Recently we have seen a lot of codes used to unlock our products being offered for discounted prices. Almost all of them are bought using stolen credit cards. These codes will all be blocked by our systems and you will have to try to get your money back from the seller, we are unable to assist in these matters. Do be very careful when you see a deal that is almost too good to be true, it probably is too good to be true.

Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
vali

Latest update, fpln following issue

Recommended Posts

I installed the SP1... still issues with it.

LNAV issue. 

FPLN> EDDM ANKE9N ANKER Y104 AKINI AKIN5T EDDN

After AKINI, instead of going to next point UPALA (in the legs), the plane gone straight..

After such a long time I expected finally a working CRJ. Also at clearing some legs, fpln is displayed interrupted on ND fpln.

 

Also if the cruise level is FL100 and there are some altitude constraints in the fpln due to STAR, I saw TOD is displayed later on the fpln than the constraints (eg. FL100, constraint is 8000 feet at DN454, TOD is displayed after DN453 on the transition)

Share this post


Link to post

I cleaned the flightplan up after entering it (removed duplicated points using shortcuts on the LEGS page). The result is this: EDDMEDDN.flp

The AKINI->UPALA leg (there was a route discontinuity before) works just fine and so does the calculation of the TOD without duplicate waypoints on the STAR (AKIN5T -> ILS27-Z / DOSIS). I can only see issues before the flightplan is cleaned up.

Share this post


Link to post

I will re-do the flight next days by cleaning for example AKINI duplicate. Lets see how it works. Thanks for the feedback.

I used ILS 10 on my flight (rwy 10 was the active at the time of my flight today).

Share this post


Link to post

The runway doesn't really matter because the STAR and approach are more or less the same. I used 28 because I assumed the wind in Nürnberg to be similar to München.

Share this post


Link to post
On 7/21/2018 at 8:03 PM, Hans Hartmann said:

The runway doesn't really matter because the STAR and approach are more or less the same. I used 28 because I assumed the wind in Nürnberg to be similar to München.

 

I did a new flight, without duplicate seems to work. Usually I clean the plan at LEGS page but I had issues in the past so this is why I kept the duplicate. This can be seen also in Vol6_FMS.pdf at page 53 with VIBIS.

Sometimes there is some overshot at step angle turns but it works.

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...