JetNoise
-
Posts
142 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by JetNoise
-
-
Am 23.11.2023 um 12:40 schrieb Marius Ellenbürger:
Hey,
I am really sorry, I got ill.
We are still coordinating with Honeycomb and we´ll announce the status of the long-awaited Charlie Rudder Pedals at the same tame. Today, I am still not able to provide any details.
Trust me, you´ll be the first to be informed!
Gute Besserung auch von mir !!
Eure Website weiß anscheinend schon mehr, als man uns hier mitteilen kann / will .....
https://www.aerosoft.com/de/shop/flight/hardware/pedals/3717/honeycomb-charlie-rudder-pedals?c=2170 -
Anything new ...
Would be nice to get a status on our orders ..
Waiting since 19 Jul 2022 Order 1120447223
Thank you -
SU11 dropped, working pretty good.
We have got a gorgeus working A310, for free. Still excellent support and responsivness.
Still no news for any CRJs Update.Guys, we are getting our legs pulled, BIG TIME ...
-
3
-
-
vor 14 Minuten schrieb Richard Dastardly:
Yes, this seems awkward & may require a whole chunk of code rewritten just to find it, let alone fix it...
It does feel like it could be a gain issue, or possibly a clamping issue in a controller somewhere, although not sure quite how that relates to a 200nm leg causing oscillations without knowing the actual algorithms. If that's the case the mystery is why, in a system which is *supposedly* accurately timesliced, some people have it worse than others.
Yeah, OR it needs a ASOBO/MS FMC update (someday) to fix the issue. Pure guess, maybe some truth behind it.
Would explain the "helplessness" of AEROSOFT to fix it themselfs....
More than enough examples have been posted meanwhile (the last MONTHS) , me thinksOliver (me HAPPILY flying other airliners and GAs with NO issues !! )
-
1
-
-
vor 2 Stunden schrieb Dopster198:
Yeah, so nice thread highjack. If you read the original topic, this is expressly not one of *those* threads again, there’s plenty of them already.
If this is a reaction to another thread, you should’ve put it there.
Accepted, but i put it here for a (my) good reason ...
Not everbody is happy with the product, so "lucky you" (no offense !)-
1
-
1
-
-
Am 27.7.2022 um 21:56 schrieb Mathijs Kok:
Thanks! No matter what some comments on this forum suggest, this product still sell incredibly well and nothing suggest that to slacken. Commercially this was a jackpot and remains a jackpot.
The issue we are facing at this moment is that we have two very different kinds of customers.
- First of all the old P3D customers, these are demanding seriously complex aircraft. That is simply not always easy to deliver in MSFS. Even simple 'fixes' can have massive impact on other bits of code and that is before we even discuss MSFS Cloud and MSFS on Xbox. You will find their comments on this forum.
- The second (larger) group of customers is less demanding and actually finds the complexity the product offers seriously demanding. The amount of support they need to use the basic functions ("it does not work like the default 737") is extremely costly. These customers hardly ever use forums but use our ticket system. That is why forum comments are almost never give a correct idea about a product. At least 75% of their questions are answered in the manual.
Now, of course, we like to sort out the issue we have. Some are easy, we just need to find the time, some are complex and some depend on changes in the sim. The copy I have on my disk that depends on SU10 is not what you see and even when SU10 is released it will need serious time to get ready for release. This is not FSX that had one (two?) updates. This is a moving target where a complex add-on like this one always runs major risks of failing with an update. If you recall we had that three times. So we are following the sim, not leading.
The idea that we stopped supporting this product is just silly. Just look at the updates we did and compare it to other products. Compare our EFB to that in the PMDG 737.
So Mr. Mathijs Kok
i am really exited about the CRJ ? SU10 version you are looking at ...
Feel free to tell us about, what to expect from this update. PLS.Will it fix the issues with LNAV ?
Will it fix the sound issues reported ?
Will it fix the PITCH issues reported ?
Will it fix the wobbling around on the takeoff run in crosswind situations. (No, i don't fly with keyboard or XBOX controller - ;-))
Will it fix FMC issues when editing the FPL ? (SID/STAR, Direct to's, Inserts)
My only quotes for today:
"and even when SU10 is released it will need serious time to get ready for release"
and
"So we are following the sim, not leading"
What means serious time ?
One year has passed since release of this "study level" product and we are still facing issues present from day one. Reported here and probaply on the Ticket system, many times (from serious simmers and real world CRJ pilots, see Group One above (+ X-Plane guys, not to forget !)
"Following the Sim ..."
Just to name a few other studios, Leonardo, JustFlight, Flysimware, Simworks Studio, Milviz, PMDG, HyperPerformance Group, PMS, WorkingTitle, they seem to be able to do a much! better job.
Why this post ?
Well, a bit of reaction to this thread
Oliver Kohl, Customer
-
1
-
3
-
vor 11 Stunden schrieb Mathijs Kok:
That is fine, we encourage costumers to make buying decisions on how they feel about the company.
I have no hard feelings about the company, Sir. Just the quality, support and feedback (like this one) from you people ...
