RemySarkis 16 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 Hi Mathjis, I have a question a little bit off topic. Just wondering is the A330 different from A320 and A321 systems wise. Regardless of the range, size and weight. Or it has different nd and so on? Thank u Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 Sotty I couldn´t finis the post.This one is the approach to Madrid (return flight). Best. Miquel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted November 29, 2012 Author Aerosoft Share Posted November 29, 2012 Hi Mathjis, I have a question a little bit off topic. Just wondering is the A330 different from A320 and A321 systems wise. Regardless of the range, size and weight. Or it has different nd and so on? Thank u Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2 As far as we know the PFD and the ND are identical. But the ECAMs, FMGS, AP and other systems are different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest AlitaliaAirbus Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 quick question ... to know, I know it's trivial and not important, the "wheel" of the airbus, one for steering on the ground, turn? another question, maybe you have already answered, what would be the problems that will slow these days .... I saw that we have passed to be optimistic, to December, pessimistic. thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pecheur5500 8 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 Hi, i will certainely buy the Airbus X Extended, but can you tell me if it needs more system requirements than PMDG 737? Does it decrease FPS like PMDG 737 or less/not ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AngelSandAirWaves 89 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 Hi, i will certainely buy the Airbus X Extended, but can you tell me if it needs more system requirements than PMDG 737? Does it decrease FPS like PMDG 737 or less/not ? performance is better than the default A321 they said, so no problem there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swofford 13 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 According to all the testers the FPS is quite a bit better with this than the NGX. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pecheur5500 8 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 According to all the testers the FPS is quite a bit better with this than the NGX. ok thank you, if it's like PMDG it is ok, but lower is better! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ugom13 11 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 Hi everybody, Do you want to see how an A318 X would look like? A little answer: Of course, it's a photomontage! bye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kannwar 3 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 performance is better than the default A321 they said, so no problem there I think they said it was "comparable" to the default A321 but I highly doubt a complex addon like this will perform better than a stock FSX model =(. Would be great if it did though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emi 5161 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 I think they said it was "comparable" to the default A321 but I highly doubt a complex addon like this will perform better than a stock FSX model =(. Would be great if it did though. Performance is not as good as on the default, but you can't expect that with the advanced systems and graphics included in this addon. But it's still very nice and better than on many other airliners out there. Just to give you something to compare: In the Airbus X Exteded I get around 5 fps more than in the 737NGX. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kannwar 3 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 Performance is not as good as on the default, but you can't expect that with the advanced systems and graphics included in this addon. But it's still very nice and better than on many other airliners out there. Just to give you something to compare: In the Airbus X Exteded I get around 5 fps more than in the 737NGX. Yep that's what I was thinking. Are you able to say how close it is to the original Airbus X in terms of performance? On another note I'm guessing SteMapelli died? Haven't seen any more strange posts from him in a while... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafal Haczek 1612 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 I'm guessing SteMapelli died? I'm sure he's alive. Just not posting here anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emi 5161 Posted November 29, 2012 Share Posted November 29, 2012 Yep that's what I was thinking. Are you able to say how close it is to the original Airbus X in terms of performance? On another note I'm guessing SteMapelli died? Haven't seen any more strange posts from him in a while... moderators put him under a status in which every single post from him has to be confirmed by a moderator before it is displayed to the public, that's why you don't see his posts here anymore. I'm sure if he'll post something useful in the future it'll show up here. Though I didn't fly the original Airbus X for quite some time now the Extended is a little better on my system. But the original Airbus X doesn't perform good on my system anyway. It's a little worse than the NGX and the Extended is a little better than the NGX. But all of this is still subject to change of cause. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KyleD 1027 Posted November 30, 2012 Share Posted November 30, 2012 Yep that's what I was thinking. Are you able to say how close it is to the original Airbus X in terms of performance? For me, I notice no difference in performance, it's just as good. I don't have any hard numbers/averages, I'm strictly talking through use and feel. Like Emi I have better performance in the Extended than in the NGX, as well as better than the J41, and a little better than the QW757. So you all can compare: Win 7 64-bit FSX Gold, SP2 + Accel installed i7-2600 3.4ghz Nvidia GT545 1gb 8gb RAM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmoreira 29 Posted November 30, 2012 Share Posted November 30, 2012 What's about the typical "air-noise"? Might you be referring to the airflow noise caused by the extension of the landing lights? It's also a very distinctive feature on the Airbus. Here goes my question, is this effect included? