Jump to content

PaladinX

Members
  • Content Count

    33
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2 Neutral

About PaladinX

  • Rank
    Flight Student - Groundwork

Recent Profile Visitors

398 profile views
  1. Hi all, im thinking about the Yoke as a replacement for my old Saitek. What i am not clear about is - are drivers or special software required? Or does Windows recognize it as a usual HID with several axis and buttons? If so, why do many people use a special software? I am flying since years with a Thrustmaster Warthog (with a Virpil WarBRD Base, the TM Throttle, a Saitek Quadrant and Trim Wheel) without any additional drivers or software (not even the Thrustmaster Target Software) sucessful with DCS, F4 BMS, P3D, Sturmovik and so on... So - do i need any Honeycomb drivers for P3D v4 and v5? Thank you!
  2. Ok, so experimental 1.3.0.5. Its updated now and and the tabs seem to work without crashing P3d, at least at this first try. Hope it stays. Well done!
  3. Airbus 320 is on 1.3.0.3, installed yesterday. (i completely re-installed P3D with some addons yesterday).
  4. Thank you both, i was not aware this chapter was added to the Vol1. of the A320 documentation. Thats what i was searching for!
  5. Another question: Is it possible to deactivate it in the A318-A321?
  6. Hi there, is there any resource about the new EFB in the A320 Pro? Some kind of manual, tutorial, references, whatever? Thank you
  7. "...but for the vast majority of users this is not an issue..." Worst answer ever for a support forum, no matter what kind of product or process. Nevertheless - i am experiencing the same. A complete fresh installation, done yesterday: P3D 4.5HF2, ORBX Global (FTX, Vector EU, Landclass EU), Active Sky for P3D, Ultimate Traffic Live, Aerosoft A320. Open the named tabs, P3D closes completely to desktop.
  8. Thanks for the transparency, Mathijs. I love your baby Airbuses and will fly them until MSFS will completely replace my P3D, which means, until i have some good Airbusses, Twin Otters, Cessnas (all my old friends) and so on at MSFS. Just a matter of time that all Flightsim lovers will switch sooner or later. Looking forward to new Aerosoft addons there....
  9. Update: 1) Re-Installed Stuttgart 2) Put it on the top in the scenery library (there were many ORBX entries above). Works fine now. Dont know which of these two solved the problem now. Can be closed.
  10. I will try a few thinks and report about the result, thanks for the ideas.
  11. Hello, i have an confusing failure with the frequency. All my navigation data is on AIRAC 1908 (which shows freq 109.5) P3D 4.5 database updated with fsAerodata tool. Little Nav Map updated with Navigraph tool (shows me the P3D data with 109.5) Active Sky, Aerosoft Bus Professional, PMDG 737...all of the databases on 1908...all of them know 109.5. Stuttgart Professional installed, the charts tell me frequency 109.5. But no one of my aircraft can receive the ILS on 109.5 When i check the ingame map of P3D, it shows a very old frequency of 110.9. And with this, i receive the ILS. So i wanted to find out where the failure comes from. With the Airport Editor from https://www.aero.sors.fr/navaids.html I opened the scenery folder within the Aerosoft\Stuttgart Pro folders. ILS "ISTE" and "ISTW" show both the correct frequencies 109.5 and 109.9. So where the heck is the frequency 110.9 hidden? Must be in some other BGL files that are used by P3D for EDDS. Again, the scenery export in Little Nav Map from the P3D database shows the correct 109.5. I can not find out where this discrepancy comes from. As EDDS with the approach 07 from the west is my favorite arrival airport and approach...thats frustrating. Thanks for any tipps, Jan
  12. Thank you for the additional infos. I am aware about the function of the cost index. But while the speed changes more than expected (e.g. 290 kts with CI=30 to 340 kts with CI=90), i have no feeling about the fuel usage. Thats why i ask for the CI that is used with the Fuel Planner by Aerosoft. Its still unclear for me, because it contains no information.
  13. Hmm, interesting. Why does SPD Change CI 0 (which would be slower) use 64 KGS, while CI 50 (which would be faster) use only 17 KGS more? *confused* *Edit: Ok, now i understood: "M" 0064 KGS "minor"? And "P" 0017 KGS "more"?? That would be nearly neclectable, seen on the whole trip. Or do i interprete wrong?
  14. Dear Aerosoft Support Team, a fuel question: Is there a thumbrule, how to increase the amount of fuel, when i fly with a higher cost index? (E.g. when i want to fly faster, i fly with an index of 50, 70 or 90). How much more fuel do i need then compared to the results of the fuel planner? What cost index is taken in the background?
×
×
  • Create New...