If you look at my records, you'll see that i have bought MANY !! items for three different sims over all these years, so ....
Oliver Kohl
Customer
-
5
-
2
-
-
Am 22.7.2022 um 03:20 schrieb jay jay:
Unfortunately, I've seen a dozen or more posts where well-meaning people have brought up legitimate flaws with the sim and they are completely ignored by those in charge.
So true, no fixes have been released for the "burning" issues for this otherwise nice aircraft. (LNAV mainly and pitch behaviour in certain situations ..)
I am afraid this will stay, since other (new) projects have priority.
Same for the Twotter, from what i am reading ...
IMO ! I see only excuses and delay tactics
Unless these things get (really) fixed I'll not buy ANY "AEROSOFT quality" aircraft , for sure !!
Sorry to say ..
Oliver
-
4
-
5
-
-
vor einer Stunde schrieb SinusJayCee:
I bet they aren't even aware that this is in issue.
I also imagine that the fix is quite simple. They probably only need to add
on_ap_engage(): ap_trim = get_current_trim()
But maybe I'm too naive here
Here you go
-
vor 15 Stunden schrieb Mathijs Kok:
And back on topic. Please.
Yes Mathijs Kok ....
The topic has not been answered yet ...
-
2
-
-
vor 3 Minuten schrieb SinusJayCee:
Most of those aircraft use the default XP features as well. The difference is that the XP stock systems are more matured than the MSFS ones.
In fact, we are speaking of the AP, which is fare more complex than trim.
I see no issue in Asobo fixing their AP, at least regarding this specific issue. It apparently stores some old value trim somewhere and it needs to use the current value instead. This wouldn't change the behavior of the default planes, since the reactivity would remain the same. I.e. instead of jumping to an old value and then more or less instantly trimming to the value calculated by the AP, it would just start at the current value and then to the desired value. For CRJ with a more realistic trim speed this would solve the current issues, because the trim wouldn't jump to a wrong (old) value but remains at the value set by the pilot. After that, the AP can set the trim to whatever it thinks is right. This doesn't require any changes by Aerosoft.
I am "with you" 100%.
So what is ASOBO waiting for to fix this finally ?. It hasn't been in the latest x Sim Updates ....
Can't be that hard for the AP issue (s?) .LNAV is something different and i am still wondering why some simmers experience this and others don't ...
Oliver
-
What makes me feel sad is, that we got a beautiful looking hull with some minimal necessary interfacing to a default autopilot (ASOBO), a average sound implementation (is it 2 or 3 different switch sounds, some don't sound at all)
and payed 50 Euros.I've got far better aircraft simulations on X-Plane for the same amount of money.
We are speaking about TRIM here, not to mention LNAV and not to forget ILS issuesSorry, but i can't hold it... (1 year after)
-
3
-
-
I see this issue (traffic fallouts) IF:
there was a short disconnect/re-connectfrom the MS servers (on screen alert)
Then traffic alerts continue even when TCAS is turned off.
Oliver
-
1
-
-
vor 8 Stunden , Puuhbear sagte:
I don’t see this behavior.
Do you follow the FD when switching the AP on?
I always try to not just level the aircraft but have it stable on the path given by the flight director.
If I got that right, you should be able to use pitch sync (yoke) .
But for me that doesn't always do the job as it should. Pitch sync may be bugged too. Indication "Sync" is displayed on the PFD only once or twice and then never again.
Oliver
-
gerade, SinusJayCee sagte:
Yes, this of course true. My point was that this is no reason to quit the game by hitting Alt+F4. You can simply push the yoke a little bit until the AP has trimmed the plane correctly or, if it is really serious, you would disconnect the AP.
LOL, of course ...
-
vor 2 Stunden , SinusJayCee sagte:
Hitting the AP disconnect button would have worked as well
The problem remains, once in level, trimmed flight, you activate the AP, the a/c goes haywire again ... . Pitches up, about 7.5+ deg.
To be precise: it does not trim up continuesly, it basically switches to a (given, default ?) value immediately
Oliver
-
vor 2 Stunden , Mathijs Kok sagte:
Okay, we'll have a serious look at this.
Mathijs,
i have seen exactly this behaviour and reported it as well. This was in the first days of the CRJ.
It happend basically from AP-controlled flight to manual flight, while trying to catch the aircraft back due to pilot error.Having it under control, level flight and controlled speed, if you revert back to AP controlled (Heading/Alt) the trim was out of bounds and the a/c pitched up.
As one said here, it looks like TRIM is not resetting from an old setiing or to a default TRIM (UP 7.x)
I still consider this a bug and a serious one , too
AND, havent tried it lately, but is FD SYNC working at all ?? I remember it failing some times
Oliver
Aerosoft One, Zagrep Update Error
in English
Posted
Hallo,
i am trying to install the newly released Zagreb Update via the AO Installer.
Error message: "There was an error checking if system has enough storage ..."
While at the same time i was able to install the latest update for the E-Jets today ...
905 GB of free space available on a 4TB SSD, checked ...
What would be the cause ? And how to fix ?
Oliver