LapCheong 45 Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 as u can see. Do i have to reinstall? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted January 14, 2013 Aerosoft Share Posted January 14, 2013 You mean the route display on the ND? I do not think a re-install will change any of that, I believe it is a procedure that is not correctly read or not correct in the database. Can you tell us exactly what you programmed in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPT. Farhadi 23 Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 i think this is for "FlightPlan Discontinuity" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted January 14, 2013 Aerosoft Share Posted January 14, 2013 i think this is for "FlightPlan Discontinuity" Indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPT. Farhadi 23 Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 but in real plane,FMGS wont draw a line to nowhere,'cause of flightplan discontinuity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LapCheong 45 Posted January 14, 2013 Author Share Posted January 14, 2013 its from WSSS SID PIMOK A576 SALAX N633 RUMID STAR WMKK Using 2L SID BOG1A And landing at 32L Stars LAPIR2 I using airac 1301 i did as per normal, WSSS/WMKK, align , Cl 45 , FL 240 and next page.And i start enter the flightpan and folo by takeoff page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LapCheong 45 Posted January 14, 2013 Author Share Posted January 14, 2013 Mathijs i found out with airac 1301 i have this problem when switch back to navdatapro i got perfect t/c and t/d This gave me a another reason to buy navdatapro? haha I will report back after i re install Reinstalled airac 1301 it gave me a t/d but this. its should be connected to topam WP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted January 14, 2013 Aerosoft Share Posted January 14, 2013 Mathijs i found out with airac 1301 i have this problem when switch back to navdatapro i got perfect t/c and t/d This gave me a another reason to buy navdatapro? haha I will report back after i re install Reinstalled airac 1301 it gave me a t/d but this. its should be connected to topam WP Well the Airbus was developed on NavDataPro so it could be that there are some procedures that work better with it. But we also have a few where Navigraph seems to get the best results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LapCheong 45 Posted January 14, 2013 Author Share Posted January 14, 2013 :confused_s: :confused_s: I will stay with navdatapro 1213 until there is a bigger change in the routes Then the airac for pmdg i think Oh ya mathijs mind looking at here? Some gsx suggestion. NOT IMPORTANT - General - Aerosoft Community Services Its about linking gsx and the pushback of the right mcdu together,so ppl with gsx wun have 2 voices when having their pushbacks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPT. Farhadi 23 Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 tried restarting windows? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPT. Farhadi 23 Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 happened to me too!!!!!!!!!! i don't think this would work,what you think Mr. Kok?what are we supposed to do?came back from navigraph to navdatapro,now navdatapro is penalting us!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted January 14, 2013 Aerosoft Share Posted January 14, 2013 happened to me too!!!!!!!!!! damn it,i don't think this would work,what you think Mr. Kok?what are we supposed to do?came back from navigraph to navdatapro,now dnavdatapro is penalting us!!! We'll look at these procedures and see what's in that data that cause the MCDU to misunderstand them. We had many more of these issues and many are solved already, but for sure there will be more. What does help is to report them in the correct section: http://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/forum/552-route-issues/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPT. Farhadi 23 Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 i got ittttttttttttttttttttttttttt!!!!!!!!!! its about "INTCP" waypoint,which is calculated to intercept on "a" route(which i don't know why fmc is making this in these conditions and coordinations) if you delete it,that freaking line will disappear and your route won't damage by deleting this that strategy worked for me,hope would work for you! Regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPT. Farhadi 23 Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 i have a general question,does AXE's fmc calculate "level off" points on route?what about "starting descend/climb" points on route,during descend/climb stop? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ekg80 5 Posted January 20, 2013 Share Posted January 20, 2013 Well the Airbus was developed on NavDataPro so it could be that there are some procedures that work better with it. But we also have a few where Navigraph seems to get the best results. Sorry, but this is a point I don't understand: why is it possible that some procedures work better with your navdata and others with Navigraph? If the syntax is used correctly then your bus should be able to handle it, regardless whether the navdata comes from your company or another. I guess at the moment the problem is how your bus is handling the different commands, Markus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.