!! Windows 7 no longer supported !!

As Microsoft will stop supporting Windows 7 on Jan 20th we will be unable to test any of our
products on that platform. It may work, or it may not, but no guarantees from our side. 

Jump to content

Cyberstudio

members
  • Content Count

    75
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Cyberstudio

  1. Yes, i'm sure, but please look at those weight numbers... Like -974077808 I also cant get the EFB to show any positive numbers while in Quito (SEQM). I even tested the plane without payload, only with fuel and it doesnt work.
  2. @Hans Hartmann Please look at this one. This is with a totally empty plane, not even fuel. Please look at the weights too
  3. Hi @Hans Hartmann I don't think that's the case because as you can see below, it happens with all combinations of runway condition and flaps. Please look at the screenshots. This only happened with the new update. Before that it was ok.
  4. Hi! Just installed the latest update and now the V speeds calculation dont work. They show some crazy speed in negative. Please look at the screenshot
  5. I changed manually the file and changed the R237L for R237R And yet the plane still turns left. Is that the only change that i should make? I was under the impression that the drawing was wrong because there's no visible connection between the arc and the flight plan path as i always see on the pmdg/fsl planes but i may be wrong on that
  6. Hi Hans! First of all let me congratulate you. This plane is awesome!. The modeling is just amazing as well as the lightning and the systems! This morning during a flight i found an issue. If you position the plane at TNCM and try to add this SID: " JULNA2 transicion JUICE" you will notice something odd: The route isn' t drawn correctly in the ND. furthermore, if you try to fly it the plane will initially fly it ok until it reaches the beginning of the arc: It will turn left instead of right and stop following the flightplan and will start flying in circles. Please look at the image attached. The issue is fairly easy to reproduce. Just put the plane at TNCM and add the sid JULNA2.
  7. Hi guys! So i finally got the plane a few days ago to learn how to fly it while the cargo version arrives. The plane has a great value. I love the sounds and the modelling (specially the vc). i'm not a fan of the "Like new" look, since these planes are really old by now, but i can understand that they where new too in their time. The handling its amazing as well as the engine lag. I love the fact that you can turn the VC lights at any time, not only at night. That was a must for me. The system modelling is great too. as i said: this offers a lot of value for the money. A few things that i don't like: The product is focused so much in normal procedures that there' s no wiggle room. For example: The cross feed in the fuel panel is not modeled, nor are the fire extinguishers etc. I do hope that the dev maybe increases the complexity a bit more, at least giving us the fuel cross feed. Also, while the product simulates external power/external air there are no visible carts for those and you have to use shortcut keys to activate them since there' s no panel to do so. Something like what the guys from the maddog did should be amazing here. The documentation is very good but the lack of screenshots make it really difficult to follow in a plane with such an amount of switches everywhere and so little automation. To give you an example, i'm yet to find the ground spoilers. Screenshots for the tutorial and the system descriptions can improve the documentation quite a lot. Take the fuel system as an example: The possibility of screwing things up with the fuel system is so big that i'm surprised the documentation doesn't have pictures/diagrams at least for the fuel system. As for bugs, i found one quite curious: The fuel gauges have a small knob on the upper right corner to adjust a small needle. If the needle reaches the limit but you keep scrolling the knob lets say for a minute, you will need to scroll back for a minute too in order to get the needle moving again. Its like while the needle has reached its maximum value, the underlying variable associated with it can be increased anyway. In the sounds department, the only bug that i found so far is that if the flaps are retracted and you push the retract button anyway, the sound plays too as if the lever is moving, but its not since the flaps are up. With the panel night light i found a few labels that are not illuminated but i dont know if that's a bug or if the real plane is like that too. Also, while trying to see if the engines can be seen from the cockpit, i found a hole behind the FE panel. I think that's all for now. As i said, the plane is great and offers a great value. I cant wait for the cargo version to arrive. Thanks a lot @Michael2 for such a great product. I love to see that you continue improving it.
  8. That would be great for sure! I was about to post just about that. That i need a pfpx profile to be able to plan a flight . Im feeling lost without a profile for the dc8
  9. @Michael2 Are you planning to add big features to the plane in the future? Or from now on is just small changes and bug fixes?
  10. Hi guys I love classics so the dc-8 is a natural fit for my tastes. Before i get this, i have a few questions: * Is there any chance that we may get a windowless, cargo version? because what i really want to do is cargo ops * How deep are those systems? What are the compromises? the systems that dont work or are simplistic versions? * Can i save and resume a flight later? i live in a country where we have power cuts so this is a must for me. * Is the INS fully functional? * Can i get the manual before purchasing? Thanks!
  11. Hi Mathijs! Can i ask you, what is the official aerosoft position regarding classic jetliners (For example... 747-200 or a DC8)? and what about something like a learjet? What's the position about that?
  12. Yeah... you may be right. i dont understand anything about marketing. but, as a software developer who make his life writing code 6 days a week, i think i may have a clue about development
  13. Ahh... so bad.. I have that 727 and is full of bugs. the other two are lacking in systems that's why i think they should be made with the Aerosoft Quality
  14. !? What? Dc10? a310? 747? what? done? by who? If you're talking about that old 737.. the vc isn't good at all, and the auto pilot has issues turning. Also, is a few years old by now. i know about the citation you may be thinking about, but im thinking of a bigger one. The 727, well.. is a mess of bugs (At least the one from a famous developer) anyway... please send me a message with the dc10, 747 and a310 developer names please!!
  15. Hi guys! I love the quality of Aerosoft addons, and i always wonder... why only small aircraft projects? like two seat planes, and stuff like that? Please, try with a classic! A classic jetliner or a classic turbo prop. (+10 seats http://forum.aerosoft.com/public/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) If you don't want to make a classic (that's too bad!), try something different. Like a business jet. Some projects that i will die for: 747 Classics (200, 100, SP, etc)DC-8DC-7TristarA cessna citation727! (I know there's one from other developer. i own it, but can't fly with it because its full of bugs!)737 (300, 400, 500)A310DC10 Can you imagine being at Aerosoft Anchorage, with your 747-200, at 3AM, full of cargo, makng your pre-flight for leaving to KJFK!? My god... Wet dream!! What do you say guys? There's an entire market for those. We (the classics lovers) are always ignored. http://forum.aerosoft.com/public/style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif Sorry for my bad english!
  16. Hi Just to confirm this part... What you're saying is that maybe VNAV will not be included? so maybe we will only have LNAV? In that case, we will be descending using the V/S, like on a 747-200?
  17. Hi!, just a note: the DHL Yellow nose and the PIA nose aren't well aligned. Maybe that should be fixed in a future service pack or something
×
×
  • Create New...