harpsi

It solved if I disable EGLC airport from VFR scenery. Tks. harpsi

I already did that and I still have the traffic there... harpsi

Hi Is there a way to take the AI aircrafts from EGLC out? I have no AI traffic packages installed which means that those aircrafts are coming from the scenery itself... Tks harpsi

Hi I tried to download version 1.01 from Stavanger but the zip file still shows version 1.00. Is it possible to correct this issue? Thanks. harpsi

Hi Is it possible to have PAKT from ORBX also modelled? I know that this airport has a lot of limitations because of all de level degrees of altitude, but at least a pushback car from gate 1 and 2 and 1 fuel car... Passengers modeling maybe not needed. Due to the limitations the pushback car would be fair enough harpsi

Roger sir harpsi

Latest libraries? harpsi

Well, I understand all the explanations but none of them answer directly to my question. I would like an answer like "yes or no" to the question "do I need to install DirectX 9c over DirectX 11 or should I leave it like that?" As I understood I should leave it like it is now... harpsi

Hi There is something that I don´t understand and if the question is about FS addons from aerosoft or from other company, it is related to FSX as well, because nothing runs without FSX DX11 is installed but DX9 is there as well? Do I need to run directX 9.0c and it will go over DX11? Or I just leave it like that? I am using Windows 7 ultimate 64 bits... I am using GTX580 as a videocard. harpsi

Hi It is known that windows 7 ultimate 64 bits comes with DirectX 11 installed. 1. Are aerosoft addons compatible with directX 11? 2. The same question for almost all other addons like flytampa, orbx, flight1 and so on... 3. If not, how can we uninstall DirectX11 and install directX 9.0c? harpsi

Thanks for the advices harpsi

Hi I have my new system for FSX which is: - Processor i7-2600k - Mobo Asus P8Z68-V Pro - Corsair Hydro 80 - Asus nvidia GTX580 1536MB DDR5 - G. Skill 2X4GB 1600 CL7 - one SSD harddisk for Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bits - PSU TX950W - Case Corsair Graphite CC600T I would like to overclock it and the settings I am trying are these: - bclk 100 - multiplier 49 - ram memory set to manual ddr3-1600 - PLL enabled - EPU power disabled - LLC ultrahigh - VRM set to manual 350 - phase control and duty control (I don´t know what they are) set to extreme - cpu capability set to 140% - cpu voltage 1.470V - dram voltage 1.60000 - vccio, cpu pll and pch voltage set to auto - hypertreading disabled - EIST and CPU C1E enabled - CPU C3 and C6 reports disabled >>> Temperatures under REAL TEMP 3.60 version: under 73ºC (between 60 and 73 more or less) >>> Core voltage under CPU-Z: 1.456V Any suggestion in order to get 4.9GHz stable or even go up to 5GHz? And another question: should I run all aerosoft addons with for example PMDG NGX, ai traffic 100 %, AES and all those beautiful things as well as almost all the sliders to the right, at 25 or 30 frames minimum with those specs? I hope I can stabilize the processor at 4.9GHz... at least... harpsi

Can it be: E:\Microsoft Games\Microsoft Flight Simulator X? harpsi

Hi One of the most important features I would like to see on the new simulator would be weather radar and terrain in all aircrafts. I see that many teams like PMDG, Level D, Airsimmer and so on are developing new aircrafts, more complex, but there are still some things that are missing in all of them, and these ones are for sure two of them. When we speak about weather radar, imediately comes the answer that it is not possible on Flight Simulator and bla bla bla... Another issue which was never solved would be the possibility to have an afcad where one runway has one side closed for landing and the other side closed for takeoff or even for both operations or none of them. Schiphol is a good example of how you can never do a real afcad with just one file in order to reproduce all possible weather conditions. A third issue just for now, would be possibility of pushback trucks for all AI aircrafts. It is very ugly that you can make your pushback with such a brilliant program like AES but you still have to see all other aircrafts making strange turns after pushback and before taxi. harpsi

It´s a choice. 100 % realistic operations at Schiphol are impossible with one afcad. Amost every runway is used for takeoff in one side and for landing in the other side. You can say that it is not 100 % confortable to have a lot of afcads in one package but you can´t say that they are not realistic. Anyway, there are a lot of afcads according to real life operations, so that everyone can choose whatever they like. And there are a lot of tricky things at this airport. For example without shortened runways you will never see take-offs at 36 L because it is too far from the aprons. And of course, it it not really realistic to have runway 09 always in use for TO. Just two examples of how difficult this airport is to configure. harpsi