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kannwar 3 Posted November 30, 2012 Share Posted November 30, 2012 moderators put him under a status in which every single post from him has to be confirmed by a moderator before it is displayed to the public, that's why you don't see his posts here anymore. I'm sure if he'll post something useful in the future it'll show up here. Though I didn't fly the original Airbus X for quite some time now the Extended is a little better on my system. But the original Airbus X doesn't perform good on my system anyway. It's a little worse than the NGX and the Extended is a little better than the NGX. But all of this is still subject to change of cause. Oh I see...poor him. Anyway your results with the Airbus X performance are interesting. At least it won't be any worse than the Airbus X. I've been too scared to try the NGX because I figured it would be worse than the Airbus X but now I"m not so sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted November 30, 2012 Author Aerosoft Share Posted November 30, 2012 quick question ... to know, I know it's trivial and not important, the "wheel" of the airbus, one for steering on the ground, turn? Yes the tiller is animated and moves when it should move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted November 30, 2012 Author Aerosoft Share Posted November 30, 2012 performance is better than the default A321 they said, so no problem there Well with all code that's not something we can say anymore, but it's about 40% to 50% better then the NGX (of course because that has deeper systems). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swofford 13 Posted November 30, 2012 Share Posted November 30, 2012 Impressive stuff. Even though I'm not an Airbus fan at all will pick this up for something different and for support of you guys! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tup61 185 Posted November 30, 2012 Share Posted November 30, 2012 I am having a lot of fun lately with the original Airbus X. Instead of going from cold and dark to cold and dark again as I did when I bought the plane two years ago (and as I did with the PMDG 737NGX I bought later on) I am using the Airbus X in a 'lighter mode' now. I simply load the taxi state and spend less time preparing everything. I think I am using the plane more as it was intended now. I haven't flown airliners for a year now and I found the Airbus X the easiest and nicest one to quickly get into again. Also thanks to my own checklists which I created way back then. Anyway, this advanced version is more in depth and more 'hard core' maybe and I am still unsure if I will buy it (because I may not need the extra's it offers) but then again... it will be quite cheap (since I own the original version) and I do suppose it still will be possible to fly it the easy way, just as I fly the old Airbus X...? (My favorite pastime this week is flying the Airbus X with default FSX ATC with HDG in manual mode and altitude in managed mode: it's all very easy to do and it works like a charm, even up to autolanding). This leads me to the following question (to which I couldn't find an answer): will I still be able to simply load an FSX flightplan into the advanced version? Or do I need to enter the plan into the MCDU manually? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emi 5161 Posted November 30, 2012 Share Posted November 30, 2012 I am having a lot of fun lately with the original Airbus X. Instead of going from cold and dark to cold and dark again as I did when I bought the plane two years ago (and as I did with the PMDG 737NGX I bought later on) I am using the Airbus X in a 'lighter mode' now. I simply load the taxi state and spend less time preparing everything. I think I am using the plane more as it was intended now. I haven't flown airliners for a year now and I found the Airbus X the easiest and nicest one to quickly get into again. Also thanks to my own checklists which I created way back then. Anyway, this advanced version is more in depth and more 'hard core' maybe and I am still unsure if I will buy it (because I may not need the extra's it offers) but then again... it will be quite cheap (since I own the original version) and I do suppose it still will be possible to fly it the easy way, just as I fly the old Airbus X...? (My favorite pastime this week is flying the Airbus X with default FSX ATC with HDG in manual mode and altitude in managed mode: it's all very easy to do and it works like a charm, even up to autolanding). This leads me to the following question (to which I couldn't find an answer): will I still be able to simply load an FSX flightplan into the advanced version? Or do I need to enter the plan into the MCDU manually? As far as I know you'll have to enter it manually, but I think there were some plans about importing FSX plans? Not very sure as I do always enter it manually... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted November 30, 2012 Author Aerosoft Share Posted November 30, 2012 As far as I know you'll have to enter it manually, but I think there were some plans about importing FSX plans? Not very sure as I do always enter it manually... You are able to store and retrieve flight plans but not use the standard flight plans as these do not contain all data. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RemySarkis 16 Posted November 30, 2012 Share Posted November 30, 2012 You are able to store and retrieve flight plans but not use the standard flight plans as these do not contain all data. plus FSX does not have the SID and STARS, and not updated flight plans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swofford 13 Posted November 30, 2012 Share Posted November 30, 2012 I assume can import fsbuild plans? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
![Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account]](https://forum.aerosoft.com/uploads/monthly_2023_09/Aerosoft_Social_Media_Profilbild_Neu23.thumb.jpg.03721825e6a434ed4af0c8b2b73a5898.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.