Jump to content

Jetwings32

Members
  • Posts

    273
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Jetwings32

  1. Is there anyway PFPX could be part of cloud or if not now someday, to where it doesn't need to be on same pc as the planes are but still function ?  Like for example, my Flightsim PC is down & at the shop, and I have a feeling pfpx is going end up getting erased. Due to the fact I'll need a new windows restored on there. Wouldn't it be nice though to be able to have a backup pfpx on another PC, so that if one PC is down and you loose data, when you get that pc backup, you can still send data back too the other computer once you reinstall pfpx & not loose all my airplane data like I had.. I had alot of good true airplane info I am now going to have to go back again and once again build all that back up again, which will take alot of time and effort to do.. However If I was able to send it data from another PFPX on another pc and just send the aircraft data back too it.. Along with all my airplanes I have on there.. Be Alot of time saved.

  2. I was wondering if AES will consider doing anything for Cargo doors on the Left side instead of normal right especially on the ERJ & CRJ..

    It kinda looks funny all my other planes get serviced properly but when I fly my ERJ's or CRJ's I have to remove the spots for the normal cargo positions off AES because there was never nothing for the left side & I believe these are the only aircraft that has this problem, maybe possibly some of the wide bodies have there bulk cargo door on the left to but most are on the right behind the main cargo doors.

    Just wondering if not already been added will it be possible sometime to make AES handle ERJ's & CRJ's with cargo door on the left side ??

  3. Would like to see AES work with cloud9 Orlando.. I've experienced to much of the natural jetways looking like it goes right into my airplane & just doesn't look right.. I'd like to have AES so I can adjust the jetway to stop at the right spot & not go where it looks like its inside my plane..

    Any Chance of getting AES on Cloud9 Orlando ??

  4. Hi Shaun or Mathjis whoever answers this first... I'm assuming its because the site has been down but for some reason via the US part of the forum I am getting forbidden access.. I talked to one of the other members of the forum & he said he was able to get on last night yet mine still says Forbidden Access..

    For some reason I am getting a Forbidden to Access this site like I had been banned from the site, However if thats true I wouldn't be able to get on this part of the forum.. So I'm still assuming its because you have it under maintance but then when the other fellow said he was able to get on & I'm still getting the Forbidden Access & the way it worded it like I have been banned got me alittle worried especially when I don't recall ever saying anything really bad enough to get banned..

    Because usually when a site is down it usually says that site is under maintance & its not saying that at all..

    I love your guys work & I have nothing negative to say anything about Aerosoft.. Hopefully its still from the site being under maintance..

    However I feel better if I hear from one of you telling me that I am in still good standing.. Than I'll know for sure its still because of maintance only..

  5. Thats cool. Basically all I was trying to do by what I was trying to make sure is that they'll continue to make Fsx while making X-plane. I think i'll eventually like X-plane someday but right now I like FSX more & i'm just starting to get my FSX built up with scenery.

    Thats why I just wanted to make sure.

  6. Well for starters let me rephrase my question, seeing it looks like I might have pissed few of my fellow pilots & fans of Aerosoft off.. My initial question was nothing going against Aerosoft or there scenery for X-Plane.. We all know that Aerosoft makes some kick Ass Awsome scenery for us to fly into & out of for FSX & now X-Plane.. Its the X-Plane game itself that I had seen some things how it operates that I'm not exactly comfortable with for right now anyway.. Nothing to do with Aerosoft scenery for it though.. There scenery for both is still extremely breath taking..

    I just want to make sure because I'm just getting able to slowly build up my scenery in my FSX & I wanted to make sure Aerosoft for a long time will still be continue to make FSX scenery as well as X-Plane 10 scenery & Aircraft.

    I've seen so many times where a new flightsim comes out & usually soon over alittle time scenery places stop making scenery for the previous flightsim & then your spend all this money putting into your sim & then you have to buy the new one or your screwed because they don't make scenery for the sim you have.. So i just wanted to make sure that wasn't going to happen to me.. Atleast for a very long time.. I'm sure eventually over a few yrs FSX will be just a memory but I really like FSX & hope FSX atleast survives for several more yrs..

    So All I was trying to do is just get a sense to make sure Aerosoft would still make FSX for a very long while yet as well as make scenery for X-Plane flyers also..

  7. Mathis.. Do you or anyone on your staff know, how to finally rid of the Windows 7 64 bit & FSX Fatal error.. I still keep getting it during flight.. I've tried all the usual things you see online but none have worked so far.. So far it happens mostly during flight when I change my views through the top part of FSX using the menu bar for some aircrafts.. Ariane Aircraft I get when either switching between other Ariane Aircraft or like I said during flight & changing views on that one too but i notice so far on most of my 3rd part fleet I have this problem where FSX will suddenly freeze up, then you get the error message screen that says its restarting FSX & then kicks me out of my flights.. At this point because I usually use actual Airline flight number & basically trying to keep up with the real flight thats operating once it does this too me I just cancel it from restarting because there's no point in letting it restart because its not like it returns me to where it kick me from but right back to my starting airport & depending how far into the flight I am makes no sense to try & do it again for it takes the realism away once it does it...

