb isn't required, PFPX sets an excessively low initial altitude and an early descent.
  5. DLRK
    But how do I fix this? Will there be a patch?
  6. DLRK
    As seen here: https://imgur.com/a/XXL5zYp An early descent and level-off is planned shortly before the actual TOD. Any idea on why this would happen? No restrictions are shown in the route. Disabling step climb (setting it to "no") prevents this from happening.
  7. DLRK
    Actually, I was wrong about the early descent and level off being due to the new profile. I'll make a new thread
  8. DLRK
    Quick question about the AirlinerPerformance profile: ECON climb works fine, but ECON descent results in an early descent and level off before the final descent.
  9. DLRK
    True, but I'm using cost index.
  10. DLRK
    Use ECON climb/des?
  11. DLRK
    Is there a way to change the default PIC name to either be blank or a different name, rather than defaulting to the dispatcher/licensee name? This was an option previously.
  12. DLRK
    @srcooke Thanks for the link, I'll try out those profiles! @Emanuel Thanks for the info. So, would you recommend just picking the 250/300/.8 if it fits the fuel burn better? Also, is there a way to adjust climb bias?
  13. DLRK
    I recently came back to using PFPX and the PMDG NGX (800WL) after a while of using neither. While I eventually sorted out most of PFPX's many issues with this model (wrong weights and optimum altitudes), I seem to be getting excessive climb fuel consumption because the profile the NGX uses is not available in PFPX. While the NGX climbs at 250/300/.78, only 250/280/78 and 250/300/80 are available in PFPX. It also seems that the climb bias option has been removed in an update to PFPX. Can the climb profile be changed?