Please put your post in the correct forum.
Today we had to move over 150 posts manually.  We do feel the forum structure is logical and the section names are clear. As redirecting posts pollute the forum a lot we will not add them anymore. So if you are unable to find your post, look for it in the most logical forum section.

Jump to content

datguytho

members
  • Content Count

    198
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by datguytho

  1. Cheers Jo, those files work. Apparently you're right - Simmarket still got the old SODE files.
  2. I'm aware of the fact there are no jetways for those stands. What I'm asking for is a parking spot in the AFD, so that one can actually make use of those stands.
  3. Hey Jo, yes - I downloaded the latest SODE zip available on Simmarket.
  4. Hey, any plans on adding those two stands to the afcad as well?
  5. Hi, ein kleines Status-Update würde ich auch sehr begrüßen
  6. Hi, könntest mal die Fuel Policies anschauen. Dort steht drin, wann welche Komponente mit wieviel berechnet wird. Generell gibt es bei guten Flugbedingungen (also immer, wenn nur 1 Destination Alternate angegeben ist) keine Notwendigkeit, ein Holding Fuel mitzunehmen.
  7. Hallo zusammen, kann David nur zustimmen. In Europa werden Transitions nicht geplant. Selbst für Flughäfen wie Budapest werden keine Transitions geplant, auch wenn es in Budapest gar keine STARs gibt und üblicherweise Transitions benutzt werden. In diesem Fall würde im ATC FPL dann einfach ein "DCT" anstelle einer STAR stehen. Natürlich müsstest du dementsprechend mehr Treibstoff als Circuit In einplanen. Das gleiche gilt übrigens auch für STARs, die mit "ATC" markiert sind. Diese darf man ebenfalls nicht für die Planung heranziehen. SID Transitions (wie sie beispielsweise in Italien üblich sind) dürfen und müssen zumeist auch entsprechend geplant werden.
  8. Basically turbulence. So obviously green indicates areas of light turbulence, while tan means moderate and red severe turbulence.
  9. Hi, I've just noticed that when printing out the NOTAMs via the according tab the category is given after the designator. Will this also be made available when printing out an OFP, along with the NOTAM briefing?
  10. Hi, Company Data -> Fuel Policy -> Enroute Reserve Fuel
  11. Configuration > Planning / Units at the bottom
  12. Sorry, just realized I misread your question totally. Ignore me, it's late where I live!
  13. Hi, you can customize the weather trend (that's what all the colours stand for) to your own liking by going to "Configuration > Planning Units". There you have several options regarding visibility, ceiling and wind speeds at the buttom. By clicking on "WX Alert" you will see a drop down menu of all different kinds of WX conditions and also which one triggers which colour. The weather trend is then visualized based on the current METAR and TAFs. A grey bar indicates that the weather forecast doesn't apply to that specific timeframe. Hope that helps.
  14. That's not entirely correct. You can still file F350 as your initial altitude - even if this technically didn't comply with the restrictions of the first airway. IFPS is taking climb and descent profiles into account based on the aircraft type you file. If IFPS is acting up and giving you errors you can simply refile your initial RFL and add your final altitude to the waypoint as you exit the airway that restricts your climb. Also, for instance, climbing out of the London TMA you would always apply the latter method. I don't necessarily see a problem with the routing PFPX gave you there either. IFPS seems to be okay with both ways in this case as well.
  15. Just to give you an example of how it could be used. If you want to determine the VIS/RVR/VV/Ceiling WX minima that an airport has to meet before it can be filed as an alternate airport, you would have to know which approach systems are available. So if you already know that the expected runway got an ILS, you could simply filter for "ILS" and it will show you any possible downgrades regarding the ILS that you would have to take into account.
  16. Please just show me one example of an document that included the summary page. Of course, you can have a section in your OFP that looks similar and shows the same values as the Summary page, but the summary page itself is not printed out.
  17. Why should it? It doesn't belong to the OFP. Most data of this is covered by a realistic OFP template though.
  18. Hi there, I've also asked this question multiple times in another thread. Apparently the situation will remain the same unfortunately.
  19. Sorry for asking this again, but will the tropopause height data be included in this new update? I know this used to be an issue with your weather data provider, has anything changed in the meantime? Would be quite nice to have this data available, as there are some study level aircraft out there which actually use this Tropo Height to create a realistic optimum for cruise.
  20. If you have your aircraft profile properly set up, the aircraft reg will be added after you compute the flight. So if you finish a flight, go to the results page and open up the IFPS validation tool again, the reg will correctly be added. In other words, you can basically ignore this error.
  21. First off, congratulations! Secondly, will we be able to get the tropopause height along with this new update or in the future per chance?
  22. Obviously I do own the product and I've also flown it for a couple of hours, otherwise I would not waste my time writing in this forum.
  23. Sure, the only thing that prevents me from doing a list of all the things that I'm disliking about the current state is simply that it would take too long, even if I excluded all the minor bugs that hopefully will be fixed in a few months. Also: I don't want to make an emergency landing after cabin depressurization, following a dual engine failure and inoperative RA's. All I want is a believable experience in the sim when flying from A to B. Remember that I've been stuck with Aerosoft Busses for quite a long time. In my opinion, it's just time for an upgrade. If you are enjoying the Aerosoft Busses, then that is absolutely great. I just don't. Still, this is all my personal opinion, based on my own expectations towards a flight sim addon. And as you've been asking for my opinion, here it is.
  24. Yes, I can live with the way that company behaves, otherwise I would not buy their stuff. Furthermore, no, I most certainly do not want to do abnormals. As I've been following the development of the Aerosoft Airbus for quite a while now, Aerosoft claimed to model normal ops to a realistic and believable extent. In my eyes, you simply did not deliver to meet my expectations. And I'm not referring to the bugs of the initial release there. Anyways, thanks for the coffee!
  25. So.. how do I like the busses? Probably worth the money if you were a customer before. However, for me personally it helped me to realize that I will need to save up for the busses by a different company.
×
×
  • Create New...