    I'd sure like to find the way to end this error message from ruining my flights... Chances are it will probably do it with the Airbus too because so far its done it with all my 3rd party aircraft at some point.. At first I thought it was just Ariane but I've had it do it at some point with Ifly 737 & ERJ's from feelthere.. Just depends how many times I change my views using the menu bar on top of FSX I guess.. not sure thats the real reason but when I change views which somethings through the menu I need in order to do my flight..

    Just plain in simple if someone finally found a way of beating it, please let me know.. Like to be able to fly & get to my destination but more importantly feel like I can change views & not be scared I'm going to have a Fatal Error that restarts my FSX just because I use the menu bar to do things or change views..

    I'd really like to solve this issue before Airbus X Advance gets released so I can enjoy flying it as well as my other aircraft with no issues

  8. Please before release don't forget to make us a seating chart for those of us who fly Jet Blue.. I remember the original seating chart fell short of 150 seats by 2 seats before & that was counting in the first class section even though JetBlue don't have a first class section.. So don't forget us JetBlue pilots out there that fly JetBlue.. 150 seats in JetBlue A 320

    http://www.seatguru.com/airlines/JetBlue_Airways/JetBlue_Airways_Airbus_A320.php

  9. You already can use Navigraph data, just download the generic data that also works for other aircraft. look for "Flight1 Cheyenne/Fokker/Mustang/Super 80 Professional/C182T "

    I wonder would this same one work with my Ariane Design planes ??

    Never Mind.. This one doesn't work with Ariane anyway :(

  10. Shame, release date is now 20.01.2012 :(

    I can Wait that long.. I've waited this long.. So a nother couple months I can wait I do believe.. Besides I'm flying my Continental 737's & 757 in the mean time.. I'm using the Airbus for JetBlue.. I just hope they remember to do something for the seating for those of us who use JetBlue Airbus because I was missing 2 seats with the original.. Seeing JetBlue holds 150 pax.. The original seating even if I count in the first class section even though JetBlue don't have a first class section I was counting first class with coach & I was still coming up 2 seats short of 150.. So I'm kinda hoping they either adjust the seating chart we have now or make 2 different kinds of seating chart for depending on which Airline we fly.. For those who fly with a First class section the original one would be your choice but for those who fly JetBlue we need seating chart without first class section.. Either way I don't care which route they take on it, just so that those 2 extra seats gets added in..

  11. Excellent! Hope you guys make it to the A318 and A319 as well. If the cockpit is as good as the outside, you have a winner.

    Shame there's no 2D panel, but you can't have it all, can you? :)

    Why a 2D when the Virtual is Better ??

  12. Only a small update....

    Sorry for the lack of info.

    Work is progressing on a much more detailed MCDU coded from scratch.

    It will have lateral revision pages for inserting waypoints, airways, SID's and STAR's.

    The autopilot and Flight By Wire system will receive an overhall too.

    The time for developing all this will take some time, since it's rather complex and most of it cannot be shown by screenshots here anyway.

    Posting screenshots of the new MCDU would only cause some to post bug reports about font / fontalignment issues we allready are aware of.

    Apart from smaller bugfixes to the various aircraft systems (Fuel, electrical etc.) - Only visible change to the ECAM's will be the N1 readouts on the CFM engines and the addition of EPR readouts for the IAE engines.

    Failures and the relevant ECAM messages / checklists will not be implementet - i.e the lower ECAM display will remain as it is right now.

    I will only update progress here when something is worth telling - simply to prevent the hyperventilation we saw in the old Airbus X V1 preview forum.

    Best

    Finn

    Finn Like I was telling Shaun... Can you guys please do something with the seating arrangements within the load planner.. Last time I checked I was 2 seats short even counting in your first class section.. Is there anyway of maybe doing a whole new seating charts, for 2 different versions.. Like for example those airlines that don't have a first class much like JetBlue & & I believe Frontier is like that too where they don't have a first class section but everyone is first class.. & then like it is now having the one with first class section for Airlines like Delta/Northwest, Us Airways, United/Continental which do have first class.. Or atleast adding 2 more seats to the seating chart used already..

    JetBlue has 150 seats in there Airbus 320

    Thanks..

