Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Aerosoft

A 30hp two-seater. Gotta love the need for frugality in post-Depression America!

And where the lessons went in post Double-dip 21st century..! :rolleyes:

The Falcon Ultralight we sell got 27 hp. go figure.

Link to comment
https://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/topic/44496-e2c/#findComment-298078
Share on other sites

As the title says E2c, while the post says Ec2,

I suppose it's more likely he means the Northrop Grumman E-2c Hawkeye...

:P:D

But nice find though on the little Cessna... never seen it before...

The importance of proper grammar and a complete and thorough post is once again given.

And it's not just simmers: Look at the `HU-1` Huey - That only became the UH-1 after a typo.

Still agree the Cessna is far more interesting than a .....zzzzzzzzzZZZZZ :lazy_s:

Link to comment
https://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/topic/44496-e2c/#findComment-298114
Share on other sites

The importance of proper grammar and a complete and thorough post is once again given.

And it's not just simmers: Look at the `HU-1` Huey - That only became the UH-1 after a typo.

Still agree the Cessna is far more interesting than a .....zzzzzzzzzZZZZZ :lazy_s:

Dyslexcia must be more rampant that we first thought :blink:

Link to comment
https://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/topic/44496-e2c/#findComment-298137
Share on other sites

I often regard the value of the contribution of the post to be proportional to the care and ability shown in its presentation. There really is no excuse for poor grammar or spelling - it's what education and a spell check package is for.

For example, this topic could easily have been a useful treatise on the relative merits of the Grumman E2C versus the current state-of -the art E2D. If our OP had posited on that basis a meaningful discussion might have ensued about the eclectic choice of carrier-borne AEW aircraft - something which has about as much relevance to FSX as a chocolate teapot as no way is such a resource used for anything other than medium altitude surveillance usually over the top of a carrier fleet. About as much simulating fun as picking toenails, but that's just me. But if there was some semblance of cohesive thought and rationalised justification it might have garnered a few adherents...

As it is, it hasn't - and we've had more interest in an early Cessna! :lol:

On that basis I'd suggest my original reply was both thorough, and correct.

Link to comment
https://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/topic/44496-e2c/#findComment-298199
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy & Terms of Use