pierre fsx 3 Posted March 24, 2019 Share Posted March 24, 2019 Hi, Even if I put KG's in the Preferred Units option (weight) when I create a flight plan and I open the Summary report, all the weights are in LB's not in Kilo's. What I am doing wrong? I would like to have the report in KG's Pierre Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil747fan 52 Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 hello Pierre, could you post the plan you used and also the airplane? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pierre fsx 3 Posted March 25, 2019 Author Share Posted March 25, 2019 Hi, After a few hour of searching today, I found out that i also need to set the plane in kg mode. So now all is good. I do have another question, i created a flight plan from LFPG to LIMC, the plane is A318. When i generate the route PFPx created a flight plan at FL190, even if i requested a high level route. When i validate the flight, i get a series of zone violations. I am not able to create a high level (FL320) flight plan. Pierre Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
srcooke 422 Posted March 26, 2019 Share Posted March 26, 2019 The number of restrictions creates difficulties in automatically generating a route, even for IFPS. Either disable the restrictions and drill down the list or modify the proposed route until a satisfactory outcome. As you have not provided any information at all planning here initially routes via LATRA and subsequently low airway A3, clearly not what you require. Adjusting the departure via OKASI and meeting the required FL at LURAG results in a valid plan (FL capped to 335): (FPL-DAESO-IN -A320/M-SDE1FGHIJ1RWXYZ/LB1 -LFPG1210 -N0423F330 OKASI UL612 MILPA UM135 MOBLO/N0409F290 UM135 LURAG M135 TOP -LIMC0117 LIME -PBN/A1B1C1D1L1O1S1 NAV/RNVD1E2A1 DOF/190326 REG/DAESO EET/LSAC0041 LIMM0048 RVR/75 OPR/ / / PER/C -E/0227) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pierre fsx 3 Posted March 26, 2019 Author Share Posted March 26, 2019 Ok This is the plan I was using see attach. I was under the impression that PFPX would deal with all the restrictions. So now I will pay more attention to them. I did not experience this when I was flying the reverse route (LIMC-LFPG) Thanks AFR442 LFPG-LIMC (25-Mar-2019) #1.txt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
srcooke 422 Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 Your route matches planning in lower airspace and is the only way I can achieve that result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emi 5161 Posted March 27, 2019 Share Posted March 27, 2019 11 hours ago, pierre fsx said: Ok This is the plan I was using see attach. I was under the impression that PFPX would deal with all the restrictions. So now I will pay more attention to them. I did not experience this when I was flying the reverse route (LIMC-LFPG) Thanks AFR442 LFPG-LIMC (25-Mar-2019) #1.txt 118.58 kB · 2 downloads PFPX tries its best to deal with all those restrictions, however even the multi million dollar dispatching programs used by real airlines often can't keep up with the complexity of european airspace. That's why you still have people sitting there, overseeing the whole process and stepping in where the system can't work it out. Also make sure you download the latest RAD's so that PFPX actually even knows about the restrictions in place! You can find them in the downloadsection here in the forums. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.