!! Windows 7 no longer supported !!

As Microsoft will stop supporting Windows 7 on Jan 20th we will be unable to test any of our
products on that platform. It may work, or it may not, but no guarantees from our side. 

Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2 Neutral

About PaladinX

  • Rank
    Flight Student - Groundwork

Recent Profile Visitors

343 profile views
  1. Thanks for the transparency, Mathijs. I love your baby Airbuses and will fly them until MSFS will completely replace my P3D, which means, until i have some good Airbusses, Twin Otters, Cessnas (all my old friends) and so on at MSFS. Just a matter of time that all Flightsim lovers will switch sooner or later. Looking forward to new Aerosoft addons there....
  2. Update: 1) Re-Installed Stuttgart 2) Put it on the top in the scenery library (there were many ORBX entries above). Works fine now. Dont know which of these two solved the problem now. Can be closed.
  3. I will try a few thinks and report about the result, thanks for the ideas.
  4. Hello, i have an confusing failure with the frequency. All my navigation data is on AIRAC 1908 (which shows freq 109.5) P3D 4.5 database updated with fsAerodata tool. Little Nav Map updated with Navigraph tool (shows me the P3D data with 109.5) Active Sky, Aerosoft Bus Professional, PMDG 737...all of the databases on 1908...all of them know 109.5. Stuttgart Professional installed, the charts tell me frequency 109.5. But no one of my aircraft can receive the ILS on 109.5 When i check the ingame map of P3D, it shows a very old frequency of 110.9. And with this, i receive the ILS. So i wanted to find out where the failure comes from. With the Airport Editor from https://www.aero.sors.fr/navaids.html I opened the scenery folder within the Aerosoft\Stuttgart Pro folders. ILS "ISTE" and "ISTW" show both the correct frequencies 109.5 and 109.9. So where the heck is the frequency 110.9 hidden? Must be in some other BGL files that are used by P3D for EDDS. Again, the scenery export in Little Nav Map from the P3D database shows the correct 109.5. I can not find out where this discrepancy comes from. As EDDS with the approach 07 from the west is my favorite arrival airport and approach...thats frustrating. Thanks for any tipps, Jan
  5. Thank you for the additional infos. I am aware about the function of the cost index. But while the speed changes more than expected (e.g. 290 kts with CI=30 to 340 kts with CI=90), i have no feeling about the fuel usage. Thats why i ask for the CI that is used with the Fuel Planner by Aerosoft. Its still unclear for me, because it contains no information.
  6. Hmm, interesting. Why does SPD Change CI 0 (which would be slower) use 64 KGS, while CI 50 (which would be faster) use only 17 KGS more? *confused* *Edit: Ok, now i understood: "M" 0064 KGS "minor"? And "P" 0017 KGS "more"?? That would be nearly neclectable, seen on the whole trip. Or do i interprete wrong?
  7. Dear Aerosoft Support Team, a fuel question: Is there a thumbrule, how to increase the amount of fuel, when i fly with a higher cost index? (E.g. when i want to fly faster, i fly with an index of 50, 70 or 90). How much more fuel do i need then compared to the results of the fuel planner? What cost index is taken in the background?
  8. I assume you loaded the flightplan (your flightplan created with PFPX and entered in your aircraft) into the P3D Flight Planner? Then you got clearance for your IFR flight? You can ignore the directions given from ATC in the first 1-2 legs of your flight. Just follow your FMC computed plan. You will stay close enough to the planned route that it will not abort the IFR flight. But you should folllow the altitudes given from ATC. There it seems to be more sensitive for deviations. Only in the approach phase, the vectors from ATC can lead far away from the computed FMC route. I fly this then with "selected" settings in the Airbus. I plan my flight, load it with the P3D Flight Planner, program the MCDU and take off. I follow the altitude steps from ATC, but i follow the lateral path from my MCDU. When coming to the arrival ATC area, i follow fully the ATC until touchdown. Works fine.
  9. Kann man Euch (Aerosoft) bei der Übersetzung der Anleitungen behilflich sein? Korrekturlesen? Oder Abschnitte ins Deutsche übersetzen? In der DCS Welt sind es durchaus Leute aus der Community, die bei den Übersetzungen der Anleitungen der einzelnen Maschinen helfen...könnten wir hier ja auch so machen.
  10. Hi Rolf - A320, correct loadsheet generated - in my case there were 136 passengers planned - MCDU3 with LSK1R - ACT was correct (136/136), but the "boarding" stayed orange, even after closing the doors. Jan
  11. Update - Cargo loading worked fine yesterday (A320) -seems to be solved 2nd issue detected - PAX Boarding did not get green after it was finished. Stayed orange all the time. But i could do and finish my flight. Thanks! Jan
  12. A good first question: I was on (i was not aware an update was released until now) I updated to right now and will try soon if that solved my problem. I will give feedback here.
  13. Hello dear Aerosoft Support Team, i have a problem with loading cargo on my A320. Conditions: 1) Loadsheet generated (with the correct Aircraft) 2) GSX not used 3) Aircraft with external power at the gate (chucks set, no engines running) 4) Both cargo doors open. In MCDU3, i load the "loadsheet", then i start all 3 steps: 1) PAX boarding is fine (number increasing) 2) Fuel loading is fine (number increasing) 3) Cargo - nothing happens. The LSK letters are "white" - no blinking, no activity, no increasing cargo visible. When i push the "instant load" button, everything is OK. Only the realistic progressive loading of cargo does not work Do i need to wait much longer? Or is something wrong in my process? Thanks for advices, Jan
  14. Hi mopperle, yes i will try in the next days. I remember there was a message from AC shortly after P3D crashed. I can not remember it so i will post a screenshot asap. Regards, Jan
  • Create New...