Jump to content

Autopiloth

Developer
  • Posts

    559
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Autopiloth last won the day on November 23 2020

Autopiloth had the most liked content!

2 Followers

About Autopiloth

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Autopiloth's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In Rare

Recent Badges

384

Reputation

  1. With the kind help of Ulrich and Uwe I was able to setup a new build of EDDH which excludes these trees. A new 1.0.1.0 Version will be available for download soon (on monday I guess) Mit freundlicher Unterstützung von Ulrich und Uwe konnte ich eine EDDH Version generieren, die die Bäume unterdrückt. Bald wird eine neue Vollversion zum Download zur Verfügung stehen. Ich denke mal am Montag, wenn der neue Installer fertig sein wird Nochmals vielen Dank allen Beteiligten Thorsten
  2. Hi, the shimmering is caused by MSFS. When a lot of vertical or horizontal lines are present MSFS starts to display a shadow "moiré" artefact that looks like shimmering. Nothing that I can solve despite removing the hangar door and roof details... Thorsten
  3. Update: Habe jetzt eine content.xml bekommen. Danke. Wir versuchen jetzt das Problem zu identifizieren.
  4. Hallo, ich stehe auch vor einem Rätsel, wo die Bäume herkommen. Könnte ich bitte die CONTENT.XML aus dem Verzeichnis "user"/AppData/Local/Packages/Microsoft.Flghtsimulatorxxxxxxxxxxx/LocalCache bekommen um mal querzuchecken, was da reinfunken könnte ? Gern auch per mail an mail[at]sim-wings.de. Ich habe bei mir Hamburg in der content.xml (definiert quasi die Reihenfolge) ganz nach oben, in die Mitte und ganz nach unten gestellt: Keine Bäume. Daher muss ich von irgendeiner bis dato unbekannten Wechselwirkung ausgehen. Wir stellen da jedenfalls keine Bäume hin, die müssen entweder aus irgendeinem Grund aus der Default Umgebung kommen -oder- aus einem anderen Add On. Ultimo Ratio könnten ich versuchen ein Exclude für die Bäume zu kreieren, nur wie weit will man da gehen? Passen denn die Bäume außerhalb des Aprons, z.B. bei der Autobahn oder stehen überall falsche Bäume rum ? Ein Exclude würde ja auch die "richtigen" Bäume fällen. Gruß Thorsten
  5. At the moment we all have three choices: 1: Rename the add on´s *.cgl file to *.OFF or whatever that it will not be loaded (This file contains the custom aerial pictures of the add ons) Downside: You have to do this for EVERY airport you use or maybe you´ll fly over during your flight. Mainly in central Europe. And you`ll have the default Bing aerial at your airport that may not match to the airport layout because it`s outdated or has wrong colors or else. or 2: Turn the use of Bing maps off (The global solution) Downside: No global aerial pictures or 3: Wait until ASOBO gets this fixed. In two days a huge update is planned. I`m sorry, but I do not see any other solutions so far. We developer cannot change anything as the aerials (*.CGL) are compiled with ASOBO SDK tools. Nothing we could change or influence at all. And a lot of products from several different developers are affected. There is no difference if the add on is bought from the MS marketplace or elsewhere. All versions are affected. Thorsten
  6. Joe reports from Norway that everything works fine. No CTD with Munich, Trondheim or else. With Bing aerials on. So It seems to me to be locally bing server related, maybe some corrupted files that are downloaded at startup. Who knows....
  7. Ok, maybe there are some faulty Bing files distrubuted by the Server. Maybe only on some servers. Anyone with CTD could use a VPN set to USA or elsewere to see if the fault is related to German or European Server (if MS does provide more than one server for MSFS, but I guess so) ?
  8. Good find. I also thought about faulty Bing data delivered and causing the crash as this interferes with aerials.
  9. Thanks for the report. Question: Do all users with the new CTD use a German language setting of Win 10 ?
  10. Have tested with and without the WIN10 update. No difference. It was my first thought as well.
  11. Which ones ? Any of the ones I listed like Trondheim or Paderborn ? Any of those airports working does come with custom aerial ground ? Curious to know that I maybe find a reason why Munich and others stopped working this morning. Thorsten
  12. Gentlemen, something strange has happened to MSFS this morning. It will not display a lot of aerial sceneries used for airports like Munich, Trondheim, Paderborn, Hamburg (in development) for instance and cause CTDs when starting from the menu. Flying to the airport is sometimes possible but not allways. I actually do not know what happened to MSFS, but until yesterday everything was perfectly fine. Today we can reproduce the CTD error on several systems with several airport from different devs. It could be related to the regions (canary airports are still fine), or size of aerial files or whatever. Only ASOBO knows what has changed in the background. As soon as we know what happened to the sim and what we can do from our side we´ll do everything possible to solve this problem. Thorsten
  13. Because we believe this topic has been answered we have closed it. If you have any more questions feel free to open a new topic.
  14. With Version 1.02 the CTD problem of EDDM 1.0 and 1.01 in combination with other add ons has been solved. Please install EDDM full version 1.02. The "test file" is again removed from our server, and as Oliver wrote: 1.01 + testfile does not equal 1.02 as we had changed some additional directory names to avoid possible conflicts.
  15. Hello, I thought this will happen simultaneously. Seems not to be the case. I put the testfile onto the server again: http://www.sim-wings.de/SUPPORT_EDDM_MSFS.htm If you dont see the download link refresh your browser plz. Thorsten
×
×
  • Create New...