cqghost 0 Posted November 12, 2017 Share Posted November 12, 2017 In settings I have set my weight for adults and children to 195lb to be in line with the PMDG 777. For some reason, when I plan a flight the adult weights do not increase to 195 on non-scheduled flight. Instead it maxes at 183 regardless of what is set in settings. For scheduled air service flights the adult weight maxes at 194 and won't go higher regardless of what's set in settings. Please login to display this image. Please login to display this image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlightSimSoft.com 283 Posted November 12, 2017 Share Posted November 12, 2017 What PFPX version do you use? - do you already try with the hotfix? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cqghost 0 Posted November 13, 2017 Author Share Posted November 13, 2017 I'm using 1.28.9i - The most recent version. Maybe this is a problem solely with mine? Would I need to uninstall and re-install? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
srcooke 422 Posted November 13, 2017 Share Posted November 13, 2017 4 hours ago, cqghost said: Maybe this is a problem solely with mine? Would I need to uninstall and re-install? Do not reinstall, the issue can be replicated here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlightSimSoft.com 283 Posted November 13, 2017 Share Posted November 13, 2017 It´s on our To-Do list for next update. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anxarces 10 Posted November 13, 2017 Share Posted November 13, 2017 While fixing this weight bug would it be possible to specify more than one weight profile? Different aircrafts use different values values (even PMDG planes are not consistent). In another thread I found the suggestion to add different weight configurations which could be selected in the aircraft configuration to link a profile to a plane. However, that feature did not make it into PFPX yet. Would be great to have this option. Regards, Uli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cqghost 0 Posted November 14, 2017 Author Share Posted November 14, 2017 18 hours ago, FlightSimSoft.com said: It´s on our To-Do list for next update. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windshear1 0 Posted April 11, 2018 Share Posted April 11, 2018 Any idea when this bug will be fixed ? Kind regards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jordanal 21 Posted April 29, 2018 Share Posted April 29, 2018 I figured out today, to only use the "Children" box for passengers - no adults or infant values. Then the weights entered in the "Preferences" section is honored correctly. The bug is in the "Adults" value field.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jordanal 21 Posted May 12, 2018 Share Posted May 12, 2018 On 4/29/2018 at 6:37 PM, jordanal said: I figured out today, to only use the "Children" box for passengers - no adults or infant values. Then the weights entered in the "Preferences" section is honored correctly. The bug is in the "Adults" value field.... I addition, I later figured out, after you send the PFPX plan with Children only values to TopCat, you must change the number of people in TopCat back to adults. So I set the weights preferences of children in PFPX and adults in Topcat the same (PMDG aircraft use 175 or 195 lbs). The reason you have to do this children/adults switch is the stupid preference for Children weight in Topcat won't go up to 175/195 lbs; it's a fix-value field. So in PFPX I set each plan using 'Children' only value (no adults or infants). After exporting to TopCat and switch to it, I 'CUT' the children value and 'Paste' it in the Adults field, and set Children back to 0. The weight-math per person (175 or 195 lbs) then works out perfectly in PFPX and TopCat. Jeee…. I sure wish they would fix this stupid bug! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captain boeing 0 Posted December 7, 2018 Share Posted December 7, 2018 You would think this would be an easy bug to fix. Its still there in version 2.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.