We have at this moment problems with e-mails coming to us via Microsoft servers (Outlook, Hotmail, Live, etc). We are in contact with Microsoft to solve this issue.

Jump to content

jordanal

Members
  • Content Count

    65
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

21 Excellent

About jordanal

  • Rank
    Flight Student - Airwork

Recent Profile Visitors

3901 profile views
  1. Ditto - I would really like to see the adult passenger weights bug fix released, sooner rather than later!
  2. I addition, I later figured out, after you send the PFPX plan with Children only values to TopCat, you must change the number of people in TopCat back to adults. So I set the weights preferences of children in PFPX and adults in Topcat the same (PMDG aircraft use 175 or 195 lbs). The reason you have to do this children/adults switch is the stupid preference for Children weight in Topcat won't go up to 175/195 lbs; it's a fix-value field. So in PFPX I set each plan using 'Children' only value (no adults or infants). After exporting to TopCat and switch to it, I 'CUT' the children value and 'Paste' it in the Adults field, and set Children back to 0. The weight-math per person (175 or 195 lbs) then works out perfectly in PFPX and TopCat. Jeee…. I sure wish they would fix this stupid bug!
  3. I figured out today, to only use the "Children" box for passengers - no adults or infant values. Then the weights entered in the "Preferences" section is honored correctly. The bug is in the "Adults" value field....
  4. ICAO: KLGB NAME: Long Beach Airport (Daugherty Field) v4 TYPE: Freeware FS: FSX DESIGNER: SunskyJet - Shehryar (Shez) Ansari LINK: http://library.avsim.net/esearch.php?CatID=fsxscen&DLID=184359 Original Preview Discussion: http://www.sunskyjet.com/forum/index.php?topic=5044.0
  5. ICAO: KCLT NAME: Charlotte Intl 2013 v2 TYPE: Payware FS: FS9 & (FSX - Just Released) DESIGNER: ImagineSim LINK: http://www.imaginesim.com/kclt01.htm AES 2.31
  6. ICAO: TJSJ NAME: San Juan Luis Munoz Marin Airport, Puerto Rico SP1 Update TYPE: Payware FS: FSX DESIGNER: ImagineSim LINK: http://www.imaginesim.com/tjsjupdates01.htm
  7. ICAO: KCVG NAME: Cincinnati Northern Kentucky Intl SP1 Update TYPE: Payware FS: FSX DESIGNER: ImagineSim LINK: http://www.imaginesi...vgupdates01.htm
  8. ICAO: KSJC NAME: San Jose Intl SP1 Update TYPE: Payware FS: FSX DESIGNER: ImagineSim LINK: http://www.imaginesim.com/ksjcupdates01.htm AES 2.00, Update don't effect AES here
  9. ICAO: KCLT NAME: Charlotte Intl SP1 Update TYPE: Payware FS: FSX DESIGNER: ImagineSim LINK: http://www.imaginesim.com/kcltupdates01.htm AES 2.31
  10. ICAO: KIAD Name: Washington Dulles Intl v2 SP1 Type: Payware - Free SP1 Update, Including new AFCAD FS: FSX Designer: ImagineSim Link: http://www.imaginesim.com/kiadupdates01.htm AES 1.99, Update don't effect AES here
  11. ICAO: KATL NAME: Atlanta Heartsfield Intl 2012 v3 TYPE: Payware FS: FS9/FSX DESIGNER: ImagineSim Link: http://www.imaginesim.com/katl01.htm AES 2.26
  12. V2 of the Armi Project (VTBS) was just released. An AES upgrade from v1 to v2 for both FSX and FS9 would be great. ICAO: VTBS NAME: SUVARNABHUMI INTL TYPE: Payware - v2 is free upgrade from SimMarket. FS: FS9 & FSX DESIGNER: Armi Project LINK: http://secure.simmar...-intl-fsx.phtml AES 2.09, Version 2012 compatible to 2010 Version regarding AES
  13. Ah, that explains it - thanks oliver. I advised my fellow NGX drivers accordingly here: http://forum.avsim.net/topic/352278-aes-config-data-pmdg-737-ngx/page__view__findpost__p__2198804 I look forward to the selection enahancement as well.
  14. BUMP - Oliver, I just wondered if you read my post above. Thanks.
  15. Has the height that determins the type of cargo loader used been changed in AES 2.20? For my PMDG NGX aircraft, I had 1.7 for the front and 2.0 for rear cargo holds and both would use the belt-type loader. Since AES 2.20, the rear (2.0) has been using the skid-type cargo loader, which is super unrealistic for the 737. In comparison, the Level-D 763 cargo holds I have set 2.35 and I would still like to see belt-loaders even with the 763. Now my PMDG 747 has the cargo holds at 3.1 and the skid-loader might be appropriate on the Queen. Can you please change the height that determines when the skid-type cargo loader used to 2.5 or greater? Thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...