Jump to content

CX 747-400

Members
  • Posts

    121
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by CX 747-400

  1. OPabst and Mathijs,

    Thank you for the explanation of why this product is different than the other sceneries that have been done in the past. I have a complete understanding of why this scenery is this way.

    I am one of the few then that still uses FS9 and FSX. I use FS9 for my long haul flights, and FSX for my VFR and short haul flights. With that said, I think that is why I was surprised about this setup. Since you have so nicely explained everything to me, I will have no issues buying both, and say thank you for the 50% discount!

    Again, Thank you for the explanation.

  2. I understand the cost that SimWings had during this process, and the additional time that it will take to port the FSX to FS9, and then make all the modifications that are required. I think that this concept just surprises coming from these 2 companies that have not done this in the past. I will buy this scenery without a doubt. Again, I am just surprised in this move. This is the type of pricing I would expect from BP or Ima***Sim; just as I would not expect FT or FSDT to do something like this (and yes, I think of SW and AS in the same quality). I am willing to pay $35(USD) for a scenery package; but I have never come across a scenery package that is worth $45 (USD), or maybe a small few.

  3. I have been waiting for this airport for a long time, and it looks great. However, the fact that FS9 is only going to be available at an additional cost is really making me reconsider this purchase. I know that AS and SW sceneries are worth the cost, but this is something I am not use to seeing from either company. If this product was coming from a designer of lesser quality, I would expect that, but this one is really disappointing. I know I will end up buying it, but I dont know when or which one.

    Either way, Thank you for making the scenery!

  4. Or you can see or not. Nothing more, nothing less. But visually a huge difference...

    Lets try that comparison with the correct aircraft. We can not talk about the A320, and show pics of B737.

    1765778.jpg1763608.jpg

    The Boeing 737 has a lot a flex to it, but I dont see enough in the A320 to in worry about it.

    • Upvote 2
  5. It makes no sense to use this addon with AES, because you need to set the FSX Apron Traffic to 0% to prevent conficts with the FSX apron cars, so you need to disable them, also this addon.

    It's only helpful for Users not have AES or when flying between non AES Airports.

    Thank you for your response. With the quality of the cars, and equipment that this add on has, is there a way to use them, and replace the AES equipment?

  6. Why dont you try it and develop an airport like Munich yourself on time?

    I know that it very annoying for people to ask question about the time frame of release of new scenery, however, I find responding in this fashion a little bit more annoying than the orignal question. If the question bothers you so much, why bother posting a rude response? No response would have been better. That is my two cents. dry.gif

    -------------------

    Back on topic.

    Munich is looking amazing. I can not wait to get my hands on it!!!!! Keep up the good work!!!! laugh.gif

    • Upvote 5
  7. Yes, it is. Jumbos and Triple Sevens are not regular visitors to Tegel, but they do come on some occasions.

    Mainly governmental ones (from the USA, Japan, Arab countries, etc).

    767s though are regular visitors, mainly from the USA (Delta, Continental).

    There are also regular big airbuses: A330 (Air Berlin, Qatar, Hainan) and A340 (Turkish, also on A330).

    I cannot wait for the release either.

    Come on, Rainer, no more tortures! wink.gif

    Best regards,

    Rafal

    That is great news. Looks like I will be buying my first german scenery.

  8. I am not sure if this one will be for FS2004. That market is very limited at this moment and there is already a nice Schiphol from C9 at this moment. I know it is outdated a bit but we need a few thousand FS2004 customers to make it worthwhile. I am just not sure those customers are around at this moment. For sure Rotterdam and Lelystad will be FSX only as for these smaller airports we need a larger customer base.

    I own C9 EHAM, but you can count me in for 2 FS9 Copies (one for each Computer), if you make it for FS9.

    Jonathan

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy & Terms of Use