  13. Version 1 was for intermediate users remember wink.gif

    Shaun don't let them forget too, tweek the Load planner for Passangers on planes that hold 150.. Last time i remember from version 1 I'm short 2 seats for using Jetblue which holds 150 Pax but even with counting first & coach the way they had it, i was short 2 seats of being 150.. I was wondering before v2 gets released if there's anyway of adding 2 seats to that seating chart or making 2 seperate seating charts one too work with Airlines that have different classes & another for like JetBlue where everyone is First class because there is no first class seating.. Frontier is also setup like that where there is no first class & everyone is all the same class.. Its mainly US Airways that I know for sure has a first class as well as Delta former Northwest that has the 2 seperate classes.. Either way will work.. However something needs to be done because were short 2 seats from the original... For those of us pilots out there that fly JetBlue.. Also United has 2 seperate classes too I almost forgot about them, But JetBlue has all one class with 150 seats...

    Just don't let them forget to do something about before V2 release..

    Thank you

  14. Has the update yet been made for ERJ'S & CRJ's for there Cargo doors are on the left side unlike all the other aircraft where doors are generally on the right but of all aircraft those 2 have it on the left side.

    I haven't purchase any codes in awhile & was just wondering if the update has already been released containing the new update for handling ERJ'S & CRJ's ??

    Regaurding to the fueler: Its upto you if you want too or not but I was thinking in reguard to the fuelier that perhaps instead of the fuel truck coming, instead can change it too the fuel stand or fuel in-ground pump stand.. I'm not really sure the real name for it but most ramps no longer require the large fuel truck anymore because its all done underground & they just have these contraptions on wheels now that hold the fuel hose & plug into the ground & a hose to connect to the aircraft now to pump the fuel. No longer do you see the large fuel trucks pulling beside the aircraft any longer.. Most all these new ramps have the new under ground fuel system. Maybe on the next update far as the fuelier go you can dump the truck & maybe add in the fuelier guy & that fuel device with the hose running to the aicraft.. Just an idea..

  15. Also for the 757 because the 757 is still narrow body & uses the belt loaders but just alittle taller than most other narrow body aircraft, I wish & hope that if the next update isn't already released with ERJ & CRJ cargo fix on it, that they also add 2 more inches so maybe go to 2.05 before moving to the HI-Loader because as of right now, they don't quite make it up to the cargo door on the 757...

    However I was just thinking, for those that fly the freight version of the 757, it might conflict them alittle big.. However passanger version 757's use belt loaders.. so its like where to draw the line at. So maybe one more inch which be 2.0 would be the last of the belt loaders before moving over to the HI-Loader.. You don't want make it too much higher because those people flying the freight version of the 757 won't like that the hI-Loader looks to high for the door if we stretch the inches too high before switching over.. However I would like to see it go up atleast to 2.0 inches before switches over.. right now it switches at 2.0

  16. Hi Aerosoft, Looking forward to the update & I know you all are working but can hardly wait for it.. Also alittle reminder..Airbus Load planner seating for pax.. I remember I wrote something this before & I got a response that it would be

    added in but I wanted to add just alittle reminder so it didn't get lost in the schuffle somewhere & forgotten but with current seating numbers & compared to couple other Airlines out there but especially JetBlue.. With the total number of coach seats compared to your layout of First class I am still missing 2 seats for the JetBlue seating layout..

    Someone & I forget who it was said that this little matter would be taken care of.. I just wanted to drop alittle line of reminder not to forget about the Seating layout in the load planner...

    JetBlue

    Seats 150 - JetBlue

    US Airways

    First Class - 12

    Coach - 126

    Frontier Airlines Airbus 320

    Seats 126 total with no First Class

    So just a reminder not to forget about fixing the seating layout for the Airbus X update when you can.. Thanks

    Keep up the great work & looking forward too it real soon..

  17. Having the same issue with the QW757... When selecting a cargo aircraft I get another loader which will fit.

    Yea & I bet its the Hi- Loader which is for Cargo & wide Body aircraft.. If you want the belt loaders.. Its anything under 200 but with the 757 from Qualitywings & CS 757 because the 757 is same height no matter what.. The belt loader needs to be allowed to go to atleast 205 if not 210 before switching over too the hi-loader if you want it too look more realistic.. Meaning not look like such a big gap.. The only thing I'm curious about is if it would mess up the wide bodies any if Aerosoft was to fix it too allow 205.. I'll have to try it now that I have my CS 767 that I didn't have befor.. I just picked up the 767 with the Holiday sale where everything was 9.99 in Euro which here in us was like 13 dollars.. So it was well worth it..

    So now I have a wide body I can test it with, too see if my theory would mess up a wide body or not by having Aerosoft fix it so it will go up to 205 I think will be close enough..

  18. Just wondering After the New Updated Airbus X2 comes out later on, if by chance Aerosoft has played with idea of making same intense panel that you have for the 320 & making a Wide Body aircraft.. A330-300- A340-300 & 600 ??

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy & Terms of Use